4) Bush Says: "Let 'em Eat War" by wwnews 5) Dangerous Talk of Revolution by wwnews 6) Labor & the World Economic Forum by wwnews From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (wwnews) Date: torstai 31. tammikuu 2002 09:19 Subject: [WW] Bush Says: "Let 'em Eat War" ------------------------- Via Workers World News Service Reprinted from the Feb. 7, 2002 issue of Workers World newspaper ------------------------- PEOPLE WANT JOBS, SOCIAL SECURITY--BUSH SAYS: "LET 'EM EAT WAR" By Leslie Feinberg New York The bigwigs of big business plan to wine and dine on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange to celebrate the opening of the World Economic Forum. One familiar face at the annual capitalist think tank will be missing, but his presence will be felt like that of an 800-pound gorilla. Kenneth Lay, former Enron CEO and regular at Davos gatherings, has been politely, discreetly, but decidedly disinvited. Lay and his financial empire--now in ruin--were the unmentioned pink elephant in the ornate House of Representatives hall on Jan. 29, too. As George W. Bush, leader of the world's most dangerous regime, armed with the world's most dangerous weapons, strode to the dais amidst pomp and circumstance to deliver his bellicose State of the Union address, his former chief energy advisor was never mentioned and nowhere to be seen. How the mighty have fallen. Enron--the seventh-largest corporation in the world in its glory days--has become a dirty, five-letter word, from Washington to Wall Street. Corruption, greed, hubris, trickery, fraud--the list of charges Enron executives face in six Senate committees, two House committees, an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and a criminal inquiry by the Justice Department, is long. But greed and corruption alone do not cause economic recessions like the one widening and deepening around the world today. This crisis of abundance comes at the stage of history when goliath banks and mammoth corporations have fused into the monstrous entity of imperialist finance capital. They plunder the world's workers, pillage the most oppressed and ravage the planet with only one objective: profits. There is one law to which they must hew: expand or die. But the capitalist market is contracting. And the long shadow Enron casts may be the harbinger of a lengthy season of wintry recession. That makes the imperialist beast even more ravenous and more dangerous. RATTLING THE SABERS Bush's speech aimed to forge economic fear into war fervor. His speechwriters and advisors, who reportedly revised his address at least 18 times, were most certainly mindful of a recent poll by the New York Times and CBS News that showed people are more worried about the economy than "terrorism." (New York Times, Jan. 27) So as police ringed the Capitol Building, Bush rattled the sabers: "The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons." Even school children know that the U.S. has the biggest arsenal in the world. He characterized Iraq, Iran and the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea--north Korea--as the "axis of evil"--meant to equate three small, developing countries with Nazi Germany, imperial Japan and Italy during World War II. Bush's demonization of these developing countries, none of them nuclear powers, "may have little to do with Sept. 11. It has a lot more to do with the Pentagon's long term plans, and for a $50 billion increase in defense spending, the biggest leap in two decades," noted the British Guardian Unlimited Online the following day. At a time when his administration is trying to crush Palestinian aspirations for national liberation, Bush made Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad targets of his "anti- terror" battle. Perhaps most significant was his statement: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer." "Osama bin Laden was not mentioned once, al-Qaeda only in passing," observed Guardian Online. "The speech was clearly aimed at ushering in a new phase in the anti-terrorist campaign, in which links with the Sept. 11 attacks will no longer be the criteria for U.S. military action." But the countries in the crosshairs stood tall. "The world will not accept U.S. hegemony," Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi responded the next day. A statement from the Workers Party in north Korea called for withdrawal of the 37,000 U.S. troops in south Korea. It said "The U.S. seeks to unleash a new war with south Korea as a forward base and the U.S. forces in south Korea as the main force, swallow up the whole of Korea and, furthermore, put Asia under its military domination." Even the pro-U.S. government in the south rejected Bush's characterization of the north. In Baghdad, senior Iraqi parliamentarian Salim al-Qubaisi charged, "The American administration led by Bush has been threatening Iraq from time to time to prepare world public opinion for a new aggression against Iraq." Bush's 47-minute speech was interrupted more than 70 times by wild applause in the congressional chamber from the two parties of war. And much was made in the monopoly media about Bush's 80 percent approval rating in polls. But Bush Jr. would do well to recall how his father's popularity plummeted after the Gulf War as this country slid into a recession. In his State of the Union, Bush Jr. gave the economy shorter shrift. And there was less clapping from the Democrats. But they are both parties of big business. They are slinging mud, rather than stones, when it comes to the Enron debacle, for example, because they all live in glass palaces paid for by the banking and corporate empires. Bush's aggressive remarks were reminiscent of the 1952 declaration of Charles Wilson, President Dwight Eisenhower's defense secretary--and former president of General Motors-- that what was "good for General Motors" was "good for our country." Enron's deep ties