Re: [klee-dev] KLEE Crashing

2018-02-22 Thread Daniel Schwartz
Hi Martin,

Done. Thank you again.


Thanks,
Daniel




*
Daniel Schwartz - ds3...@columbia.edu
M.S. Candidate, Computer Science
Columbia University, 2018
https://www.linkedin.com/in/danielschwartz2/

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Martin Nowack  wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> This is strange - hanging at __libc_fork() with 100% cpu load should not
> happen.
> Can you open a bug report on GitHub and we try to continue there?
>
> * And could you add there what system you have (Linux distribution)
> * Add the code around:  __libc_fork () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/
> linux/x86_64/../fork.c:130,
>   I would like to know what’s going on there.
>
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Martin
>
> > On 22. Feb 2018, at 19:37, Daniel Schwartz 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I looked again to see if I missed a child process of this fork but
> didn't. I provided all the information I have below:
> >
> > When I check the running processes, I see:
> > 9667: klee-1.4.0_build_dir/bin/klee --libc=uclibc --posix-runtime
> --simplify-sym-indices --write-cvcs --write-cov --output-module
> --max-memory=4096 --disable-inlining --use-forked-solver --use-cex-cache
> --allow-external-sym-calls --max-sym-array-size=4096
> --max-instruction-time=30. --max-time=9 --watchdog
> --max-memory-inhibit=false --max-solver-time=1 --max-static-fork-pct=1
> --max-static-solve-pct=1 --max-static-cpfork-pct=1 --switch-type=internal
> --dump-states-on-halt=false --search=random-path --search=nurs:covnew
> --use-batching-search --batch-instructions=1 
> --output-dir=/jpeg-9s-jpeg_hang_test
> --min-query-time-to-log=-1 --track-instruction-time=true
> libjpeg-read-klee.bc A -sym-files 1 1024 --sym-stdin 32
> >
> > 9668: klee-1.4.0_build_dir/bin/klee --libc=uclibc --posix-runtime
> --simplify-sym-indices --write-cvcs --write-cov --output-module
> --max-memory=4096 --disable-inlining --use-forked-solver --use-cex-cache
> --allow-external-sym-calls --max-sym-array-size=4096
> --max-instruction-time=30. --max-time=9 --watchdog
> --max-memory-inhibit=false --max-solver-time=1 --max-static-fork-pct=1
> --max-static-solve-pct=1 --max-static-cpfork-pct=1 --switch-type=internal
> --dump-states-on-halt=false --search=random-path --search=nurs:covnew
> --use-batching-search --batch-instructions=1 
> --output-dir=/jpeg-9s-jpeg_hang_test
> --min-query-time-to-log=-1 --track-instruction-time=true
> libjpeg-read-klee.bc A -sym-files 1 1024 --sym-stdin 32
> >
> >
> > It's process 9668 that is using 100% CPU and the backtrace as above, is:
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0  0x2b160169ce34 in __libc_fork () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/
> linux/x86_64/../fork.c:130
> > #1  0x0080f2a8 in runAndGetCexForked (timeout=0,
> hasSolution=@0x7fff287aeaff: false, values=std::vector of length 0,
> capacity 0, objects=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...},
> > q=0x1b0aceda0, builder=0x53e8290, vc=0x531e1c0) at
> /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/STPSolver.cpp:234
> > #2  klee::STPSolverImpl::computeInitialValues (this=0x5b9d5d0,
> query=..., objects=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...},
> values=std::vector of length 0, capacity 0,
> > hasSolution=@0x7fff287aeaff: false) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/
> lib/Solver/STPSolver.cpp:355
> > #3  0x007fccc1 in CexCachingSolver::getAssignment
> (this=this@entry=0x5d57ac0, query=..., result=@0x7fff287aec40: 0x8886130)
> > at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CexCachingSolver.cpp:227
> > #4  0x007fd89c in CexCachingSolver::computeTruth
> (this=0x5d57ac0, query=..., isValid=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
> > at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CexCachingSolver.cpp:311
> > #5  0x007fbade in CachingSolver::computeTruth (this=0x5c31250,
> query=..., isValid=@0x7fff287aeecf: false) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/
> lib/Solver/CachingSolver.cpp:234
> > #6  0x008095f3 in IndependentSolver::computeTruth
> (this=0x5ea53e0, query=..., isValid=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
> > at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/IndependentSolver.cpp:430
> > #7  0x005ad77f in klee::TimingSolver::mustBeTrue
> (this=0x5d589f0, state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
> > at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:58
> > #8  0x005ad9e1 in klee::TimingSolver::mustBeFalse
> (this=0x5d589f0, state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
> > at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:67
> > #9  0x005ada58 in klee::TimingSolver::mayBeTrue (this= out>, state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fff287aef7f: true)
> > at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:73
> > #10 0x0058ef95 in klee::Executor::executeInstruction
> (this=this@entry=0x5fac0a0, state=..., ki=ki@entry=0x4b3a9b0)
> > at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:1734
> > #11 0x0059005e in klee::Executor::run (this=this@entry=0x5fac0a0,
> initialState=...) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executo

