On 4/16/2018 9:35 AM, Gustavo Bruno wrote:
> 2018-04-11 10:46 GMT-03:00 Wayne Stambaugh :
>> On 4/11/2018 9:23 AM, Strontium wrote:
>>> Who pays for that, and who holds it is another question. But if it
>>> happens, we should clearly define what's allowed and what's not. For
>>> example, if you
On 2018-04-16 07:33, Mark Roszko wrote:
>> "No national law applies" could be either difficult or beneficial for KiCad
>> in the case of an infringement.
>
> That doesn't prevent CERN's right as an entity to assert trademark claims in
> any country where they registered as an entity and claimed
> "No national law applies" could be either difficult or beneficial for
KiCad in the case of an infringement.
That doesn't prevent CERN's right as an entity to assert trademark claims
in any country where they registered as an entity and claimed trademarks
via applications.
The same way me as an
Hi everyone!
Glad to see Hilary reached out. Have been talking with her about CERN
logos, KiCad activities and ensuring everything is on the up-and-up for
donations.
Happy to discuss other ideas on how to fundraise in the future and build
community, please feel free to contact me off thread. If t
Hi,
On 04/11/2018 01:51 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> We really don't have any legal entity to own the
> trademark so I suspect that is why it has not happened up to this point.
I'm fine with CERN handling this, but if a legal entity to hold
trademarks is needed, we can also talk to Software in t
Hi!
On 2018-04-11 16:06, jp charras wrote:
> I am fine to register Kicad under CERN.
> (I am not especially interested in having it under my name.)
I am wondering if there might be legal difficulties in the case of trademark
enforcement procedures, because of some "special" legal state of CERN o
On 4/11/2018 10:06 AM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 11/04/2018 à 15:46, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> On 4/11/2018 9:23 AM, Strontium wrote:
>>> On a practical note, the bigger the profile of KiCad gets, the more
>>> likely some a-hole tries to trademark kicad out from under the project
>>> for their own
Le 11/04/2018 à 15:46, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> On 4/11/2018 9:23 AM, Strontium wrote:
>> On a practical note, the bigger the profile of KiCad gets, the more
>> likely some a-hole tries to trademark kicad out from under the project
>> for their own perceived benefit (Or just simply to be an a-ho
On 4/11/2018 9:23 AM, Strontium wrote:
> On a practical note, the bigger the profile of KiCad gets, the more
> likely some a-hole tries to trademark kicad out from under the project
> for their own perceived benefit (Or just simply to be an a-hole). It
> happens.
>
> So it's probably a good idea
On a practical note, the bigger the profile of KiCad gets, the more
likely some a-hole tries to trademark kicad out from under the project
for their own perceived benefit (Or just simply to be an a-hole). It
happens.
So it's probably a good idea to get the trademark just to protect the
proje
10 matches
Mail list logo
