Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On 11/30/2016 03:19 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Josh Boyer > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Paul Bolle > wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 17:15 -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > >> I no

Re: Kernel configurations for Fedora -- a proposal

On 11/30/2016 08:59 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:51:29 -0800 > Laura Abbott wrote: > >> On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration >>> in F

Re: Kernel configurations for Fedora -- a proposal

On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: > Hi, > > As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration > in Fedora > (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DBOBI6F3SLEAW2O5RLGZOOXQ5VKEWQIW/) > I have a prototyp

Kernel configurations for Fedora -- a proposal

Hi, As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration in Fedora (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DBOBI6F3SLEAW2O5RLGZOOXQ5VKEWQIW/) I have a prototype of what a method of keeping each configuration file in a separate file woul

Re: [PATCH 1/5] Run oldnoconfig make targets silently

On 11/14/2016 12:36 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 14:47 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> You keep saying things like that, but I honestly have lost all context >> of what you are actually wanting to change here and why. > > My overall goals are pretty vague, so I suppose my objections a

Re: [PATCH] Enable flex file support in the NFS server

On 11/04/2016 09:29 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: The upstream commit 9b9960a0c introduced simple flex file server which enables the testing of the flex client. This patch enables the support to be on by default but the 'pnfs' exports option is still needed to active the code. Enabled this option

Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: don't pass on-stack memory to sg_set_buf

On 11/04/2016 09:51 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: From: J. Bruce Fields As of ac4e97abce9b "scatterlist: sg_set_buf() argument must be in linear mapping", sg_set_buf hits a BUG when make_checksum_v2->xdr_process_buf, among other callers, passes it memory on the stack. We only need a scatterlist to

Re: Refresh Secure Boot patchset

On 10/25/2016 10:24 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: The upstream 0-day bot found an issue with the existing patchset in the rawhide kernel. Everything builds fine as a whole, but if one were to bisect the patches, a build would break because the shim GUID is used in a patch before it is actually defined.

Re: Supported way to require that a service be stopped prior to installing an .rpm package?

On 10/25/2016 04:23 PM, jha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, My team is building and maintaining a fairly complex software stack that is being packaged via rpm. As part of the requirements, the service provided by the .rpm file must be stopped prior to installation / update of the package. Is ther

Re: Kernel configurations for Fedora

On 10/25/2016 01:17 PM, John W. Linville wrote: On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 15:59 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:14:08PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:46:00AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: The Fedora kernel has had roughly the same system for generating

Re: Kernel configurations for Fedora

On 10/25/2016 10:53 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 10:46 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: Anyone have experiences with or opinions about the kernel configuration generation? The goal is to only change the way the configurations are generated and not the options that are enabled. Naive

Kernel configurations for Fedora

The Fedora kernel has had roughly the same system for generating the kernel configuration for a very long time. There are a series of files listing configuration choices (CONFIG_FOO=y, CONFIG_FOO is not set etc.) that get combined to generate the final config files. This has gotten unsustainable f

Re: [PATCH] Add Mellanox LEDs support

On 10/19/2016 07:08 AM, Yotam Gigi wrote: This driver enables to control the leds on Mellanox switches. Signed-off-by: Yotam Gigi --- config-generic | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/config-generic b/config-generic index 4ef2afd..e9f493d 100644 --- a/config-ge

Re: [PATCH] Don't list /lib/modules/$KernelVer/kernel twice

On 10/12/2016 01:00 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: For quite some time I see warnings like warning: File listed twice: /lib/modules/[...]/kernel when building the kernel-core rpm. This is because that directory is included both in module-dirs.list (and therefor in, basically, kernel-core.list) and in

Re: realtek wireless modules

On 10/10/2016 11:53 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi Laura, Justin, et el, I've been playing with a handful of cheap USB wireless modules for support on the Raspberry Pi and other similar de

