[kicad-users] Re: Completely depressing !

2010-02-10 Thread giordano.george
There's no substitute for process.  Where I work, the rule is that 2 sets of 
eyes check every schematic symbol.  Just because the symbol has a pin labeled 
reset and it's on pin 1 doesn't mean that the datasheet agrees with the symbol.

Also, two sets of eyes are required to check every package symbol.  Pin 1 has 
to be where pin 1 of the drawing says it's supposed to be.  And, of course, 
every dimension of the package has to match the drawing.

The problem I see, because I'm (lots of us are) doing home-brew designs outside 
of work, is that there's no second set of eyes to check these things. If you're 
using this tool at work, then have someone take the datasheet and hi-lite every 
pin in both the datasheet and the schematic symbol.  Likewise for the footprint 
symbol.  Then, file these away with the design documentation so there's no 
second-guessing by management later when there's an error.  You could do this 
at home as well but whenever the same set of eyes does the making and checking, 
there's a much greater chance of an error sneaking through.

Of course, when the symbol and package have 1152 pins, everyone runs screaming 
the other way when I show up in their office to request a symbol check.

It's discipline and process that separates the amateurs from the pro's.  So, 
develop a process, even if you're on your own, and follow it rigorously.

--- In kicad-users@yahoogroups.com, Stephrac74 stephra...@... wrote:

 Hi guys,
 
  
 
 I would like to share with you my very bad experience in order to help you
 to avoid becoming completely depressed as I am now…
 
  
 
 I've been working about 50 hours on a PCB using Kicad and the libraries
 found on the soundforge. I've a TFQP microcontroller in my design and used
 the module found in microchip-2 library called TQFP64 ! I've not checked
 before drawing the PCB that the module was ok…. And what a mistake !
 
  
 
 The module is wrong, dimensions are not correct making the component
 impossible to mount and solder ! I can of course correct this by changing
 the module, but using Kicad this means erasing all the wires connected there
 and restart most of my design (very compact). I think about 20h more to
 spend on this PCB…
 
 That is absolutely dramatic for a professional use as spending 70h on a such
 basic PCB with around 100 components !
 
  
 
 So my best advice is to redesign all your modules and not spend one minute
 using the libs you can find in Kicad or on the web. There are so many errors
 that you discover all along your design (silkcreens, wrong dimensions, …)
 making finally a massive waste of time. Of course, If I knew that before I
 would have redesigned all the components and created my own libs…
 
  
 
 Hoping it will prevent some other people to face what I'm facing now ! 
 
  
 
  
 
 Best
 
 Stephane





Re: [kicad-users] Re: Completely depressing !

2010-02-10 Thread Robert
I have developed a formal method of checking designs.   It's very 
tedious, but providing you can stay awake and don't skip things you're 
certain are correct it seems to be pretty good at finding problems. 
You also have to stay calm when you get yet another automated telephone 
call congratulating you on winning a cruise in the Caribbean.

If anyone is interested I'll upload the necessary file to Yahoo groups 
(along with instructions).

Regards,

Robert.

giordano.george wrote:
 There's no substitute for process.  Where I work, the rule is that 2 sets of 
 eyes check every schematic symbol.  Just because the symbol has a pin labeled 
 reset and it's on pin 1 doesn't mean that the datasheet agrees with the 
 symbol.
 
 Also, two sets of eyes are required to check every package symbol.  Pin 1 has 
 to be where pin 1 of the drawing says it's supposed to be.  And, of course, 
 every dimension of the package has to match the drawing.
 
 The problem I see, because I'm (lots of us are) doing home-brew designs 
 outside of work, is that there's no second set of eyes to check these things. 
 If you're using this tool at work, then have someone take the datasheet and 
 hi-lite every pin in both the datasheet and the schematic symbol.  Likewise 
 for the footprint symbol.  Then, file these away with the design 
 documentation so there's no second-guessing by management later when there's 
 an error.  You could do this at home as well but whenever the same set of 
 eyes does the making and checking, there's a much greater chance of an error 
 sneaking through.
 
 Of course, when the symbol and package have 1152 pins, everyone runs 
 screaming the other way when I show up in their office to request a symbol 
 check.
 
 It's discipline and process that separates the amateurs from the pro's.  So, 
 develop a process, even if you're on your own, and follow it rigorously.
 
 --- In kicad-users@yahoogroups.com, Stephrac74 stephra...@... wrote:
 Hi guys,

  

 I would like to share with you my very bad experience in order to help you
 to avoid becoming completely depressed as I am now…

  

 I've been working about 50 hours on a PCB using Kicad and the libraries
 found on the soundforge. I've a TFQP microcontroller in my design and used
 the module found in microchip-2 library called TQFP64 ! I've not checked
 before drawing the PCB that the module was ok…. And what a mistake !

  

 The module is wrong, dimensions are not correct making the component
 impossible to mount and solder ! I can of course correct this by changing
 the module, but using Kicad this means erasing all the wires connected there
 and restart most of my design (very compact). I think about 20h more to
 spend on this PCB…

 That is absolutely dramatic for a professional use as spending 70h on a such
 basic PCB with around 100 components !

  

 So my best advice is to redesign all your modules and not spend one minute
 using the libs you can find in Kicad or on the web. There are so many errors
 that you discover all along your design (silkcreens, wrong dimensions, …)
 making finally a massive waste of time. Of course, If I knew that before I
 would have redesigned all the components and created my own libs…

  

 Hoping it will prevent some other people to face what I'm facing now ! 

