Re: [Kim-discussion] Large KB Gazetteer

2012-06-18 Thread Keith Cortis
ssion' Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Large KB Gazetteer Keith, Please make sure you are executing it with the "DISTINCT" keyword. When I do without "DISTINCT" I also get 329 results. I will look into the other problem in a moment. Hth, Philip On 18 Jun

Re: [Kim-discussion] Large KB Gazetteer

2012-06-18 Thread Philip Alexiev
> character (as provided in the examples below), although even the mentioned > issue is important. > > Thanks a lot for your replies. > > Keith > > > From: Philip Alexiev [mailto:philip.alex...@ontotext.com] > Sent: 18 June 2012 13:52 > To: Keith Cortis

Re: [Kim-discussion] Large KB Gazetteer

2012-06-18 Thread Keith Cortis
discussion] Large KB Gazetteer Keith, When I executed this sparql query over the provided sparql endpoint (http://dbpedia.org/sparql) I got exactly 305 results. Could you double check to confirm that you get 329 ? Thanks, Philip On 18 Jun 2012, at 1:56 PM, Keith Cortis wrote:

Re: [Kim-discussion] Large KB Gazetteer

2012-06-18 Thread Philip Alexiev
Keith, When I executed this sparql query over the provided sparql endpoint (http://dbpedia.org/sparql) I got exactly 305 results. Could you double check to confirm that you get 329 ? Thanks, Philip On 18 Jun 2012, at 1:56 PM, Keith Cortis wrote: > Hi Philip, > > Thanks for your quick reply

Re: [Kim-discussion] Large KB Gazetteer - information about the gazetteer size/system configuration

2012-03-28 Thread Philip Alexiev
Hello Fabian, Unfortunately we do not have benchmarks on the gazetteer. The general setup is with a dictionary of 50 - 100 k aliases, in which case the performance is good even on a desktop machine. The performance of the gazetteer depends on the dictionary size and does not depend on the n

[Kim-discussion] Large KB Gazetteer - information about the gazetteer size/system configuration

2012-03-28 Thread Fabian Cretton
Dear all, I am running the large KB Gazetteer smoothly on my desktop computer with 8GB Ram, for 2 millions alias, on a small text file of 20 lines. With this configuration, the standard Gate gazetteer already won't do the job. Is it possible to have some little examples of what can be done wit

Re: [Kim-discussion] Large KB Gazetteer

2012-03-26 Thread Philip Alexiev
Hello Fabian, This is the right place to ask questions related to the LKB gazetteer, as it is developed by Ontotext. I will apply my answers inline - under your questions. On 26 Mar 2012, at 9:18 AM, Fabian Cretton wrote: > Dear all, > > I write to this list as this seems to be the place to a

[Kim-discussion] Large KB Gazetteer

2012-03-25 Thread Fabian Cretton
Dear all, I write to this list as this seems to be the place to ask questions about the large KB Gazetteer. This question is not directly related to KIM, thank you to redirect me to a more appropriate list if needed. I have only done little tests with the large KB Gazetteer in Gate (not with