Reminder: Please test F23 kernels

We're starting to see a fall off in F23 karma. This may start to slow down how fast F23 gets new kernels. If you still have an F23 system, please remember to test and give karma for new kernels. A big thanks to those who have been regularly testing older releases. Thanks, Laura ___

Re: Kernel 4.7 rebase plans

On 08/23/2016 02:38 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: On 08/15/2016 08:31 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: Hi, I just submitted the 4.6.6 kernel update to stable for F23/F24. Both 4.7.1 and 4.6.7 are expected to be released upstream on Tuesday. 4.6.7 will be the last 4.6.y based kernel for F23/F24. 4.7.1 or

Re: [PATCH] Check configuration files

On 08/25/2016 12:53 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: Hi Laura, [It seems I just sent a reply to /dev/null. Let's try again.] On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 12:08 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: On 08/25/2016 11:35 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: No, we don't. We try to finish the build if that's possible

Re: [PATCH] Check configuration files

On 08/25/2016 11:35 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 09:16 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: On 08/25/2016 03:19 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: The issue is that CONFIG_PWM_LPSS was set =m but it wasn't actually set at all. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335196 as well. Y

Re: [PATCH] Check configuration files

On 08/25/2016 03:19 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 13:24 -0700, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Duble check generated configuration files in order to avoid discrepancies like this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347454 What does this actually mean? Discrepancies (

Re: Kernel 4.7 rebase plans

On 08/15/2016 08:31 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: Hi, I just submitted the 4.6.6 kernel update to stable for F23/F24. Both 4.7.1 and 4.6.7 are expected to be released upstream on Tuesday. 4.6.7 will be the last 4.6.y based kernel for F23/F24. 4.7.1 or 4.7.2 will be available for testing sometime

Re: The future of secure boot patches in Fedora

On 08/22/2016 02:50 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: On 08/22/2016 01:16 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:08 PM, John Dulaney wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:28:18PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: The secure boot patches have

Re: The future of secure boot patches in Fedora

On 08/22/2016 05:22 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 03:50:22PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: On 08/22/2016 01:16 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:08 PM, John Dulaney wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:28

Re: The future of secure boot patches in Fedora

On 08/22/2016 01:16 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:08 PM, John Dulaney wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:28:18PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: The secure boot patches have been around in the Fedora tree for a while now. They work well enough but there has not been much active

The future of secure boot patches in Fedora

The secure boot patches have been around in the Fedora tree for a while now. They work well enough but there has not been much active work in getting them accepted upstream in recent years. The longer they exist out of tree the harder they get to maintain without extra support. If there isn't a pa

Re: [PATCHv2] Check generated config files

On 08/17/2016 12:38 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Double check configuration files in order to avoid discrepancies like this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347454 Even after the typo corrections this still isn't completely working for me. Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silve

Re: building the rawhide kernel with cgroup-v2 cpu controller patches

On 08/17/2016 04:06 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Unfortunately, due to the disagreements in the kernel development community, CPU controller cgroup v2 support has not been merged and enabling it requires applying two small out-of-tree

Kernel 4.7 rebase plans

Hi, I just submitted the 4.6.6 kernel update to stable for F23/F24. Both 4.7.1 and 4.6.7 are expected to be released upstream on Tuesday. 4.6.7 will be the last 4.6.y based kernel for F23/F24. 4.7.1 or 4.7.2 will be available for testing sometime early next week. If you have any questions please

Re: [PATCH] Check generated config files

On 08/10/2016 01:54 AM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Double check configuration files in order to avoid discrepancies like this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347454 Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio These are the steps or stages I understood to take part in the process of

Re: [PATCHv3] Script to highlight state of patches in tree

On 08/10/2016 02:19 AM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: The intent for this script is to make easier patch management and documentation. Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio * PATCHv1 - use colors to highlight the patch location - different flags to list patches in PatchList.txt kernl.spec

Re: slub debug

On 08/10/2016 12:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: [root@f24m ~]# grep SLUB_DEBUG /boot/config-4.8.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc25.x86_64 CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y # CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON is not set When I boot with slub_debug=1, I get this at boot time: [0.00] slub_debug option '1' unknown. skipped https://fed

