On 2022.11.14 07:25, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
On Samstag, 12. November 2022 16:48:15 CET Jack via KMyMoney-devel
wrote:
> On 11/12/22 09:27, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
> > [snip ...]
>
What's the best way to report these issues? I've put some i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461841
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
Summary|Ability to mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461762
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
Summary|Option "Always
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461749
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
Displaying a "Cancel" button is trivial. Having a button on the Configure
dialog that totally closes the report without generating results is probably
not difficult. However, creating a button on the report
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461749
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
This does work, but if I open the config dialog for a report I decide not to
modify, there is no way to close the report quickly, since closing the config
dialog starts the complete report generation. I know I could modify
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461762
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
The stable releases are currently from the 5.1 branch, which gets bug fixes,
but not new features. The nightly build is from master branch, which should be
considered a work in progress, with new features. While
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461749
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
The problem right now is that you CAN right click on the report name and
select Configure, but it runs the full report before displaying the configure
dialog. Going straight to the dialog first would be a good solution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461749
Bug ID: 461749
Summary: Allow interruption of report generation
Classification: Applications
Product: kmymoney
Version: git (master)
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461559
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
Perhaps leave the control where it is, but add some text to the dialog
specifying the limitations of where it has an effect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
bugs?
Jack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461536
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
It makes sense to omit the Date column when transactions are not shown, as
would always be empty in that case. Omitting the lead-in "Total" would work,
but I think might confuse people looking at the final repo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461536
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384323
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461559
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ostroffjh@users.sourceforge |
|.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387367
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461559
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385090
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
tly in
today's 5.1 appimage.
Jack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461557
--- Comment #8 from Jack ---
Thanks for the follow-up. Windows doesn't know anything about Linux users and
permissions, so Windows itself may well have thought it had full permissions,
as long as it was able to mount the share. Windows was happy
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461557
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359874
--- Comment #12 from Jack ---
I don't recall when this was originally filed, but it seems to me KMM is acting
as designed. If I have an imported transactions with the same amount, close
date, but different name/payee, I personally would NOT want
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362263
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
CC|ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461536
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461557
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461392
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460562
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461294
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
You cannot create a transaction prior to the opening date of the account. I
believe the default opening date for a new account is the first day of the
current month. Because that problem is so common, and it is possible
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455470
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312649
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312649
--- Comment #22 from Jack ---
I will also add that there are other cases where KMM does not allow for some
action, where it is often not obvious why. I'll just mention that now, but if
only one gets solved at some time, a separate bug can be opened
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460952
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460952
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Your screen shot is not helpful - I don't know if it's too large/too
small/wrong resolution, but I only see a blur. On Linux, the ledger lens works
fine for me. Have you tried adjusting the column widths in the ledger
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359641
--- Comment #8 from Jack ---
OK - I over focused on the copying to create a new transaction. The underlying
issue is as Thomas said - once a price entry is created by creating a new
transaction, there is no longer any connection between the price
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458298
--- Comment #15 from Jack ---
*** Bug 460853 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460853
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
CC|ostroffjh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359641
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ostroffjh@users.sourceforge |
|.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460853
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440060
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362084
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359641
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
On 2022.10.08 17:52, Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
On 2022.10.08 17:15, Dawid Wrobel wrote:
I created an account with https://developer.chase.com and am about
to send a message, asking if they could look into our case. The
FinTS precedent could help.
FYI, I sent out the following
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343108
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
This actually sounds like correct behavior to me. Perhaps something has
changed since this bug was filed, but changing the memo of a split should not
change the memo of the transaction.
First, I want to be sure
e password, this is the first time I've had to enter a
password for an already mapped account.
Should I open a new bug for this?
Jack
On 2022.10.12 16:10, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
On Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2022 21:53:01 CEST Jack via KMyMoney-devel
wrote:
> I've been working with my contact at Merrill Lynch to try to at
least
> be able to talk with someone with some technical knowledge, and I
any lines dealing with dtstart, although I may
well have misread that log and/or be looking at the wrong file.
Any thoughts? With the recent discussions about the Open Banking
related changes, I don't want to lose access to accounts that still
work with direct connect.
Jack
On 10/10/22 12:34, Dawid Wrobel wrote:
> Perhaps some pop-up on needing a password telling why it might not
be there if it used to be, and at least a pointer to instructions on
how to migrate, if possible.
The problem is that it would have to show only once, and for all
users, as we won't
On 10/10/22 12:23, Dawid Wrobel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 6:16 PM Jack via KMyMoney-devel
wrote:
I don't know why I didn't notice this earlier, but if I don't
want to
type all my passwords again, are there instructions for how I
would go
about migrating them
I don't know why I didn't notice this earlier, but if I don't want to
type all my passwords again, are there instructions for how I would go
about migrating them? (on Linux, KDE Plasma)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460079
--- Comment #8 from Jack ---
Sorry, I forgot you were on Windows. You can get a windows version from master
branch at https://binary-factory.kde.org/job/KMyMoney_Nightly_win64/. The same
caveat applies.
Also, if you reply to a bug by email, please
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460079
--- Comment #6 from Jack ---
Thomas' commit was to master branch, which will not be in a release for a
while. However, it looks like the commit can be backported/cherry-picked to
the 5.1 branch, in which case it would be in the 5.1.4 release, not yet
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460131
--- Comment #4 from Jack ---
Importing my ML OFX file with multiple accounts "just works." :-) If you look
into the file, you can see there is a section for each account, so some
combination of libofx and KMM know what to do. The dat
and Merrill Lynch over the past weeks, and I have not yet
spoken to anyone who has the slightest clue what I'm talking about,
much less has the authority to even begin discussing such a request.