Re: [klee-dev] KLEE Crashing

2018-02-22 Thread Martin Nowack
Hi Daniel,

This is strange - hanging at __libc_fork() with 100% cpu load should not happen.
Can you open a bug report on GitHub and we try to continue there?

* And could you add there what system you have (Linux distribution)
* Add the code around:  __libc_fork () at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/../fork.c:130,
  I would like to know what’s going on there. 


Thanks a lot,
Martin

> On 22. Feb 2018, at 19:37, Daniel Schwartz  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I looked again to see if I missed a child process of this fork but didn't. I 
> provided all the information I have below:
> 
> When I check the running processes, I see:
> 9667: klee-1.4.0_build_dir/bin/klee --libc=uclibc --posix-runtime 
> --simplify-sym-indices --write-cvcs --write-cov --output-module 
> --max-memory=4096 --disable-inlining --use-forked-solver --use-cex-cache 
> --allow-external-sym-calls --max-sym-array-size=4096 
> --max-instruction-time=30. --max-time=9 --watchdog 
> --max-memory-inhibit=false --max-solver-time=1 --max-static-fork-pct=1 
> --max-static-solve-pct=1 --max-static-cpfork-pct=1 --switch-type=internal 
> --dump-states-on-halt=false --search=random-path --search=nurs:covnew 
> --use-batching-search --batch-instructions=1 
> --output-dir=/jpeg-9s-jpeg_hang_test --min-query-time-to-log=-1 
> --track-instruction-time=true libjpeg-read-klee.bc A -sym-files 1 1024 
> --sym-stdin 32
> 
> 9668: klee-1.4.0_build_dir/bin/klee --libc=uclibc --posix-runtime 
> --simplify-sym-indices --write-cvcs --write-cov --output-module 
> --max-memory=4096 --disable-inlining --use-forked-solver --use-cex-cache 
> --allow-external-sym-calls --max-sym-array-size=4096 
> --max-instruction-time=30. --max-time=9 --watchdog 
> --max-memory-inhibit=false --max-solver-time=1 --max-static-fork-pct=1 
> --max-static-solve-pct=1 --max-static-cpfork-pct=1 --switch-type=internal 
> --dump-states-on-halt=false --search=random-path --search=nurs:covnew 
> --use-batching-search --batch-instructions=1 
> --output-dir=/jpeg-9s-jpeg_hang_test --min-query-time-to-log=-1 
> --track-instruction-time=true libjpeg-read-klee.bc A -sym-files 1 1024 
> --sym-stdin 32
> 
> 
> It's process 9668 that is using 100% CPU and the backtrace as above, is:
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x2b160169ce34 in __libc_fork () at 
> ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/../fork.c:130
> #1  0x0080f2a8 in runAndGetCexForked (timeout=0, 
> hasSolution=@0x7fff287aeaff: false, values=std::vector of length 0, capacity 
> 0, objects=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...}, 
> q=0x1b0aceda0, builder=0x53e8290, vc=0x531e1c0) at 
> /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/STPSolver.cpp:234
> #2  klee::STPSolverImpl::computeInitialValues (this=0x5b9d5d0, query=..., 
> objects=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...}, values=std::vector of 
> length 0, capacity 0, 
> hasSolution=@0x7fff287aeaff: false) at 
> /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/STPSolver.cpp:355
> #3  0x007fccc1 in CexCachingSolver::getAssignment 
> (this=this@entry=0x5d57ac0, query=..., result=@0x7fff287aec40: 0x8886130)
> at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CexCachingSolver.cpp:227
> #4  0x007fd89c in CexCachingSolver::computeTruth (this=0x5d57ac0, 
> query=..., isValid=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
> at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CexCachingSolver.cpp:311
> #5  0x007fbade in CachingSolver::computeTruth (this=0x5c31250, 
> query=..., isValid=@0x7fff287aeecf: false) at 
> /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CachingSolver.cpp:234
> #6  0x008095f3 in IndependentSolver::computeTruth (this=0x5ea53e0, 
> query=..., isValid=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
> at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/IndependentSolver.cpp:430
> #7  0x005ad77f in klee::TimingSolver::mustBeTrue (this=0x5d589f0, 
> state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
> at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:58
> #8  0x005ad9e1 in klee::TimingSolver::mustBeFalse (this=0x5d589f0, 
> state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
> at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:67
> #9  0x005ada58 in klee::TimingSolver::mayBeTrue (this= out>, state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fff287aef7f: true)
> at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:73
> #10 0x0058ef95 in klee::Executor::executeInstruction 
> (this=this@entry=0x5fac0a0, state=..., ki=ki@entry=0x4b3a9b0)
> at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:1734
> #11 0x0059005e in klee::Executor::run (this=this@entry=0x5fac0a0, 
> initialState=...) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:2947
> #12 0x005908fe in klee::Executor::runFunctionAsMain (this= out>, f=, argc=7, argv=0x5eb57c0, envp=)
> at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:3762
> #13 0x005626ff in main (argc=37, argv=0x7fff287af928, envp= out>) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/tools/klee/main.cpp:1461
> 
> I don't see any childre

