https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
--- Comment #15 from Katrin Fischer ---
(In reply to danield from comment #14)
> I've also noticed these inconsistencies and I think this would be something
> good to fix. It seems to still exist in the 19.11 schema.
>
> Another thin
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
dani...@brimbank.vic.gov.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dani...@brimbank
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
--- Comment #13 from Katrin Fischer ---
(In reply to Jon Knight from comment #12)
> I'm just trawling through old REOPENed cases and I see that the current
> (17.05) borrower schema still has the inconsistencies in the addresses. As
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
Jon Knight changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j.p.kni...@lboro.ac.uk
--- Comm
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
--- Comment #11 from Nicole C. Engard ---
Well originally I was just reporting the address fields.
`address` mediumtext NOT NULL,
`address2` text,
`city` mediumtext NOT NULL,
`B_address` varchar(100) default NULL,
`B_address
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
--- Comment #10 from Katrin Fischer ---
Maybe it would be easier to have separate bugs then for fields that need to be
increased in size?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are watching al
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
Nicole C. Engard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolutio
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de|gmcha...@gmail.com
--- Comme