Jack
On 2022.10.08 17:04, Dawid Wrobel via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 10:27 PM Jack via KMyMoney-devel <
kmymoney-devel@kde.org> wrote:
While direct connect using ONLY name/password may not be considered
safe, I can think of ways to still use Direct Connect wi
On 2022.10.08 17:15, Dawid Wrobel via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 10:37 PM Jack via KMyMoney-devel <
kmymoney-devel@kde.org> wrote:
Almost three years old, but
>
>
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/12/mint-late-stage-adversarial-interoperability-demonstrates
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460131
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
You're missing one shortcut. If you configure your browser to open the OFX or
QFX file in KMyMoney directly instead of saving it, you save that step.
The hard part of your request is that I don't believe there is a single
Almost three years old, but
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/12/mint-late-stage-adversarial-interoperability-demonstrates-what-we-had-and-what-we
seems relevant, if a bit outdated.
On 2022.10.08 16:26, Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
While direct connect using ONLY name/password may
discussion.)
I wonder if FSF and/or EFF might take any interest in the direction
this is going.
Jack
On 2022.10.08 16:13, Dawid Wrobel via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
Hi,
Are there any US banks and investment
> brokers which still support OFX direct connect, and are not likely
to
> follow t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460131
Bug ID: 460131
Summary: Make it possible/easier to open account's web site to
download transactions
Classification: Applications
Product: kmymoney
Version: git (master)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354674
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
?id=378076 and the link in it discuss
reasons why you might not actually want to do this, as well as
instructions for how you might accomplish a similar effect.
Jack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460108
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
of the change by Intuit - which is kind of silly if
you're not using Quicken. Are there any US banks and investment
brokers which still support OFX direct connect, and are not likely to
follow the herd?
Jack
On 2022.10.07 17:07, Brendan Coupe via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
Thanks Dawid,
I made
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460079
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|NET WORTH REPORTS ARE |Net Worth reports are
|DROPPING
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418479
--- Comment #11 from Jack ---
JAH - at this point, 5.0.6 is pretty old, and OpenSUSE should have some 5.1
version released. Can you check if this still happens in a newer version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416800
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458995
--- Comment #9 from Jack ---
I'm not sure what the right resolution should be here, as it seems the
underlying problem is a bank that issues OFX files that do not follow the
standard. Given the low probability of getting the bank to change anything
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416800
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
In particular, 5.0.6 is very old, and newer versions are available for Windows.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459866
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
When I open
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459781
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459772
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
There have been
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457640
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431300
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
Reading my reply now, I realize it wasn't complete accurate in describing
things. I apologize for that.
Part of the issue is a potential confusion with terminology. Any ownership of
a stock (or mutual fund) requires
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440452
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
I'm not sure that marking a category so it can no longer be used is quite the
same as closing an account. Closed accounts (depending on the state of "Show
all accounts" do not show up on any dropdown or list.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458995
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
Well, both statements include "CHECKING" which is clearly wrong for
the credit card account. I don't know if there is any point in your trying to
get the bank to fix it's software.
One possible thin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458995
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
On 2022.09.14 02:20, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
On Sonntag, 11. September 2022 23:05:42 CEST Jack Ostroff via
KMyMoney-devel wrote:
> Somehow I ended up with a stock with one name in the Equities tab of
> the Investment View, but a different name (same symbol and
On 9/14/22 02:20, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
On Sonntag, 11. September 2022 23:05:42 CEST Jack Ostroff via
KMyMoney-devel wrote:
> Somehow I ended up with a stock with one name in the Equities tab of
> the Investment View, but a different name (same symbol and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406223
--- Comment #6 from Jack ---
Created attachment 152035
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=152035=edit
simple csv file to demonstrate bug
I think you can demonstrate the bug importing this csv file into any Investment
Account.
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406223
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Platform|Ubuntu Packages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459006
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
I have
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406223
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.clu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Jack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238454
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456002
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426181
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
If that commit actually fixed the problem, should this be closed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457640
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458995
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
be allowed to be different from the Equity from which it ws derived,
and which is still it's parent.
Second, display details in a ledger should always (my opinion, open for
discussion) be taken from the security accunt and not the parent
equity, especially if they can differ.
Thoughts?
Jack
the Scheculed transactions section of the Home View.
Jack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458298
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #13 from Jack ---
Adjusting
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458152
--- Comment #9 from Jack ---
I don't think the split number matters. I have only a vague memory of dealing
with a similar problem some time age. Pending another response from Thomas,
what I would suggest, after making a backup of your data file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458166
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
Adjusting
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457394
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WORKSFORME
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458884
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432883
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457395
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
With the recent (days ago) release of libofx-0.10.6, the appimage build error
has changed. I know there is an immanent 0.10.7 coming due to 0.10.6 somehow
not providing it's version information properly, but the error log
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458654
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Error when importing qif|Error when Import QIF
|file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458680
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
On 9/4/22 09:44, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
Jack,
On Montag, 29. August 2022 21:05:30 CEST Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
The edit security dialog has a dropdown for price entry: "Price per
share," "Total for all shares," or "(default)". Where i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458447
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458683
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Comment on attachment 151812
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=151812
Screenshot - Crash, Choose multiple recipients, Choose Standardcategorie, Offer
Category
My German is inadequate, but it might be use
501 - 600 of 2617 matches
Mail list logo