  

  

 Best

 Stephane

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Please read the Kicad FAQ in the group files section before posting your 
 question.
 Please post your bug reports here. They will be picked up by the creator of 
 Kicad.
 Please visit http://www.kicadlib.org for details of how to contribute your 
 symbols/modules to the kicad library.
 For building Kicad from source and other development questions visit the 
 kicad-devel group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kicad-develYahoo! Groups 
 Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
 Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2679 - Release Date: 02/10/10 
 07:40:00
 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2679 - Release Date: 02/10/10 
07:40:00


Sv: Re: [kicad-users] Re: Completely depressing !

2010-02-10 Thread Anders Gustafsson
Yes, please!

- Anders Gustafsson
  Engineer, CNE6, ASE
  Pedago, The Aaland Islands (N60 E20)
  www.pedago.fi
  phone +358 18 12060
  mobile +358 40506 7099
  fax +358 18 14060
 


 Robert birmingham_spi...@gmx.net 2010-02-10 19:50 
If anyone is interested I'll upload the necessary file to Yahoo groups 
(along with instructions).



RE: Re: [kicad-users] Re: Completely depressing !

2010-02-10 Thread Stephrac74
I’m usually a very consciencious guy and very formatted with processes for
RD. This comes from big companies where I worked.

However, now I’m working alone and that’s not easy to find a second eyes
pair !

 

However with time we can achieve the “good at first time”

 

As I was in a hurry for this project, I’ve made some short circuits in the
process …. And I shouldn’t ! 

 

 

I would be please to see your process too Robert.

 

Best

Stephane

www.hamradio-experiments.com

 

 

De : kicad-users@yahoogroups.com [mailto:kicad-us...@yahoogroups.com] De la
part de Anders Gustafsson
Envoyé : mercredi 10 février 2010 18:53
À : kicad-users@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Sv: Re: [kicad-users] Re: Completely depressing !

 

  

Yes, please!

- Anders Gustafsson
Engineer, CNE6, ASE
Pedago, The Aaland Islands (N60 E20)
www.pedago.fi
phone +358 18 12060
mobile +358 40506 7099
fax +358 18 14060


 Robert birmingham_spi...@gmx.net mailto:birmingham_spider%40gmx.net 
2010-02-10 19:50 
If anyone is interested I'll upload the necessary file to Yahoo groups 
(along with instructions).



 


---
Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.

 

image001.jpgimage002.jpg

Re: [kicad-users] Re: Completely depressing !

2010-02-10 Thread Robert
Just to let you know I'm preparing some instructions for my own formal 
method which I will upload in the next few days.   I'm trying to write 
them so they could be used by a beginner rather than just slapping a 
file on the server and leaving it for people to figure out for 
themselves, so it will take me a little while.

Although it's better to get someone else to check your work, sometimes 
you have no choice.

Regards,

Robert.

Stephrac74 wrote:
 I’m usually a very consciencious guy and very formatted with processes for
 RD. This comes from big companies where I worked.
 
 However, now I’m working alone and that’s not easy to find a second eyes
 pair !
 
  
 
 However with time we can achieve the “good at first time”
 
  
 
 As I was in a hurry for this project, I’ve made some short circuits in the
 process …. And I shouldn’t ! 
 
  
 
  
 
 I would be please to see your process too Robert.
 
  
 
 Best
 
 Stephane
 
 www.hamradio-experiments.com
 
  
 
  
 
 De : kicad-users@yahoogroups.com [mailto:kicad-us...@yahoogroups.com] De la
 part de Anders Gustafsson
 Envoyé : mercredi 10 février 2010 18:53
 À : kicad-users@yahoogroups.com
 Objet : Sv: Re: [kicad-users] Re: Completely depressing !
 
  
 
   
 
 Yes, please!
 
 - Anders Gustafsson
 Engineer, CNE6, ASE
 Pedago, The Aaland Islands (N60 E20)
 www.pedago.fi
 phone +358 18 12060
 mobile +358 40506 7099
 fax +358 18 14060
 
 
 Robert birmingham_spi...@gmx.net mailto:birmingham_spider%40gmx.net 
 2010-02-10 19:50 
 If anyone is interested I'll upload the necessary file to Yahoo groups 
 (along with instructions).
 
 
 
  
 
 
 ---
 Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail.
 Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté.
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
 Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2679 - Release Date: 02/10/10 
 07:40:00
 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2679 - Release Date: 02/10/10 
07:40:00


[kicad-users] How to force update of schematic file when changing part in library?

2010-02-10 Thread keeneybrian
When I make a change to a part in a library that's already been placed in the 
schematic, I can't seem to get the part properties to be updated in the 
schematic (and more importantly the netlist), even when I clear the cache.  In 
browsing the .sch file with notepad, the problem seems to be that there is 
another copy of the part in the schematic file itself.  Is there any way to 
force a new reading of the library?  Otherwise, I need to delete every part and 
reinsert them in the schematic, which is problematic on a number of levels.  

Things that I'm sure of:
1.  I've cleared the cache numerous times
2.  I've made triply sure that my library is able to by found by the schematic 
program (it's in the project root, and I've rerouted the path in the config 
file)

Any help would be much appreciated!

Thanks,
Brian Keeney



[kicad-users] EEschema printing error-- Net names over power symbols appear as -----

2010-02-10 Thread keeneybrian
When I print on my hp color laser printer the net names over the power symbols 
appear as little lines, like .  It doesn't do it on my BW HP color laser 
printer, but it's much less easy to read overall.  Any help would be very much 
appreciated.

Thanks,
Brian Keeney