[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1779736] Re: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts

2020-09-02 Thread Colin Ian King
I'm reluctant to change the ZFS default to make NFSv4 work out of the box as this may cause regressions for users expecting the default. I'm making this bug a wish until somebody can produce compelling evidence why we should change the default and how this won't affect the user experience for the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1779736] Re: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts

2020-07-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1779736] Re: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts

2020-05-29 Thread Richard Laager
seth-arnold, the ZFS default is actltype=off, which means that ACLs are disabled. (I don't think the NFSv4 ACL support in ZFS is wired up on Linux.) It's not clear to me why this is breaking with ACLs off. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1779736] Re: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts

2020-05-28 Thread Seth Arnold
The default NFSv4 acls may be a poor choice on ZOL. This keeps biting people unexpectedly, I wonder how many people this has affected and they never spot it? Thanks ** Also affects: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1779736] Re: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts

2019-09-03 Thread Databay
Same for me, setting posixacl on ZFS exported via NFS is a workaround -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779736 Title: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts Status in linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1779736] Re: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts

2019-08-04 Thread Luis Felipe Marzagao
I can confirm setting acltype to posixacl on the dataset shared via NFS fixes the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779736 Title: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1779736] Re: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts

2019-03-07 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
I can confirm that "zfs set acltype=posixacl foo/bar/" is an effective workaround. It appears to be unset by default. root@box /root# zfs set acltype=posixacl pool/srv/thing root@box /root# zfs get acltype pool/srv NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE pool/srv acltype off default

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1779736] Re: umask ignored on NFSv4.2 mounts

2019-03-07 Thread Seth Arnold
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.