Re: [klee-dev] KLEE Crashing

2018-02-22 Thread Daniel Schwartz
Hi,

I looked again to see if I missed a child process of this fork but didn't.
I provided all the information I have below:

When I check the running processes, I see:
9667: klee-1.4.0_build_dir/bin/klee --libc=uclibc --posix-runtime
--simplify-sym-indices --write-cvcs --write-cov --output-module
--max-memory=4096 --disable-inlining --use-forked-solver --use-cex-cache
--allow-external-sym-calls --max-sym-array-size=4096
--max-instruction-time=30. --max-time=9 --watchdog
--max-memory-inhibit=false --max-solver-time=1 --max-static-fork-pct=1
--max-static-solve-pct=1 --max-static-cpfork-pct=1 --switch-type=internal
--dump-states-on-halt=false --search=random-path --search=nurs:covnew
--use-batching-search --batch-instructions=1
--output-dir=/jpeg-9s-jpeg_hang_test
--min-query-time-to-log=-1 --track-instruction-time=true
libjpeg-read-klee.bc A -sym-files 1 1024 --sym-stdin 32

9668: klee-1.4.0_build_dir/bin/klee --libc=uclibc --posix-runtime
--simplify-sym-indices --write-cvcs --write-cov --output-module
--max-memory=4096 --disable-inlining --use-forked-solver --use-cex-cache
--allow-external-sym-calls --max-sym-array-size=4096
--max-instruction-time=30. --max-time=9 --watchdog
--max-memory-inhibit=false --max-solver-time=1 --max-static-fork-pct=1
--max-static-solve-pct=1 --max-static-cpfork-pct=1 --switch-type=internal
--dump-states-on-halt=false --search=random-path --search=nurs:covnew
--use-batching-search --batch-instructions=1
--output-dir=/jpeg-9s-jpeg_hang_test
--min-query-time-to-log=-1 --track-instruction-time=true
libjpeg-read-klee.bc A -sym-files 1 1024 --sym-stdin 32


