*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1215411 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215411
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1215411
libcpupower.so is not installed from linux-tools
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is
It appears to fail only for ppc64el. The proper solution sounds to be
complicated; would it be suitable as a temporary workaround to drop that
arch from the cpufreqd package (and leave this bug open until the
underlying issue is resolved)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
See also bug 1215411 for some discussion regarding providing
libcpupower.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891336
Title:
gkrellm2-cpufreq depends on libcpupower-dev
** Tags added: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891336
Title:
gkrellm2-cpufreq depends on libcpupower-dev produced by Debian kernel
Status in cpufreqd
Present on Debian, but not Ubuntu:
$ rma libcpupower-dev
libcpupower-dev | 4.9.228-1 | oldstable | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libcpupower-dev | 4.19.118-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1 | stretch-backports | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386,
The new update to "cpufreqd" now also build-depends on libcpupower-dev.
This is more common to be used, so the prio slightly increases IMHO.
OTOH cpufreqd already has delta, and we might as well try to build differently.
The package seems community/foundations maintained, but not in main.
Adding
6 matches
Mail list logo
