>
> I forgot to mention, it's now possible to draw graphical polygons (not
> zones) both in pcbnew and in the footprint editor.
But Christmas isn't for another two months!!
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski <
tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I've just pushed a
This patch fixes a regression in commit 5c0edbaba (wow, that was a ways
back). Currently, pcbnew will cleanup duplicate tracks by deleting both
tracks, rather than just one of the duplicates. This patch ensures only
one of the two tracks will be deleted.
Fixes:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad
Dear all,
I've just pushed a set of patches that simplifies drawing and editing
custom pad shapes:
- Now you can draw a number of graphic primitives in the footprint
editor, select them together and R-click->Create Pad From Selected
Shapes) to convert them to a custom-shaped pad.
- ... and the o
Looks good to me. If there are no major objections I will merge this patch.
On 10/19/2017 11:53 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
> I tested the GetAssociatedDocument, works much better and has more
> features so i took the freedom of updating the dialog windows to use
> that instead of the wxLaunchDe
Le 19/10/2017 à 17:26, Maciej Sumiński a écrit :
> On 10/19/2017 05:20 PM, jp charras wrote:
>> Le 19/10/2017 à 16:59, Maciej Sumiński a écrit :
>>> On 10/19/2017 04:32 PM, jp charras wrote:
>>> [snip]
Hi Orson,
Could you have a look into this patch?
It fixes the issue when a ch
I tested the GetAssociatedDocument, works much better and has more
features so i took the freedom of updating the dialog windows to use
that instead of the wxLaunchDefaultBrowser as well
attaching patch :)
- Kristoffer
On 10/19/2017 02:07 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 10/19/2017 7:09 AM, Kri
On 10/19/2017 05:20 PM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 19/10/2017 à 16:59, Maciej Sumiński a écrit :
>> On 10/19/2017 04:32 PM, jp charras wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Hi Orson,
>>>
>>> Could you have a look into this patch?
>>> It fixes the issue when a change is committed with a item belonging a
>>> footprint.
Le 19/10/2017 à 16:59, Maciej Sumiński a écrit :
> On 10/19/2017 04:32 PM, jp charras wrote:
> [snip]
>> Hi Orson,
>>
>> Could you have a look into this patch?
>> It fixes the issue when a change is committed with a item belonging a
>> footprint.
>>
>> But I do not have very good knowledge of COMM
On 10/19/2017 04:32 PM, jp charras wrote:
[snip]
> Hi Orson,
>
> Could you have a look into this patch?
> It fixes the issue when a change is committed with a item belonging a
> footprint.
>
> But I do not have very good knowledge of COMMIT classes.
Hi Jean-Pierre,
Thank you for looking into t
Le 19/10/2017 à 12:55, Maciej Sumiński a écrit :
> On 10/19/2017 11:31 AM, jp charras wrote:
>> Le 18/10/2017 à 16:57, Oliver Walters a écrit :
>>> JP,
>>>
>>> Fantastic, you have worked your magic! That works much better in pcbnew
>>> now, the undo/redo is
>>> working well.
>>>
>>> However, I sti
Le 19/10/2017 à 13:00, jp charras a écrit :
> Le 19/10/2017 à 12:55, Maciej Sumiński a écrit :
>> On 10/19/2017 11:31 AM, jp charras wrote:
>>> Le 18/10/2017 à 16:57, Oliver Walters a écrit :
JP,
Fantastic, you have worked your magic! That works much better in pcbnew
now, the u
Hi Jean-Samuel,
I committed your code to the master branch. Thank you for your
contribution to KiCad.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 10/19/2017 4:30 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, corrected patch attached.
>
> Regards
> Le 18/10/2017 à 19:31, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> Hi Jean-Samuel,
>
On 10/19/2017 7:09 AM, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
> Yes indeed it breaks that, I would argue that having an "invisible"
> field opened when using the context field is the source of the
> confusion. So I am aware it breaks the context menu for old schematics
> but think it is necessary anyway.
I'm O
Yes indeed it breaks that, I would argue that having an "invisible" field
opened when using the context field is the source of the confusion. So I am
aware it breaks the context menu for old schematics but think it is
necessary anyway.
I can of course use GetAssociatedDocument instead.
On Oct 19,
Le 19/10/2017 à 12:55, Maciej Sumiński a écrit :
> On 10/19/2017 11:31 AM, jp charras wrote:
>> Le 18/10/2017 à 16:57, Oliver Walters a écrit :
>>> JP,
>>>
>>> Fantastic, you have worked your magic! That works much better in pcbnew
>>> now, the undo/redo is
>>> working well.
>>>
>>> However, I sti
On 10/19/2017 11:31 AM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 18/10/2017 à 16:57, Oliver Walters a écrit :
>> JP,
>>
>> Fantastic, you have worked your magic! That works much better in pcbnew now,
>> the undo/redo is
>> working well.
>>
>> However, I still see that undo/redo for zone editing is broken in modedit
Le 18/10/2017 à 20:20, Kristoffer Ödmark a écrit :
> Glad to hear it, I fixed a patch up that will highlight the differences a bit
> better than I explain it.
>
> Basically it will fill the field from the properties if the field is empty
> when adding components to
> the schematic.
>
> It will
Le 18/10/2017 à 16:57, Oliver Walters a écrit :
> JP,
>
> Fantastic, you have worked your magic! That works much better in pcbnew now,
> the undo/redo is
> working well.
>
> However, I still see that undo/redo for zone editing is broken in modedit.
>
> Oliver
>
Yes, because when an item belon
Hi,
Sorry, corrected patch attached.
Regards
Le 18/10/2017 à 19:31, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> Hi Jean-Samuel,
>
> There are a few coding policy violations in your patch.
>
> if( outline.OutlineCount() > 0) {
>
> should be:
>
> if( outline.OutlineCount() > 0 )
> {
>
> This occurs several ti
19 matches
Mail list logo
