KR> C.G. location / flying qualities

2010-04-08 Thread Ross Evans
com > To: kr...@mylist.net > Subject: Re: KR> C.G. location / flying qualities > Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:14:34 +1000 > > NO only with the KR's, as most will tell you, with a header tank as > standard, the C of G moves to far aft when all the plans COG is used and it > is v

KR> C.G. location / flying qualities

2010-04-05 Thread Jim Sellars
: www.WealthManagementCanada.com -Original Message- From: phillip matheson [mailto:phillipmathe...@bigpond.com] Sent: April 5, 2010 4:15 AM To: KRnet Subject: Re: KR> C.G. location / flying qualities NO only with the KR's, as most will tell you, with a header tank as standard, the C of G moves to

KR> C.G. location / flying qualities

2010-04-05 Thread phillip matheson
NO only with the KR's, as most will tell you, with a header tank as standard, the C of G moves to far aft when all the plans COG is used and it is very dangerous. Phil Matheson SAAA Ch 20 www.phils...@50megs.com

KR> C.G. location / flying qualities

2010-03-31 Thread Tim
For many design's that doesn't leave much travel & an Enforcement headache. ie: Fuselage tank"Sir, how much gas did you take-off with" CldLk-Tim - Original Message - From: "phillip matheson" In Australia, CASA ( Air Safety Dept) do NOT allow the

KR> C.G. location / flying qualities

2010-03-30 Thread Tony King
Is that just with KR's or in general? Tony King Brisbane Australia On 31 March 2010 15:44, phillip matheson wrote: > In Australia, CASA ( Air Safety Dept) do NOT allow the use of the rear 2 > inches of the C of G for safety concerns. > > Phil Matheson > SAAA Ch 20 >

KR> C.G. location / flying qualities

2010-03-30 Thread phillip matheson
In Australia, CASA ( Air Safety Dept) do NOT allow the use of the rear 2 inches of the C of G for safety concerns. Phil Matheson SAAA Ch 20 www.phils...@50megs.com

KR> C.G. location / flying qualities

2010-03-30 Thread Larry Flesner
At 07:33 AM 3/30/2010, you wrote: >What effect if any does the engine have on flying a KR-2 with 2 people? You >would think that a larger engine like an 0-200 would bring the CG forward more >as opposed to an Volkswagon 1853. >How does the wing design effect the flying characteristics with 2