Re: Reviving the hardware census

On 11/26/2017 01:16 PM, Benson Muite wrote: > Will one be able to opt out or easily choose what information is sent? I imagine this will end up being opt-in rather than opt-out, but regardless of that, it'll definitely be easy for the user to configure what information they send. > What happens

Re: Reviving the hardware census

On 11/10/2017 01:17 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > The more I look at lshw, the more I'm ambivalent (I'm not against it, > just not for it either). It certainly collects a lot of relevant > information. However, I see the following problems. > > 1. lshw tries to make things human readable. This

RFC: Moving kernel-tools out of kernel.spec

Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time. Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been experimenting with moving these to a separate spec file. Advantages: - Less stuff in the

Re: RFC: Moving kernel-tools out of kernel.spec

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time. > Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace > tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been > experimenting