It's process 9668 that is using 100% CPU and the backtrace as above, is:
(gdb) bt
#0  0x2b160169ce34 in __libc_fork () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/
linux/x86_64/../fork.c:130
#1  0x0080f2a8 in runAndGetCexForked (timeout=0,
hasSolution=@0x7fff287aeaff: false, values=std::vector of length 0,
capacity 0, objects=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...},
q=0x1b0aceda0, builder=0x53e8290, vc=0x531e1c0) at
/home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/STPSolver.cpp:234
#2  klee::STPSolverImpl::computeInitialValues (this=0x5b9d5d0, query=...,
objects=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...}, values=std::vector of
length 0, capacity 0,
hasSolution=@0x7fff287aeaff: false) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/
lib/Solver/STPSolver.cpp:355
#3  0x007fccc1 in CexCachingSolver::getAssignment
(this=this@entry=0x5d57ac0,
query=..., result=@0x7fff287aec40: 0x8886130)
at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CexCachingSolver.cpp:227
#4  0x007fd89c in CexCachingSolver::computeTruth (this=0x5d57ac0,
query=..., isValid=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CexCachingSolver.cpp:311
#5  0x007fbade in CachingSolver::computeTruth (this=0x5c31250,
query=..., isValid=@0x7fff287aeecf: false) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/
lib/Solver/CachingSolver.cpp:234
#6  0x008095f3 in IndependentSolver::computeTruth (this=0x5ea53e0,
query=..., isValid=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/IndependentSolver.cpp:430
#7  0x005ad77f in klee::TimingSolver::mustBeTrue (this=0x5d589f0,
state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:58
#8  0x005ad9e1 in klee::TimingSolver::mustBeFalse (this=0x5d589f0,
state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fff287aeecf: false)
at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:67
#9  0x005ada58 in klee::TimingSolver::mayBeTrue (this=, state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fff287aef7f: true)
at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:73
#10 0x0058ef95 in klee::Executor::executeInstruction
(this=this@entry=0x5fac0a0, state=..., ki=ki@entry=0x4b3a9b0)
at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:1734
#11 0x0059005e in klee::Executor::run (this=this@entry=0x5fac0a0,
initialState=...) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:2947
#12 0x005908fe in klee::Executor::runFunctionAsMain
(this=, f=, argc=7, argv=0x5eb57c0,
envp=)
at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:3762
#13 0x005626ff in main (argc=37, argv=0x7fff287af928,
envp=) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/tools/klee/main.cpp:1461

I don't see any children process for 9668.


The backtrace for 9667 is:
(gdb) bt
#0  0x2b160169cd30 in __nanosleep_nocancel () at
../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
#1  0x2b160169cbe4 in __sleep (seconds=0) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/
sleep.c:137
#2  0x00561432 in main (argc=37, argv=0x7fff287af928,
envp=0x7fff287afa58) at /home/dschwartz/klee-1.4.0/tools/klee/main.cpp:1185


Thanks in advance for any help!




Best,
Daniel

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Daniel Schwartz 
wrote:

> Thank you Martin.
>
> Here is the backtrace from gdb:
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x2b5816da8e34 in __libc_fork () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linu
> x/x86_64/../fork.c:130
> #

Re: [klee-dev] KLEE Crashing

2018-02-18 Thread Daniel Schwartz
Thank you Martin.

Here is the backtrace from gdb:
(gdb) bt
#0  0x2b5816da8e34 in __libc_fork () at
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/../fork.c:130
#1  0x0080f0b8 in runAndGetCexForked (timeout=0,
hasSolution=@0x7fffb2ea1cbf: false, values=std::vector of length 0,
capacity 0, objects=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...},
q=0x203ec87b0, builder=0x43cbd00, vc=0x4c35bc0) at
[redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/STPSolver.cpp:234
#2  klee::STPSolverImpl::computeInitialValues (this=0x51dc920, query=...,
objects=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1 = {...}, values=std::vector of
length 0, capacity 0,
hasSolution=@0x7fffb2ea1cbf: false) at [redacted]
/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/STPSolver.cpp:355
#3  0x007fcad1 in CexCachingSolver::getAssignment
(this=this@entry=0x4c62390,
query=..., result=@0x7fffb2ea1e00: 0x7bf40a0)
at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CexCachingSolver.cpp:227
#4  0x007fd6ac in CexCachingSolver::computeTruth (this=0x4c62390,
query=..., isValid=@0x7fffb2ea208f: false)
at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CexCachingSolver.cpp:311
#5  0x007fb8ee in CachingSolver::computeTruth (this=0x4fc9850,
query=..., isValid=@0x7fffb2ea208f: false) at [redacted]/
klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/CachingSolver.cpp:234
#6  0x00809403 in IndependentSolver::computeTruth (this=0x51783e0,
query=..., isValid=@0x7fffb2ea208f: false)
at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Solver/IndependentSolver.cpp:430
#7  0x005ad58f in klee::TimingSolver::mustBeTrue (this=0x3860df0,
state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fffb2ea208f: false)
at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:58
#8  0x005ad7f1 in klee::TimingSolver::mustBeFalse (this=0x3860df0,
state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fffb2ea208f: false)
at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:67
#9  0x005ad868 in klee::TimingSolver::mayBeTrue (this=, state=..., expr=..., result=@0x7fffb2ea213f: true)
at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/TimingSolver.cpp:73
#10 0x0058ef95 in klee::Executor::executeInstruction
(this=this@entry=0x431b240, state=..., ki=ki@entry=0x4b4f8a0)
at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:1734
#11 0x0059005e in klee::Executor::run (this=this@entry=0x431b240,
initialState=...) at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:2947
#12 0x005908fe in klee::Executor::runFunctionAsMain
(this=, f=, argc=7, argv=0x49ae670,
envp=)
at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/lib/Core/Executor.cpp:3762
#13 0x005626ff in main (argc=36, argv=0x7fffb2ea2ae8,
envp=) at [redacted]/klee-1.4.0/tools/klee/main.cpp:1461


