In Pcbnew that is already the case, shift+R rotates the other way around.
Eeschema doesn't have that shortcut.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:15 PM Kevin Cozens wrote:
> On 2019-06-10 6:35 p.m., Andrew Lutsenko wrote:
> > I like to keep rotation angle set to 90 because that covers 98% of cases
> and
On 2019-06-10 6:35 p.m., Andrew Lutsenko wrote:
I like to keep rotation angle set to 90 because that covers 98% of cases and
is it's faster to press R two or three times instead of 4 or 6 times (I
frequently go the wrong way around since unfortunately R in pcbnew rotates
ccw and R in eeschema
Did you test the latest commit 2745a95b6b02c3864d6594503cc21619691cdd94?
On 6/10/19 6:02 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> It didn't seem to work for the use case I described on windows last week.
>
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 23:51, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>
>> Hey Tom,
>>
>> On 6/4/2019 12:31 PM,
Wayne,
I like to keep rotation angle set to 90 because that covers 98% of cases
and is it's faster to press R two or three times instead of 4 or 6 times (I
frequently go the wrong way around since unfortunately R in pcbnew rotates
ccw and R in eeschema rotates cw, that is something that should be
It didn't seem to work for the use case I described on windows last week.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 23:51, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> Hey Tom,
>
> On 6/4/2019 12:31 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> > On 04/06/2019 17:11, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Wayne,
> >>
> >> It looks like I screwed up
Hey Tom,
On 6/4/2019 12:31 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> On 04/06/2019 17:11, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
>
>> Hi Wayne,
>>
>> It looks like I screwed up the exception handler under KiCad windows
>> shell. Will fix soon.
>
> Fixed in my github branch.
>
> T.
>
I just finished testing this on
Andrew,
I'm not sure why you need a half step rotation when you can just change
the rotation angle to 45°. I'm not opposed to this change but given
that we are running out of hotkeys, I don't know if this is the best use
of them.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 6/9/2019 8:40 PM, Andrew Lutsenko wrote:
> I
Hello Wayne,
Am 10.06.19 um 20:15 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:
> We cannot make ngspice 30 the minimum version. There are far too many
> linux distros where 30 is not available yet. Please keep in mind,
> Debian stable and the latest Ubuntu LTS version are the benchmarks for
> dependency package
Ian,
If you can get it done by the freeze, then I don't have any issue with
this. Otherwise, it will have to wait until 5.1.4.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 6/9/2019 7:39 PM, Ian McInerney wrote:
> To add on to this, the hotkey validation architecture that I have been
> building up to take care of the
Le 10/06/2019 à 03:40, lê văn lập a écrit :
> Dear all DEV !
> I am currently designing pcb using zuken's cr5000 software, I would like
> to contribute to kicad's development, this is gerber when exported from
> cr5000, they use line and arc to create copper zones, hopefully this
> will is a good
On 6/9/2019 12:28 PM, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 09.06.19 um 09:03 schrieb Holger Vogt:
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> would you mind creating a new package for macOS 5.1.2 stable replacing
>> the outdated libngspice 26 by the recent libngspice version 30?
>>
>> And then use libngspice 30 also for
On 6/9/2019 10:27 AM, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> On 2019-05-22 16:37, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> We are getting a decent set of bug fixes in the 5.1 branch so we should
>> seriously start thinking about a 5.1.3 stable release by the end of
>> June. What I would like to see is push to fix some of the
I've rebased my patch to show the current grid setting, and I've generated it
both for the master branch and the 5.1 branch. The attached patches were
generated via git format-patch.
Please consider these patches for inclusion into KiCad, and please let me know
if there is anything that I
I made it a dash 2 pkgrel for windows, I suggest doing the same for the
macos package.
man. 10. jun. 2019 10.51 skrev Carsten Schoenert :
> Hi,
>
> Am 10.06.19 um 01:46 schrieb Ian McInerney:
> > Is there a reason that pushing a change like this can't wait until the
> > 5.1.3 release?
>
> that's
Hi,
Am 10.06.19 um 01:46 schrieb Ian McInerney:
> Is there a reason that pushing a change like this can't wait until the
> 5.1.3 release?
that's up to the packagers in my eyes and the severity of the issue. As
far I read the reason behind the request from Holger it's an important
enough update
15 matches
Mail list logo
