Re: [Kim-discussion] Strange behaviour for two PRs in KIM customized IE pipeline

2012-09-05 Thread JIE GAO
Thanks, philip, that makes sense to me. Regards JIE GAO Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:34:56 +0300 From: philip.alex...@ontotext.com To: myfamily2...@hotmail.com CC: kim-discussion@ontotext.com Subject: Re: [Kim-discussion] Strange behaviour for two PRs in KIM customized IE pipeline

Re: [Kim-discussion] Strange behaviour for two PRs in KIM customized IE pipeline

2012-09-03 Thread Philip Alexiev
Hello Jie Gao, Can you send an example pipeline (including the documents in it) that demonstrates these cases.It will be very helpful for understanding the context. Thank you, Philip Alexiev Software Engineer, KIM team On 08/31/2012 01:16 PM, JIE GAO wrote: Hi, ontotext team: I am

[Kim-discussion] Strange behaviour for two PRs in KIM customized IE pipeline

2012-08-31 Thread JIE GAO
Hi, ontotext team: I am currently evaluating KIM 3.6-SNAPSHOT. I've found that two KIM customized GATE PRs have strange behaviour for me. The one is KIM OrthoMatcher and another is Instance Generator. The scenario is that i customized many JAPE grammars based on KIM default Jape grammar PR.