On 12/06/2016 04:44 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Lo! On 21.11.2016 19:46, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>
>> As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration
>> in Fedora
>>
Lo! On 21.11.2016 19:46, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration
> in Fedora
> (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DBOBI6F3SLEAW2O5RLGZOOXQ5VKEWQIW/)
> I have a prototype of what a method of
On 11/30/2016 05:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration
>>> in Fedora
>>>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration
>> in Fedora
>>
On 2016-11-30 11:59 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:51:29 -0800
Laura Abbott wrote:
On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration
in Fedora
On 11/30/2016 08:59 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:51:29 -0800
> Laura Abbott wrote:
>
>> On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration
>>> in Fedora
>>>
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:51:29 -0800
Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration
> > in Fedora
> >
On 11/21/2016 10:46 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration
> in Fedora
> (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DBOBI6F3SLEAW2O5RLGZOOXQ5VKEWQIW/)
> I have a prototype of what a method
Hi,
As a follow up to the previous discussion about kernel configuration
in Fedora
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DBOBI6F3SLEAW2O5RLGZOOXQ5VKEWQIW/)
I have a prototype of what a method of keeping each configuration
file in a separate file
On 10/25/2016 10:53 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 10:46 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
Anyone have experiences with or opinions about the kernel
configuration generation? The goal is to only change the way
the configurations are generated and not the options that are
enabled.
Naive
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 16:26 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Should be a simple enough thing to script even,
> to get a "stale config options" report, the output of which could be fed
> to a find command that removes them from the configs/ tree...
Something like scripts/check-configs.pl?
Paul Bolle
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:17:25PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 15:59 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:14:08PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:46:00AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Fedora kernel
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 15:59 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:14:08PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:46:00AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > >
> > > The Fedora kernel has had roughly the same system for generating
> > > the kernel configuration
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:14:08PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:46:00AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > The Fedora kernel has had roughly the same system for generating
> > the kernel configuration for a very long time. There are a series
> > of files listing configuration
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:46:00AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> The Fedora kernel has had roughly the same system for generating
> the kernel configuration for a very long time. There are a series
> of files listing configuration choices (CONFIG_FOO=y, CONFIG_FOO
> is not set etc.) that get
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 10:46 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Anyone have experiences with or opinions about the kernel
> configuration generation? The goal is to only change the way
> the configurations are generated and not the options that are
> enabled.
Naive question: why can't we use one .config
The Fedora kernel has had roughly the same system for generating
the kernel configuration for a very long time. There are a series
of files listing configuration choices (CONFIG_FOO=y, CONFIG_FOO
is not set etc.) that get combined to generate the final config
files. This has gotten unsustainable
17 matches
Mail list logo