to the Bush family give it an as- yet-unrevealed relationship to the CIA. The current Secretary of the Army, Thomas White Jr., was an Enron executive. When Bush Sr. was in the Oval Office he made the world "safe" for Enron and other predatory oil and gas transnationals. James A. Baker, an Enron consultant, helped the company win big contracts to help "rebuild" Kuwait after the Gulf War ended. (Newsweek, Jan. 28) Now Vice-President Richard Cheney has been forced to admit that he intervened with Indian officials last year on behalf of Enron regarding a troubled power project. Lay reportedly threatened Indian authorities with U.S. sanctions. (Financial Times, Jan. 25) The White House also concedes that Cheney met with Lay six times in 2001, the last just days before Enron's collapse. Bush and Cheney refuse to divulge details about discussions with Enron executives. Cheney sat directly behind Bush during the speech. Former Enron executive Sherron Smith Watkins is being hailed as a courageous whistle blower. But she sent management a warning so high-pitched that only the top dogs could hear it. Her letter warned Lay that another executive, J. Clifford Baxter, was complaining mightily to all who would listen about the company's crooked accounting schemes. After being subpoenaed by the Senate Governmental Affairs Subcommittee, Baxter was found shot to death in his car. His death was quickly ruled a suicide. But it turns out he hired a bodyguard one day before he was found dead. Baxter's shooting is as convenient in its timing for Enron execs as Princess Di's demise was for the House of Windsor. A lawyer involved in the broadening Enron financial scandal told Newsweek, "All the facts that you know now are just the tip of the iceberg." (Jan. 28) Now, Bush Jr. is making Central Asia "safe" for campaign- contributor Unocal to build a lucrative gas pipeline. Who among the World Economic Forum coterie will cast the first stone at Enron? Coca-Cola executives, who reportedly hired death squads to terrorize their Colombian workers? BP Amoco, that is despoiling the planet? Merck, one of the giant pharmaceuticals that sued the South African government to bar it from obtaining generic AIDS drugs? Boeing, Microsoft and IBM, three of the Fortune 500 that use prison labor? Deutsche Bank, Siemens and Volkswagen, that wrung super-profits from slave labor during the Nazi era? Even now, on the eve of WEF opening, police are stationed in front of Old Navy, Starbucks and other hated symbols of U.S. finance capital here. As crowds of capitalists arrive, the cops are practicing crowd control against the have-nots. Bush, in his state of the union, called on working people to donate 4,000 hours of community service to their country. It's the movement against capitalism, against globalization's iron grip, that needs those volunteer hours. There are banners to paint, press releases to write, battles to strategize. Be all that you can be, in the army of the liberation. - END - (Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org) From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (wwnews) Date: torstai 31. tammikuu 2002 09:19 Subject: [WW] Dangerous Talk of Revolution ------------------------- Via Workers World News Service Reprinted from the Feb. 7, 2002 issue of Workers World newspaper ------------------------- STATEMENT OF WORKERS WORLD PARTY: DANGEROUS TALK OF REVOLUTION These are the best of times and the worst of times. The awful truth about capitalism can no longer be hidden. Even the moneyed oligarchs who have gathered in New York to celebrate their world system are haunted by the specter of Enron and the inner turmoil its collapse reveals within the incestuous web of U.S. industry, finance and government. An economic crisis is unrolling that started in the financial markets, is spreading to the factories, offices and stores, and can engulf the political structures of capitalist governments everywhere, as it is doing so spectacularly at this very moment Argentina. This crisis is driving the Bush administration's adventurous military expansion, which has two aspects: an attempt to resuscitate the flagging fortunes of U.S. capital with a strong jolt of war spending and imperial conquest; and a media-coordinated scare-mongering campaign to divert workers' attention from the scandalous and criminal theft of so much wealth by the cabal intertwined with the Washington elite. As the World Economic Forum meets, outside will be a glimpse of the new movement--global, like the system whose crimes it is protesting--that is a forerunner of things to come. Each protester speaks for a multitude around the world who "stand outcast and starving midst the wonders we have made," in the words of the old union song. This movement is young and hopeful, despite all the doomsday scenarios confronting it. Yes, it is saying, you are damaging our beloved planet, starving and stunting the world's people, bringing them exploitation and war instead of clean water and plowshares, but we believe another world is possible. Those determined to rule this world reply, "Be careful what you say. Such talk is dangerous. Don't force us to lock you up or even shoot you down, as in Genoa." Yes, the truth is dangerous. And hopeful truth is the most dangerous kind. It can infect the millions whose jobs hang by a thread, who are mired in debt to billionaire banks, who suffer the daily indignities and injustices of a racist, sexist, anti-gay system, and who see no way out. There is a way out. Every day workers of all nationalities show their skill, ingenuity and reliability in making the global network of modern production function almost seamlessly. They are the social class that can rescue humanity from the grave the capitalists are digging for us all--and they are everywhere, as numerous as the leaves on the trees. But today the workers are organized by the capitalist class, and their