On 30/10/2014 08:50, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:22:34AM +0100, Benoît Roehr wrote:
Beware here, they are not footprint anymore when they are on the
board, have a value, a reference and so on... They are components.
Footprint is the right term for the standalone print
On 30/10/2014 13:13, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 10/30/2014 6:54 AM, Benoît Roehr wrote:
On 30/10/2014 08:50, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:22:34AM +0100, Benoît Roehr wrote:
Beware here, they are not footprint anymore when they are on the
board, have a value, a reference
On 29/10/2014 23:56, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Another patch:
=== modified file 'pcbnew/class_pcb_layer_widget.cpp'
--- pcbnew/class_pcb_layer_widget.cpp 2014-09-14 15:34:37 +
+++ pcbnew/class_pcb_layer_widget.cpp 2014-10-29 22:52:43 +
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@
RR( _( Anchors ),
It takes about 20 seconds for me.
Ubuntu 14.04
i7 @ 2.2GHz
I've read somewhere linux is better for compiling because of something
called pipelining. It is present on linux (or better implemented) but
not on windows.
On 22/10/2014 15:01, Tim Hutt wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do some kicad
On 20/10/2014 16:48, Adam Wolf wrote:
Hi folks,
Has anyone gotten KiCad to work with CLion? It's a new C++ IDE by the
Jetbrains folks.
I took a look at CLion this afternoon. I didn't tried it but it looks
very very promising.
I spent a few minutes this weekend, but I couldn't get it to
Hi Adam,
I'm now on a Ubuntu 14.04 daily. Just tell me what to test exactly and
how... But there is chance I'll build Kicad today so dependencies may be
installed on this machine today.
Also: wx3.0 is available in the official repositories now (I use synaptic)
2014-10-18 15:20 GMT+02:00 Adam
For the love of G-d, whatever you do, don't adopt that Altium Season
scheme ... Summer 2011 and what-not. Is Winter 2011 earlier or later
than Winter 2010? What hemisphere are you in? I'm perfectly fine with
the dotted-triplet thing, Major.minor.more-minor -a
Yes, and also these make you fell
Not a dev, but my 2 femto cents:
I really like the #major.#minor.#dev - #buildNo scheme, but I would add
these details about the version incrementation:
2.0
New release, majors changes over the 1.9.
2.1.0
Stable release with new features and bug fixes over 2.0.0.
2.1.25
Development version,
On 20/10/2014 18:53, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 10/20/2014 12:38 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
2014-10-20 18:07 GMT+02:00 Benoît Roehr benoit.roehr...@gmail.com:
Not a dev, but my 2 femto cents:
I really like the #major.#minor.#dev - #buildNo scheme, but I would add
these details about
Is this manufacturer panelizing artworks of different client ?
If the technician in charge of the data processing forgot to clip the
silkscreen by project, it is possible that what you have on you board
are in fact circles from another client board.
Le 16/10/2014 08:40, Nick Østergaard a
-16 11:17 GMT+02:00 Benoît Roehr benoit.roehr...@gmail.com
mailto:benoit.roehr...@gmail.com:
Is this manufacturer panelizing artworks of different client ?
If the technician in charge of the data processing forgot to
clip the
silkscreen by project, it is possible that what you
Le 15/10/2014 07:23, Mark Roszko a écrit :
I'm leaning towards one of the markdown formats myself.
I vote for markdown :D
Me too !!
In fact, here, I ran a quick convert of ODT to markdown and imported
it into a gitbook setup. Here's chapter 1 and 2 being served from
markdown and combined
, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Benoît Roehr
benoit.roehr...@gmail.com mailto:benoit.roehr...@gmail.com wrote:
In KiCAD each project can have its own library of footprints,
so this idea duplicates, that exist already.
OK thanks ! I did not know about it before :)
Le 13/10/2014 13
Le 13/10/2014 03:50, Carl Poirier a écrit :
Is component the official naming? What about symbol?
I remember when I started using EDAs, I was looking for symbol menu to
put things on schematic. I think I was looking for symbol because we
call symbol what we draw on a schematic. Imo Component
/display/DEV/Building+KiCad+on+Linux
Thanks a lot for your help guys :)
Le 10/10/2014 15:41, Benoît Roehr a écrit :
Hello guys,
My problem with wxWidget 3.0 and CMake continues, I've tried to make
this work for at least 10 hours now, and can't find any solution
anywhere. I'm too noob with linux
In KiCAD each project can have its own library of footprints, so this idea
duplicates, that exist already.
OK thanks ! I did not know about it before :)
Le 13/10/2014 13:21, LordBlick a écrit :
In response to a message written on 13.10.2014 12:04, from Benoît Roehr:
Le 13/10/2014 11:40
. Otherwise, the cmake module that finds wxWidgets will
find the first one it discovers which in you case is 2.8.12. The
other
option it to remove the the wxWidgets 2.8.12 development package.
On 10/10/2014 11:34 AM, Benoît Roehr wrote:
Aw sorry everyone. I just noticed my
AM, Benoît Roehr wrote:
Hello guys,
My problem with wxWidget 3.0 and CMake continues, I've tried to make
this work for at least 10 hours now, and can't find any solution
anywhere. I'm too noob with linux for the moment.
List of what I tried:
Installing latest wxWidget package (3.0.2
Hello guys,
My problem with wxWidget 3.0 and CMake continues, I've tried to make
this work for at least 10 hours now, and can't find any solution
anywhere. I'm too noob with linux for the moment.
List of what I tried:
Installing latest wxWidget package (3.0.2)
Removing wx2.8
, I've installed wxWidget 3.0.2 Trusty (i'm on u14.04) using
Synaptic. Do I need to change something else manually ? For me it looks
like cmake try to use the last wx version which is still installed...
Le 10/10/2014 15:41, Benoît Roehr a écrit :
Hello guys,
My problem with wxWidget 3.0 and CMake
Le 09/10/2014 08:36, Lorenzo Marcantonio a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:33:39PM +0200, Benoît Roehr wrote:
Does someone have a turnkey solution for building and running eeschema alone
? Can it be done by tweaking winbuilder ? (help help !)
Well, if you only touch eeschema the rebuild
Hello dear developers.
Le 08/10/2014 10:08, Andrew Zonenberg a écrit :
Second the vote for consistency, no matter which way it goes.
Personally, I have a slight preference for footprint over module as
well.
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:56 +1100, Mitch Davis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:47 PM,
Le 08/10/2014 19:40, Andy Peters a écrit :
On Oct 8, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Mark Roszko mark.ros...@gmail.com wrote:
I use footprint myself. Though footprint seems to imply what a PCB
must have in order to accommodate a part, eg, pads, silk. Are the 3d
models part of this? If they are, then
Hello, dear developers,
I have some ideas of improvement for the Schematic editor. Making C++ in
microcontrollers is no problem for me but I know very little about
software compilation for x86 platforms. I'll will also need to learn
about wxWidget :D
Does someone have a turnkey solution for
Hello everyone,
First of all I really want to thank you all for the great improvements
KiCad had recently. The last time I tried to use it (about a year ago) I
made the decision to return to Altium because of the lake of important
features.
Now that CERN is also on board, switching to KiCad,
Frenchie ;)
Can you elaborate more on what aspects of Kicad you didn't like the
most the last time?
a+, Alexei.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Benoît Roehr benoit.roehr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everyone,
First of all I really want to thank you all for the great improvements
KiCad
had
26 matches
Mail list logo
