----- Original Message -----
From: secr(MG!) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 9:31 PM
Subject: [mobilize-globally] Amazon anti-union campaign
Subject:
[MLNews!*] [SOLE] Fwd: Amazon anti-union campaign
Date:
Mon, 04 Dec 2000 05:17:02 -1200
From:
"Claudia K White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization:
Angelfire (http://email.angelfire.mailcity.lycos.com:80)
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------- Forwarded Message ---------
DATE: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 11:46:08
From: Lee Erica Byron Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Student Org for Labor Econ and Equality <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
we might want to find out if someone is organizing a boycott?
>Amazon Fights Union Activity
>http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/29/technology/29AMAZ.html
>
>November 29, 2000
>
>By STEVEN GREENHOUSE
>
>Amazon.com has come out swinging in its fight to stop a new
>unionization drive, telling employees that unions are a greedy,
>for-profit business and advising managers on ways to detect when a
>group of workers is trying to back a union.
>
> A section on Amazon's internal Web site gives supervisors
>antiunion material to pass on to employees, saying that unions mean
>strife and possible strikes and that while unions are certain to
>charge expensive dues, they cannot guarantee improved wages or
>benefits.
>
> The Web site advises managers on warning signs that a union is
>trying to organize. Among the signs that Amazon notes are "hushed
>conversations when you approach which have not occurred before,"
>and "small group huddles breaking up in silence on the approach of
>the supervisor."
>
> Other warning signs, according to the site, are an increase in
>complaints, a decrease in quality of work, growing aggressiveness
>and dawdling in the lunchroom and restrooms.
>
> Amazon, one of the leaders in electronic retailing, has stepped up
>its antiunion activities the last week after two unions and an
>independent organizing group announced plans to speed efforts to
>unionize Amazon during the holiday e-shopping rush. The organizing
>drive is the most ambitious one ever undertaken in the high-
>technology sector, where the nation's labor movement has yet to
>establish a foothold.
>
> The Communications Workers of America has undertaken a campaign to
>unionize 400 customer-service representatives in Seattle, where
>Amazon is based. The United Food and Commercial Workers Union and
>the Prewitt Organizing Fund, an independent organizing group, are
>seeking to unionize some 5,000 workers at Amazon's eight
>distribution centers across the country. The unionization drive has
>gained momentum because many workers are upset about layoffs at
>Amazon last January and about the sharp drop in the value of their
>stock options.
>
> One chapter on Amazon's internal Web site, which provides a rare
>internal glimpse at how a company is fighting off a union, is
>headlined, "Reasons a Union is Not Desirable."
>
> "Unions actively foster distrust toward supervisors," the Web site
>says. "They also create an uncooperative attitude among associates
>by leading them to think they are `untouchable' with a union."
>
> The Web site, which calls the company's workers associates, adds:
>"Unions limit associate incentives. Merit increases are contrary to
>union philosophy."
>
> A union supporter who insisted on anonymity and acknowledged
>seeking to embarrass the company over its antiunion campaign made a
>copy of the Web site material available to The New York Times.
>Amazon officials confirmed that the material came from the
>company's Web site.
>
> Patty Smith, an Amazon spokeswoman, said the main purpose of the
>Web site material was to tell supervisors what they can do to
>oppose a union and what actions by managers violate laws barring
>retaliation against workers who support unionization.
>
> For instance, the Web site said supervisors could tell workers
>that the company preferred to deal with them directly, rather than
>through an outside organization.
>
> It also said supervisors could tell workers about the benefits
>they enjoy. As for the don'ts, the Web site warns supervisors not
>to threaten workers with firings or reduce income or discontinue
>any privileges to any union supporter.
>
> Ms. Smith declined to name the lawyers the company had hired to
>work on the material.
>
> Union leaders said in interviews yesterday that their organizing
>drive was going somewhat worse than they had expected largely
>because of the unexpected aggressiveness of Amazon's antiunion
>efforts. Over the last two weeks, managers have held a half-dozen
>"all hands" meetings for customer service workers in Seattle, where
>managers have argued how unionizing would be bad for Amazon.
>
> Marcus Courtney, co-founder of the Washington Alliance of
>Technological Workers, an affiliate of the communications workers'
>union, said, "This shows how Amazon, despite its public statements
>that this is a decision we let our employees make themselves and we
>trust them to make the right decisions, all these meetings and the
>internal Web site and their manuals show that Amazon management is
>trying to take this basic democratic decision away from the workers
>and make it themselves."
>
> Ms. Smith denied that the company was not letting workers make up
>their own minds. "We hired intelligent and dedicated employees, and
>we trust them to make decisions about what's best for their
>future," she said. "But obviously we don't believe a union is best
>for their future or our customers."
>
> In large, bold letters, the Web site tells supervisors: "A union
>promotes and thrives upon problems between supervisors and
>employees. Front- line supervisors who deal effectively with
>associate problems avoid associates believing they need a union."
>
> Duane Stillwell, president of the Prewitt Organizing Fund, said:
>"It's unfortunate that this vaunted high- tech company is just
>saying the same crude things that factory owners have been saying
>for 100 years about unions. They're just scaring people out of
>wanting to do the right thing."
>
>
>
>The New York Times on the Web
>http://www.nytimes.com
Department of Sociology, University of Michigan
4022 LS&A Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI. 48109-1382.
Tel: 734-763-1270, Fax: 734-971-1993
Residential College, University of Michigan
106 Tyler, East Quad, Ann Arbor, MI. 48109-1245.
Tel: 734-647-4347, Fax: 734-971-1993
Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, University of Michigan
1111 E. Catherine St., Ann Arbor, MI. 48109-2054.
Tel: 734-647-6898, Fax:
734-971-1993
** Donate free food daily at: http://www.thehungersite.com/
--------- End Forwarded Message ---------
Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com
Reminder: HOLIDAY PELTIER GIFT DRIVE
http://www.egroups.com/message/MainLineNews/8225
[Peltier Walk For Freedom, December 10 NY City]
http://www.egroups.com/message/MainLineNews/7749
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/0/_/_/_/975970525/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