existence is tolerated only as a category necessary to the pursuit of profit. When profit cannot be obtained from their labor, they are cast out. The suffering in the wake of Enron's collapse shows why all workers desperately need to organize independently, to protect their own class interests against the predatory bosses. Who else will represent them? Every branch of the state is compromised by its intimate relation with the banking/corporate Robber Barons. If all those now fearing pink slips were to assert their right to their jobs, were to band together and refuse to be sent away, were to demand recognition of the sweat equity that makes them the true owners of this economy, then we would be on the path leading to that better world. Today, we are on a different path--Bush's path--the path of neocolonial war, death, destruction and counter-revolution abroad, while fleecing and repressing the workers at home. What can be done about it? Workers World Party has no confidence in any of the political structures of U.S. imperialist society. They function to serve the interests of the capitalist ruling class. Their pretense of following a democratic mandate is a sham. Bought-and-paid-for elections politically disenfranchise the workers. The crude manipulations revealed in 2000 confirmed this country's long racist tradition of trampling on Black voters. The result is a government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich, that yields only to mass struggle. WWP has the greatest confidence in the revolutionary potential of the multinational working class of this country to break out of this trap and create their own organs of struggle and, eventually, of power. The power to lead society out of the abyss--that is what the struggle is all about. A revolutionary Marxist party is always on the lookout for ways that the workers can realize and express this power. An organization that takes seriously the great responsibility and dangers thrust on the working class must be accountable for its own actions. It cannot be a debating society--there are plenty of those already. It must be a party of action and combat, able to advance or retreat as a unit, inspired by a common program. It must be flexible enough to consider varying viewpoints when deciding on analysis and a course of action. It must be united in carrying out the struggle and in explaining and defending its program to the workers. The workers must know that they can trust the party to do what it says, and not go in a hundred different directions when action is called for. This takes a unique blend of democracy and centralism. This communist form of organization brings forward the revolutionary leadership potential of the most oppressed in this society--especially those held down by racism, sexism and genderism--while it enables the greatest solidarity in practice among all who want to defeat this rotten system. It is the antithesis of the way a capitalist political organization functions--where money dictates policy and public debates are only window dressing. Dangerous words. And meant to be. - END - (Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org) From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (wwnews) Date: torstai 31. tammikuu 2002 09:19 Subject: [WW] Labor & the World Economic Forum ------------------------- Via Workers World News Service Reprinted from the Feb. 7, 2002 issue of Workers World newspaper ------------------------- LABOR AND THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM By Milt Neidenberg What was needed was a loud and clear voice that could be heard around the country and the globe demanding global economic justice. It wasn't to be. They let out a squeak when it should have been a bellow. On Jan. 17, less than two weeks before the meeting of the World Economic Forum, AFL-CIO leaders finally joined the growing protest against this wealthy group of corporate and banking moguls allied with government elites. This group of billionaires will spend Jan. 31 to Feb. 4 defending their grossly disproportionate share of the world's precious resources. The WEF will be held in New York to show the world that, following the World Trade Center attack, the city is now a secure setting for this glorified, ostentatious function. The mobilization of police and other law enforcement personnel who have been training for weeks, the media blitz of violence baiting that has saturated the public, is all unprecedented and calculated to intimidate participants from joining the protest. It seems to be working in regard to the AFL-CIO leaders. In a letter and leaflet addressed only to local unions in New York City and the state federation, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney outlined two modest activities scheduled for Jan. 29 to provide laborresponse to the World Economic Forum. One activity will be a forum to hear "what globalization is doing to our families, our communities, our countries, our future." Sweeney will be the featured speaker. AFL-CIO CALLS OFF MARCH The other activity would have been a "March for Global Justice." However, the march was called off. Instead, the AFL-CIO will hold a rally at a Gap storefront near the Waldorf-Astoria, where the WEF is meeting. Unfortunately, this was the union leadership response when city and higher- up law enforcement officials denied them their constitutional right to march. Their literature states, "Say 'no' to sweatshops, layoffs and the global corporate agenda, and say 'yes' to the worldwide movement for global justice." This is a step forward from previous years when they responded to the global corporate agenda with an appeal for "fair trade, not free trade." As if these greedy, marauding scoundrels who scour the globe to enrich their treasuries at the expense of the most oppressed have any sense of fairness. Behind the façade of glitter and gold, a sense of gloom and doom