On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:10:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 16:46 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
Here is a patch I was looking to post upstream. This should address your
concerns. Let me know how it works out for you.
0) Compiles cleanly.
1) Nothing shows up anymore at
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:27 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
I am concerned about the error you are seeing, -95. Is it possible you can
provide me a 'dmesg' log of your boot up. I want to see what chipset the
perf subsystem thinks it found.
Sure, no problem. Off-list or on-list?
And what messages
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 06:32:33PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:27 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
I am concerned about the error you are seeing, -95. Is it possible you can
provide me a 'dmesg' log of your boot up. I want to see what chipset the
perf subsystem thinks it
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:38 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
[All] I am interested in is the few
lines above the NMI watchdog error that starts with Performance Events:
[0.016136] Performance Events:
[0.016139] no APIC, boot with the lapic boot parameter to force-enable it
[0.016142] no
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 08:42:34PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:38 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
[All] I am interested in is the few
lines above the NMI watchdog error that starts with Performance Events:
[0.016136] Performance Events:
[0.016139] no APIC, boot
