On 01/06/2014 10:46 PM, Marco Serantoni wrote:
On 06/gen/2014, at 21:27, Maciej Sumiński mailto:maciej.sumin...@cern.ch>> wrote
Thank you for the explanations. I expected that boost comes with KiCad
to make building easier for some users, but I did not even think of
bugs related to version of
On 06/gen/2014, at 21:27, Maciej Sumiński wrote
>
> Thank you for the explanations. I expected that boost comes with KiCad to
> make building easier for some users, but I did not even think of bugs related
> to version of the library.
Many of the issues I had on OSX are related to to wrong com
On 01/06/2014 07:58 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 1/6/2014 12:00 PM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
I can fully understand that it is much easier for many users not to deal
with building boost library, but on the other hand - there are many
others who do not need a separate copy of boost just for KiCad.
On 01/06/2014 06:34 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
I can fully understand that it is much easier for many users not to deal with
building boost library, but on the other hand - there are many others who do
not need a separate copy of boost just for KiCad.
.
On 1/6/2014 12:00 PM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> I can fully understand that it is much easier for many users not to deal
> with building boost library, but on the other hand - there are many
> others who do not need a separate copy of boost just for KiCad.
>
> As far as I know, there are 3 main rea
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> I can fully understand that it is much easier for many users not to deal with
> building boost library, but on the other hand - there are many others who do
> not need a separate copy of boost just for KiCad.
...
> I look forward to your opinions. I te
6 matches
Mail list logo