appears to be pervading the WEF participants. Robert Hormat--vice chair of Goldman, Sachs International and a spokesperson on many occasions for Wall Street's sentiments-- expressed his view that there is no longer a feeling of invulnerability. "A new sense of realism has descended on us, and we realize we're all in peril." (New York Times, Jan. 27) This should be a wakeup call for these labor leaders. The mood of the class enemy is significant in planning action struggles. One such struggle that is sure to come up at the WEF is the Free Trade Area Agreement. FTAA--a threat to the millions of workers here and abroad--is a top priority for the Bush administration and corporate/banking tycoons. AFL-CIO President Sweeney has been invited to address a session of the WEF. Will he denounce this multilateral bosses' agreement--which is nothing more than another North America Free Trade Agreement? NAFTA, which opened up Canada and Mexico to U.S. capitalists, decimated the jobs and working conditions of workers here and abroad. The FTAA is much more threatening. It will encompass all of South America and the Caribbean. It remains to be seen what the text of his remarks will be. But one fact is certain. There is a growing opposition and a deep distrust abroad, particularly in Latin America, for the FTAA, which seeks to open up those markets for further U.S. exploitation. SWEENEY SHOULD SHOW SOLIDARITY ON FTAA President Sweeney should acknowledge this growing militancy in a show of international solidarity and spell it out. In Argentina, the labor movement and the poor continue to take to the streets in general strikes and other mass actions. In a show of defiance, they are demanding that the new government break the financial and political grip U.S. banks and corporations still hold on their country. In Brazil, unemployment is on the rise. Organizations like the Landless Workers Movement--who work on the sugar plantations--are opposing the stranglehold U.S. tariffs and quotas have on their economy. In Mexico, steelworkers have occupied a number of plants beholden to U.S. NAFTA agreements, along with other struggles. Venezuela, Colombia and much of Latin America are seething with anti-U.S. rage as unemployment, poverty and hunger rise. President George W. Bush's "free trade" policy, the FTAA, and all the exorbitant benefits accrued to U.S. banks/corporations, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank are in jeopardy. Meanwhile, socialist Cuba stands as an alternative, a beacon of hope for the downtrodden masses of workers and peasants. This is all good news for the labor movement here and it should make the most of it. This militancy can only help the AFL-CIO and the millions of members who are under assault from the Bush administration and Wall Street. The Bush administration is already charging these worldwide movements with "terrorism" to justify its plans for military aggression, as it is doing in Colombia. According to an extensive article on the WEF in the Jan. 27 New York Times, "terror ism is now synonymous with opposition to globalization." Financial writers Ste pha nie Strom and Louis Uchitelle claimed: "Not only has globalization been cast by terrorists as the cause of many ills, but it also may be the culprit behind the synchronized slowdown of the world economy, the first global downturn since the oil crisis of the 1970s." This phony propaganda won't fly. The workers know well enough who are responsible for the global recession: the billionaires who will be attending the WEF. WORKERS MORE CONCERNED WITH ECONOMY THAN 'TERRORISM' In a recent New York Times/CBS poll, a cross-section of the population has shifted its opinion in recent weeks. According to the poll, "the economy has now supplanted battling terrorism." This is a significant development. Since the attack on the World Trade Center, the government's campaign to inject "terrorism" and patriotism into every facet of life has enabled the Bush administration to successfully carry out U.S. imperialism's war drive and the war against labor, the poor and the oppressed. Are those days numbered? Will the AFL-CIO leaders deal with this dramatic development? In his opening remarks to an AFL-CIO Biennial Convention held in Las Vegas in late November, which most commentators and analysts called uneventful and uninspiring, Sweeney urged union leaders to "take the offensive in a war here at home." He was referring to an offensive against President Bush, congressional Republicans and corporations. While he repeated again and again this theme of waging war here at home to the 1,000 delegates, he added, "even as we support the president and our troops in the conflict abroad." Sweeney praised Bush for "waging the war against terrorism." This sends the wrong message at a time when the deepening recession is awakening the workers to struggle. The AFL-CIO leaders are in a dangerous contradiction. Unless they detach themselves from the frenzy of the campaign on "terrorism" that justifies expanding the war abroad, the labor movement can't wage an effective fightback against all the social ills impacting on the workforce here. Events such as the Enron debacle, which exposes every feature of capitalist accumulation of wealth and the system that deepens the gap between rich and poor, have awakened anger among the workers--especially people of color--who will bear the brunt of the recession. Is the class-consciousness of multinational rank-and-file workers on the rise? Is a people's movement--made up of students and youth, immigrant and community organizations-- taking their grievances into the streets? Just maybe, these developments have overshadowed the views of AFL-CIO leaders and turned the wheel leftward toward new and creative forms of struggle. It's time for these labor leaders to get aboard and check it out. - END - (Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)