Re: [PATCH]

On 08/09/2016 06:25 PM, Yuta Kobayashi wrote: This patch provides definition of Microsoft Type Cover Pro 4 (JP). The patch looks fine but it needs to be submitted to the upstream maintainers before it goes into Fedora. Try running your patch through scripts/get_maintainer.pl in the kernel dire

Re: error building master branch

On 08/09/2016 03:34 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2016-08-08 16:58 GMT+02:00 Laura Abbott : On 08/08/2016 01:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Lo! Mr. Aappddeevv wrote on 08.08.2016 03:47: I am encountering compile errors building off master. My build system is f24. Any thoughts? I did some

Re: fedora.git upstream 0-Day build testing

On 08/09/2016 11:32 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi kernel people, Recently the upstream 0-Day build testing project started building the exploded kernel git tree for Fedora on kernel.org: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jwboyer/fedora.git/ That was somewhat of a surprise. It has found

Re: error building master branch

On 08/08/2016 01:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Lo! Mr. Aappddeevv wrote on 08.08.2016 03:47: I am encountering compile errors building off master. My build system is f24. Any thoughts? I did some google searches but could not find anyone else that had the same problem. One of the errors is be

Re: [PATCHv5] update script to add a new patch

On 07/27/2016 11:10 AM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: It enables the builid macro and uses the name of the patch as label instead of using rpmdev-bumpspec. Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- * PATCHv2 - Fix: Fail adding a patch with no description - Fix: Fail to add a patch outside t

Re: [PATCHv4] Script helps add a new patch to the tree.

On 07/22/2016 11:20 AM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: On 07/22/2016 10:02 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: On 07/20/2016 09:44 AM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: It enables the builid macro and uses the name of the patch as label instead of rpmdev-bumpspec. Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio

Re: [PATCHv4] Script helps add a new patch to the tree.

On 07/20/2016 09:44 AM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: It enables the builid macro and uses the name of the patch as label instead of rpmdev-bumpspec. Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio This doesn't apply to my tree and neither does the patch for perf-man. Can you double check how you are g

Re: [PATCHv3] Script to add a new patch to the tree

On 07/18/2016 08:31 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Script helps add a new patch to the soruce tree. It enables the builid macro and uses the name of the patch as label instead of using rpmdev-bumpspec. Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- * PATCHv2 - Fix: Fail adding a patch with no d

Re: [PATCHv2] Script check-patchlist

On 07/11/2016 04:47 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: There are patches present in the tree that are present in kernel.spec but are not recorded in PatchList.txt. The script below helps list all the patches in the tree and whether they are present in kernel.spec, PatchList.txt or if they are pres

Re: [PATCH] Removes unused-kernel-patches in Makefile

On 07/18/2016 11:56 AM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: After discussing with my mentor [ Laura Abbott ]. Looks like the following is not longer needed. Tweaking the commit text just to say it's being removed. No need to cite me, for future reference. Applied with changes. Signed-o

Re: [PATCHv4] Script to generate perf-man tarball.

On 07/08/2016 12:48 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: This script helps generate the perf-man tarball. By default it uses the kernel version of the upstream tree set in LINUX_GIT. In the given case the the upstream tree and the current tree do not have the same version use the --version=x.y Sign

Re: [RFC] proposal for run time memory allocation for crash kernel

On 06/25/2016 06:47 AM, Ronit Halder wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: On 06/23/2016 05:20 AM, Ronit halder wrote: Currently, linux kernel allocates memory at the boot time for crash kernel booted using kexec system call in kernel crash. It will be very useful if we

Re: [RFC] proposal for run time memory allocation for crash kernel

On 06/23/2016 05:20 AM, Ronit halder wrote: Currently, linux kernel allocates memory at the boot time for crash kernel booted using kexec system call in kernel crash. It will be very useful if we can allocate memory in run time. The user can get more usable RAM if we can do that. What kind of

