> It's not unrelated. That is the actusl phy on the SDP.
and the same for REPs? our target cert platform?
>
> From: Manoj Iyer [manoj.i...@canonical.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 10:11 PM
> To: Timur Tabi
> Cc: Manoj Iyer; Andrew Cloke; David
Sorry, I'm not sure what happened there. I meant to say that that is the
*actual* PHY on the SDP board. It's an Atheros 8031 PHY. I was hoping
that we could get away with the genphy driver that's built-in, but
apparently not.
Ubuntu should be building every PHY driver anyway. I don't know
It's not unrelated. That is the actusl phy on the SDP.
From: Manoj Iyer [manoj.i...@canonical.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 10:11 PM
To: Timur Tabi
Cc: Manoj Iyer; Andrew Cloke; David Douglas; 1677...@bugs.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: Zesty use
That is hard to SRU, we don't want to be adding unrelated modules to DI.
With at803x loaded
==
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu 4.10.0-10-generic #13~ubunturc2+build.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 28
23:33:09 UTC 2017 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$
4 matches
Mail list logo
