There's no substitute for process. Where I work, the rule is that 2 sets of
eyes check every schematic symbol. Just because the symbol has a pin labeled
reset and it's on pin 1 doesn't mean that the datasheet agrees with the symbol.
Also, two sets of eyes are required to check every package
I have developed a formal method of checking designs. It's very
tedious, but providing you can stay awake and don't skip things you're
certain are correct it seems to be pretty good at finding problems.
You also have to stay calm when you get yet another automated telephone
call
Yes, please!
- Anders Gustafsson
Engineer, CNE6, ASE
Pedago, The Aaland Islands (N60 E20)
www.pedago.fi
phone +358 18 12060
mobile +358 40506 7099
fax +358 18 14060
Robert birmingham_spi...@gmx.net 2010-02-10 19:50
If anyone is interested I'll upload the necessary file to Yahoo
Im usually a very consciencious guy and very formatted with processes for
RD. This comes from big companies where I worked.
However, now Im working alone and thats not easy to find a second eyes
pair !
However with time we can achieve the good at first time
As I was in a hurry for
Just to let you know I'm preparing some instructions for my own formal
method which I will upload in the next few days. I'm trying to write
them so they could be used by a beginner rather than just slapping a
file on the server and leaving it for people to figure out for
themselves, so it
When I make a change to a part in a library that's already been placed in the
schematic, I can't seem to get the part properties to be updated in the
schematic (and more importantly the netlist), even when I clear the cache. In
browsing the .sch file with notepad, the problem seems to be that
When I print on my hp color laser printer the net names over the power symbols
appear as little lines, like . It doesn't do it on my BW HP color laser
printer, but it's much less easy to read overall. Any help would be very much
appreciated.
Thanks,
Brian Keeney