Re: [RFC] Prototype Patch of "proposal for run time memory allocation for crash kernel"

On 06/23/2016 05:30 AM, Ronit halder wrote: Signed-off-by: Ronit Halder The patch doesn't apply cleanly, are you copying and pasting the patch into a mail client? That's prone to breakage. Try using git-send-email, see http://kernelnewbies.org/Outreachyfirstpatch for tutorials on getting that

Re: [PATCH] grab-logs.sh

On 06/21/2016 09:15 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Download the build logs for a list of architectures. Only downloads the logs if they are present in the server. Logs are saved in logs directory within the source tree. By default looks at build logs for i686, x86_64, noarch and armv7hl. L

Re: [PATCHv2] generate-git-snapshot.sh

On 06/21/2016 01:12 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: The script requires LINUX_GIT to be set, preferably, in your local .bashrc. I added a quick check to see if .bashrc exits and check it first to see if LINUX_GIT is set there. Fixed the comment size to be less the 80 characters per line and t

[PATCH] Update PatchList.txt

This file hasn't been updated for 2.5 years. Do a refresh listing the patches that Fedora is carrying for the forseable future (no upstream or long term path) --- This lets check-patchlist.sh be useful. Additional commentary is welcome. --- PatchList.txt | 103 ++---

Re: [PATCH] script check-patchlist.sh

On 06/16/2016 03:30 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Makes it easier to manage patches by listing all the patches tracked in PatchList.txt and kernel.spec. and those patches that are in the tree but not added to any of these files. This looks really good! I'm going to submit a patch to update

Re: [PATCHv2] rpmbuild combination for bare minimum custom kernel

On 06/15/2016 11:16 AM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio Looks good to me. Can you submit a separate patch to delete the existing fast-x86_64 script with a note that it is replaced by this script? --- scripts/fast-build.sh | 13 + 1 file change

Re: [PATCHv3] Script to generate perf-man tarball

On 06/15/2016 11:08 AM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- Request for when you are sending out another version of a patch (v2, v3 etc.) Can you give a small summary right below the commit here describing what has changed since the previous version? This is

Re: [PATCH] scritp to add a new patch

On 06/13/2016 12:45 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- scripts/newpatch.sh | 42 ++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) create mode 100755 scripts/newpatch.sh diff --git a/scripts/newpatch.sh b/scripts/newpatch.sh n

Re: [PATCH] scritp to add a new patch

On 06/13/2016 12:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- scripts/newpatch.sh | 42 ++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) create mode 100755 scripts/newpatch.sh

Re: [PATCH] Downloads build logs only if exist

On 06/14/2016 02:23 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Makes the script a bit more fail safe by only downloading the build logs if they exist. It also keeps all the logs in one place. Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- scripts/grab-logs.sh | 32 +--- 1 file ch

Re: [PATCH] Check if LINUX_GIT is set in .bashrc

On 06/13/2016 07:42 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio Looks good to me, one minor comment below: --- scripts/generate-git-snapshot.sh | 9 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/generate-git-snapshot.sh b/scripts/

Re: Problem with MODULE_SIG=y

On 06/15/2016 02:55 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: Hi, I work on a driver (drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw) that is made up of three modules: mlxsw_pci, mlxsw_core and a third module that is loaded by mlxsw_core according to the probed PCI device ID via request_module(). However, this function fail

Re: [PATCH] fast-build.sh rpmbuild combo for faster compilation

On 06/13/2016 12:54 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: On vr, 2016-06-10 at 12:42 -0700, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: +rpmbuild --target $1 --without debuginfo --without perf --without tools --rebuild $2 When I build locally I also have: --with baseonly --without debug --without doc I've bee

Re: [PATCH 2/4] Removes bumpspecfile.py

On 06/10/2016 12:23 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: No longer needed. Use rpmdev-bumpspec instead. Applied to tree. Thanks! Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- scripts/bumpspecfile.py | 76 - 1 file changed, 76 deletions(-) delete mo

