On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 5:55 PM Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> On 11/20/19 7:11 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
>
> Ok, I'll look into making it configurable. However, I find the current
> default appearance hard to use, so maybe one could consider changing
> the defaults in that case?
>
> Everyone likes
On 11/20/19 7:11 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
Ok, I'll look into making it configurable. However, I find the current
default appearance hard to use, so maybe one could consider changing
the defaults in that case?
Everyone likes to have their preferences as the default. This is not a
useful
Ok, I'll look into making it configurable. However, I find the current
default appearance hard to use, so maybe one could consider changing
the defaults in that case?
Not only does it make the text easily legible, but also the whole
symbol less cluttered when selected. You can still select
I'm on the fence about the text highlighting, on the one hand not doing it
does make it so the text is still easily legible when selected, but on the
other it can be nice to show that it is part of the selected symbol. I
think this would definitely be a case where making it a configurable option
On 2019-11-20 05:48, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
Hi,
I'm tweaking the appearance of the new selection, what do you think?
Except a change of color, transparency and width, it also skips
drawing the fields and pin labels of components. I think it gives a
much cleaner look with less clutter.
This
On 01/08/19 20:00, Jeff Young wrote:
Hi Dino,
I’m torn on having a colour config for it. On the one hand it might help some
users who want to set a different colour, but on the other hand it won’t track
any system mode changes (such as dark mode on OSX).
The zoom level compensation was put
Hi Dino,
I’m torn on having a colour config for it. On the one hand it might help some
users who want to set a different colour, but on the other hand it won’t track
any system mode changes (such as dark mode on OSX).
The zoom level compensation was put in specifically to make things look
Le 01/08/2019 à 06:54, Jeff Young a écrit :
> Hi JP,
>
> I’ve pushed another version which uses the platform selection colour (blue on
> OSX). Let me know how that looks on your machine.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
Much better now.
Thanks.
>
>> On 30 Jul 2019, at 12:04, jp charras wrote:
>>
>>
Hi Jeff,
On Linux (debian) looks good (a kind of light blue) until you don't
select the same blue as background color, so this seems a good default,
but having it configurable in the color selection will help in that case
(consideried also that load/save of color schemes is coming soon).
A
Hi JP,
I’ve pushed another version which uses the platform selection colour (blue on
OSX). Let me know how that looks on your machine.
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 30 Jul 2019, at 12:04, jp charras wrote:
>
> Le 30/07/2019 à 05:01, Jeff Young a écrit :
>> Hi Nhat,
>>
>> The colours of the “shadows”
Le 30/07/2019 à 05:01, Jeff Young a écrit :
> Hi Nhat,
>
> The colours of the “shadows” are the same as the elements themselves —
> so they can be configured the normal way.
>
> And yes, the shadow width scales with the zoom factor. It’s not 100%
> the same across all zoom sizes as it looks
Hi Nhat,
The colours of the “shadows” are the same as the elements themselves — so they
can be configured the normal way.
And yes, the shadow width scales with the zoom factor. It’s not 100% the same
across all zoom sizes as it looks more consistent if it’s bumped up a little a
larger zooms.
OK, I tried a bunch of things out. None of them were terribly satisfactory.
Bolding sounded good, but turned out to be even less noticeable than the
brightening.
The yellow "drop-shadow" looked good on unfilled symbols, but was completely
unnoticeable on symbols with a background fill (which
Oh, hey, I like the bold idea. Did you try it out? (I can if not….)
> On 25 Jul 2019, at 21:02, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
>
> On 2019-07-19 19:03, Jeff Young wrote:
>
>> I’ve been thinking of using the magenta colour for both net
>> highlighting and cross-probing, and then using the bright red
On 2019-07-19 19:03, Jeff Young wrote:
I’ve been thinking of using the magenta colour for both net
highlighting and cross-probing, and then using the bright red we use
today for cross-probing for selection. This does mean that selections
would no longer have differentiated colours within
Many options would be better than the current selection color, which as you
mentioned is not noticeable using the default color palette.
Your proposal above sounds good to me. A single color for multiple
elements, if it catches the eye, would be better than not being able to
find the highlighted
16 matches
Mail list logo
