Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-02-03 Thread Mason James
On 16-01-31 5:58 pm, Joel Coehoorn wrote: Firefox and Opera use their own trusted certificate store, ignoring the operating system. Aah, thanks for explaining that. I was curious as to *why* it was working?! :p NO ONE should be using XP any more, and if you are moving to a new OS needs to

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-02-02 Thread Paul A
At 07:04 AM 2/2/2016 +0100, Mirko Tietgen wrote: Paul, Paul A schrieb am 31.01.2016 > a) Win XP has a market penetration of one in every nine or ten > computers world wide; According to w3cschools.com, Windows XP has a marketshare of 2,3% (December 2015)[1] W3 is "collected from W3Schools'

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-02-01 Thread Mirko Tietgen
Paul, Paul A schrieb am 31.01.2016 > a) Win XP has a market penetration of one in every nine or ten > computers world wide; According to w3cschools.com, Windows XP has a marketshare of 2,3% (December 2015)[1] > I might guess that this percentage is higher > outside the "Western world" where

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-01-30 Thread Mirko Tietgen
Hi, Paul A schrieb am 30.01.2016 > It appears that the Koha/Let's encrypt certificate will never > work on WinXP No, it won't. XP was dead before LE was born. It will probably not work for other ancient stuff, like pyramids. Wikipedia[1] says > On April 14, 2009, Windows XP exited mainstream

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-01-30 Thread Paul A
At 12:03 PM 1/29/2016 -0500, Owen Leonard wrote: > Thanks Chris, but... it is the latest version of Opera (34, both .deb and win) When I check Opera 34 on Windows I see no SSL error. Solved -- or at least I've maybe got to the bottom of this. I now have Opera running on Ubuntu, Debian and

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-01-30 Thread Paul A
Mirko, Please re-read what I wrote (and you cut out): a) Win XP has a market penetration of one in every nine or ten computers world wide; I might guess that this percentage is higher outside the "Western world" where libraries are perhaps just as important, or more so, than in "developed

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-01-30 Thread Joel Coehoorn
Firefox and Opera use their own trusted certificate store, ignoring the operating system. NO ONE should be using XP any more, and if you are moving to a new OS needs to be a priority. XP may *seem* to work just fine for you, but it no longer gets any system patches... even critical security

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-01-30 Thread Mason James
On 16-01-31 8:58 am, Mirko Tietgen wrote: Hi, Paul A schrieb am 30.01.2016 It appears that the Koha/Let's encrypt certificate will never work on WinXP No, it won't. XP was dead before LE was born. It will probably not work for other ancient stuff, like pyramids. Hi, I can access the Koha

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-01-29 Thread Paul A
At 01:52 PM 1/29/2016 +1300, Chris Cormack wrote: * Paul A (pau...@navalmarinearchive.com) wrote: > For wiki.koha-community.org, Opera has started giving a SSL Error: > > Your connection is not private > You attempted to reach wiki.koha-community.org, but the server presented an > invalid

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-01-29 Thread Owen Leonard
> Thanks Chris, but... it is the latest version of Opera (34, both .deb and win) When I check Opera 34 on Windows I see no SSL error. -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org ___ Koha mailing list

[Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-01-28 Thread Paul A
For wiki.koha-community.org, Opera has started giving a SSL Error: Your connection is not private You attempted to reach wiki.koha-community.org, but the server presented an invalid certificate. You cannot proceed because the website operator has requested heightened security for this domain.

Re: [Koha] Wiki certificate

2016-01-28 Thread Chris Cormack
* Paul A (pau...@navalmarinearchive.com) wrote: > For wiki.koha-community.org, Opera has started giving a SSL Error: > > Your connection is not private > You attempted to reach wiki.koha-community.org, but the server presented an > invalid certificate. > You cannot proceed because the website