Re: [PATCH] Removes rediffall.sh

On 06/10/2016 12:20 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: After dicussing with Kernel Development team arrived to the conclusion that this is an old script and not needed anymore. Applied to tree. Thanks! Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- scripts/rediffall.pl | 64 -

Re: [PATCH] Removes allarchconfig.sh

On 06/10/2016 12:30 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Functionality already implemented in kernel.spec file. Applied to tree. Thanks! Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- scripts/allarchconfig.sh | 16 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) delete mode 100755 scripts/allarc

Re: [PATCH] scritpt to generate git snapshot

On 06/13/2016 03:23 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio There is already a scripts/generate-git-snapshot.sh. I don't know how you managed to send a new copy. If there are changes, can you just send an incremental patch? --- scripts/generate-git-snapshot.

Re: [PATCH] fast-build.sh rpmbuild combo for faster compilation

On 06/13/2016 06:45 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:15:52PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:42:59PM -0700, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- scripts/fast-build.s

Re: [PATCH] fast-build.sh rpmbuild combo for faster compilation

On 06/13/2016 11:41 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote: On 06/10/2016 03:42 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio --- scripts/fast-build.sh | 13 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100755 scr

Re: F24 4.6.y rebase plans

On 06/08/2016 05:29 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi All, The upstream stable maintainers released kernels 4.5.7 and 4.6.2 yesterday. I thought I would send a brief word about how the rebase of F24 to 4.6.y will happen. We'll ship 4.5.7 as the final 4.5.y update and have that available as the 0-day up

Re: CONFIG_INTEL_POWERCLAMP not enabled in fedora

On 05/17/2016 05:54 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote: I recently wanted to experiment with Intel idle injection but noticed that CONFIG_INTEL_POWERCLAMP is not enabled in f23/f24. # cat /boot/config-4.5.4-300.fc24.x86_64 | grep POWERCLAMP # CONFIG_INTEL_POWERCLAMP is not set Is this is an oversight? A

Re: 4.4 rebase coming to F23 soon

On 02/24/2016 11:17 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: Jóhann_B._Guðmundsson wrote: Arguably the regression in 4.4 with drm/i915 that causes screen flickering in dual monitor setups needs to be looked at before this gets released since it will g

Re: 4.4 rebase coming to F23 soon

On 02/18/2016 05:51 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: Hi, 4.4.2 is currently building and should be in updates-testing soon. As usual, please test and give karma appropriately (negative karma for new issues, not existing issues). Thanks, Laura A use after free bug was found in the 4.4.2 release. Since

Re: 4.4 rebase coming to F23 soon

On 02/19/2016 12:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 19.02.2016 um 02:51 schrieb Laura Abbott: 4.4.2 is currently building and should be in updates-testing soon. As usual, please test and give karma appropriately (negative karma for new issues, not existing issues) i don't see a running

4.4 rebase coming to F23 soon

Hi, 4.4.2 is currently building and should be in updates-testing soon. As usual, please test and give karma appropriately (negative karma for new issues, not existing issues). Thanks, Laura ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://

Re: Building a kernel

On 01/23/2016 04:57 PM, Michael Hill wrote: Since the last version of Fedlet came out, I've been building a kernel package on my Baytrail tablet from the fc24 source rpm following these instructions: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel This worked for a number of 4.2 kernels

Re: Policy for driver backports?

On 01/07/2016 12:25 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: Adding the kernel list on CC because this is a good question and there's no reason to not answer a broader number of people. On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: Other than the bug I filed, 4.3 is missing two things for full Dell Sk

experimental scripts for bisecting the kernel

Hi all, I expanded on some of the scripts that Josh wrote and came up with a set of scripts to aid in bisecting the kernel project. The idea here is to replay the Fedora patches on top of each step of a kernel bisect. Ultimately, I'd like to have something to give to bugzilla reporters to be able

<    1   2   3