On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, reinette chatre wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 10:24 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Issue is still present in 2.6.31-rc8.
Is there any chance that you could connect a serial line to the machine?
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 10:24 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Issue is still present in 2.6.31-rc8.
Reinette
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kernel-testers in
the body of a message to
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, reinette chatre wrote:
As you can see from the kernel version it is not a build of a vanilla
kernel. It only contains changes related to the wireless networking work
I am doing.
Here is the output:
Thanks, this is great. It pinpoints the problem very effectively.
[
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 19:24:50 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, reinette chatre wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 10:24 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Issue is still present in 2.6.31-rc8.
Is
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, reinette chatre wrote:
As you can see from the kernel version it is not a build of a
vanilla kernel. It only contains changes related to the wireless
networking work I am
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The code here is
16: 48 8b 80 00 01 00 00mov0x100(%rax),%rax
1d: 48 8b 50 08 mov0x8(%rax),%rdx
21: 48 85 d2test %rdx,%rdx
24: 74 11 je 0x37
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Theoretically i915_gem_idle should prevent any user interrupts from
coming in.
That is _entirely_ immaterial.
The thing is, interrupts can be shared. So it does not matter ONE WHIT
that you are trying to idle the hardware - there may be _other_
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Theoretically i915_gem_idle should prevent any user interrupts from
coming in.
That is _entirely_ immaterial.
The thing is, interrupts can be
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Yeah, saw that. I don't think that's the root cause though. If we see
a user interrupt after gem_idle is called we may have serious issues in
our command handling code.
Quite frankly, I do not understand why you seem to be making excuses for
code
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Yeah, saw that. I don't think that's the root cause though. If we
see a user interrupt after gem_idle is called we may have serious
issues in our
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 11:06 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
so this is TOTALLY UNTESTED!
I understand that the discussion is still going on whether this is the
right thing to do. Even so, I thought you may like to know that with
this patch I can again switch to console, back again, hibernate, and
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
And now, when I pinpointed exactly where the oops happens, and what
the cause is, you seem to be trying to hold things up. I wanted to do
the final 2.6.31 release yesterday, quite frankly I'm not in the
ling...@intel.com,
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org, Ma Ling
ling...@intel.com, Reinette Chatre reinette.cha...@intel.com
Subject: [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
If you didn't see it, then that means that we have screw-ups with the
bugzilla thing. You're
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 16:05 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Any chance you could
give it a try Reinette?
This patch also solves the issue for me.
Tested-by: Reinette Chatre reinette.cha...@intel.com
Thank you very much
Reinette
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:37:41 -0700
reinette chatre reinette.cha...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 11:06 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
so this is TOTALLY UNTESTED!
I understand that the discussion is still going on whether this is the
right thing to do. Even so, I thought you may
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 16:16 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Do you see hardware wedged messages in your log after using Linus's
patch? That's what I'd expect... ah no I see we don't call the
routine that requires interrupts in that path like I thought.
I can confirm that. While using this patch,
reinette.cha...@intel.com
Subject: [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
If you didn't see it, then that means that we have screw-ups with the
bugzilla thing. You're actually listed as a Reviewed-by on the commit
that the fixed-up bisection blamed - And I get the feeling
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
On Thursday 20 August 2009, reinette chatre wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:26 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30.
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:26 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
25 matches
Mail list logo
