Hi,
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:02:02 -0800, Nagaprabhanjan Bellari
nagp@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We had a problem where we were trying to debug why events/0 was taking
98%
of CPU time. I found that writing a ‘t’ to /proc/sysrq-trigger will
dump the
stack traces of all processes. Unfortunately,
-To: 1263290536.6890.16.ca...@development
References: 1263279212.1954.27.ca...@development
1263290536.6890.16.ca...@development
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Organization: Microbit
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:11:23 +1100
Message-ID: 1263359483.1940.8.ca...@development
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 21:02 +1100, Microbit_Ubuntu wrote:
As follow up,
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 17:53 +1100, Microbit_Ubuntu wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently started using USB keyboard on my embedded SAM9-L9260
board. Part reason is that I can send certain hard codes that are less
practical to send
Hi all,
I've already covered all of this in an earlier post, but here goes again
anyway :
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:40:16 +0530, hmthalib hmtha...@gmail.com wrote:
nidhi mittal hada wrote:
Can someone come and please clarify -- it finally
above chain of mail raises more confusion as conflict
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:58:20 -0700, C a.la.kaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, IMHO the processor does not decide or even know the size of
virtual address space.
Ofcourse it does. How else do you think it translates a virtual
address to a physical address? Virtual addresses are simply what the
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:13:03 +0530, askb ask...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:09 +0530, Siddu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Rick Brown rick.brow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Firstly, I'm trying to understand what exactly characterizes a
Hallo Mensch0815,
Does that mean you are human #0815 ?
Sounds rather Kafkaesque :-) :-)
B rgds
Kris
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:25:32 -0400, Anand Arumugam
anand.aru...@gmail.com
wrote:
You message just came thru via the newbies email list...
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Matze
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:13:32 +0530, sandeep lahane
sandeep.lah...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:32 AM, mayur nande mayur@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rick,
Some days ago i had the same question in my mind. While going through
The
Linux Kernel Architecture book (by Wolfgang
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:25:55 +0400, Denis Kirjanov kirja...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi dear list.
I encountered the following problem: from time to time I see a delay when
booting the kernel (~30s). It doesn't happen regularly.
I would like to ask you for advice as to what may be the reason for
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 01:10:48 -0700, Vivek Subbarao viv...@chelsio.com
wrote:
Hi,
The ip address assigned through ifconfig is not persistent. Why is the
behaviour so? Instead of editing files to add persistent addresses why
not make ifconfig add persistent addresses? Is there a
Hi Robert,
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 12:28:48 +0530, Siddu siddu.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Robert P. J. Day
rpj...@crashcourse.cawrote:
as a followup to my earlier post, here's something i want to
clarify. there's a difference in how much symbol-based debugging you
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:07:18 +0800, 付新荣 fuxinr...@skyworth.com
wrote:
hi,everybody.
I don't know why use the stmia sp, {r0, lr} instruction rather than
stmda sp, {r0, lr} in the macros vector_stub defined in file
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S.
becaue the sp register is point to the
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:24:42 +0530, H M Thalib hmtha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to trigger any interrupt in Linux without actually it is
happening. I want to test whether my modules interrupt handler is
working properly - without the hardware interrupt occurring.
Hi,
The only
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:24:05 +1000, micro...@virginbroadband.com.au
wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:24:42 +0530, H M Thalib hmtha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to trigger any interrupt in Linux without actually it is
happening. I want to test whether my modules interrupt handler is
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:28:21 +0400, Denis Borisevich dennis...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/7/27 Siddu siddu.s...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Denis Borisevich dennis...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you for reply but I think you got me wrong. I don't want to
submit my driver to mainline
I'm not sure about Linux (and am curious) but in C this is defined by the
heap size.
The heap normally is located between the end of (i)data and the lowest the
stack(s) can/might go (assuming a full descending stack).
This is decided at link time and is runtime constant.
Also note that -
I presume that llseek results from a seek() call ?
A seek() call implies (to me) the use of higher layer file I/O streams.
I don't think there's a way to inhibit the high level library from wanting
to call seek().
Also, note that some specific fread()/fwrite() sequences need a flush, or
at least a
Then what is nonseekable_open() for?
But that's not part of the ANSI file I/O. I gave this as a caveat.
I'm not familiar with this nonseekable option (and I can't actually see the
benefit of it in a proper file stream).
But you did specify use of your own char device driver - I think.
Perhaps
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:37:12 -0600, Asim linka...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like a processor independent solution. I figured out
cpu_frquency/HZ *2 should give me the answer.
That will be hard. You could rely on a free running timer, but then you are
tied to variations in HW again.
(although that
On a first approach these might help :
1.
To make sure that you're talking to the adapter type 'ifconfig'.
Any wlanX devices already installed or eth0, disable them with :
ifconfig down - where is eth0 and so on.
Do this until you only have 'lo' left in ifconfig
then activate your PCI
Hi,
I can't say 100% for sure your enumeration is broken, but it certainly
seems that way.
Before you debug too deep into the ECM or ACM side of your CDC, try using
USB Snoopy or some such on the enum process.
1. How can I ascertain that the enumeration has happened properly?
The dmesg log of
21 matches
Mail list logo