Here are the last 3 lines of gdb output from running:
$ gdb attach [pid]
Loaded symbols for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
0x2b5816da8e34 in __libc_fork () at
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/../fork.c:130
130 ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/../fork.c: No such file or
directory.




*
Daniel Schwartz - ds3...@columbia.edu
M.S. Candidate, Computer Science
Columbia University, 2018
https://www.linkedin.com/in/danielschwartz2/

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:00 AM, Martin Nowack  wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> KLEE is not crashing but the timeout (--max-time=10800) is reached.
> The thing what happens in your case is that the KLEE watchdog process
> tries to kill KLEE vie attaching to it using gdb. So KLEE does not
> terminate or does not have enough time to terminate.
>
> It could be that KLEE is waiting on an external call which does not return.
> Try to attach via gdb to the KLEE process (remember you have to take the
> child pid) and make a backtrace so we would know more.
>
> For this one, you have to change the ptrace_scope:
>
> > KLEE: WARNING: KLEE: WATCHDOG: time expired, attempting halt via gdb
> >
> > Could not attach to process.  If your uid matches the uid of the target
> > process, check the setting of /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope, or try
> > again as the root user.  For more details, see
> /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf
> > ptrace: Operation not permitted.
>
> Best,
> Martin
> ---
> Martin Nowack
> Research Assistant
>
> Technische Universität Dresden
> Computer Science
> Institute of Systems Architecture
> Systems Engineering
> 01062 Dresden
>
> Phone: +49 351 463 39608
> Email: martin.nowa...@tu-dresden.de
> 
>
>
___
klee-dev mailing list
klee-dev@imperial.ac.uk
https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/klee-dev


Re: [klee-dev] KLEE Crashing

2018-02-14 Thread Martin Nowack
Hi Daniel,

KLEE is not crashing but the timeout (--max-time=10800) is reached.
The thing what happens in your case is that the KLEE watchdog process tries to 
kill KLEE vie attaching to it using gdb. So KLEE does not terminate or does not 
have enough time to terminate.

It could be that KLEE is waiting on an external call which does not return.
Try to attach via gdb to the KLEE process (remember you have to take the child 
pid) and make a backtrace so we would know more.

For this one, you have to change the ptrace_scope:

> KLEE: WARNING: KLEE: WATCHDOG: time expired, attempting halt via gdb
> 
> Could not attach to process.  If your uid matches the uid of the target
> process, check the setting of /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope, or try
> again as the root user.  For more details, see /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf
> ptrace: Operation not permitted.

Best,
Martin
---
Martin Nowack
Research Assistant

Technische Universität Dresden
Computer Science
Institute of Systems Architecture
Systems Engineering
01062 Dresden

Phone: +49 351 463 39608
Email: martin.nowa...@tu-dresden.de




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
klee-dev mailing list
klee-dev@imperial.ac.uk
https://mailman.ic.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/klee-dev