KR> LSA KR-Thanks!

Thanks to all who provided me some insite into the KR LSA questions that I had. I believe my best choice and best bet for getting into the air under the LSA rules would be to go with a plane like the Sonex or the 601XL. I do still like the KRs though (also the corvair power plant) and it might

KR> LSA KR-Thanks!

Kenny: The Zenith 601 HD is a good choice. I have visited & toured their facility in Mexico MO as it is only about 120 miles from where I live. Additionally it is possible to upgrade it to a higer speed version by just building HDS outer wing panels that will up the max speed to 150 mph.

KR> LSA KR-Thanks!

I have a friend who is close to completing a 601. Personally, I don't like it. That center, flip over stick, looks like it could really be a problem. The plane is big and looks bulky. It costs as much as an RV. All the parts did not fit well. This guy has completed 4 RVs and this was a

Réf. : KR> LSA KR-Thanks!

et> Envoyé par : krnet-bounces+serge.vidal=sagem@mylist.net 05/05/2006 15:06 Veuillez répondre à KRnet Remis le : 05/05/2006 15:07 Pour : KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> cc :(ccc : Serge VIDAL/DNSA/SAGEM) Objet : KR> LSA KR-Thanks! I have a friend who is clo

KR> LSA KR

Hello all, Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a search of the archives but there didn't seem to be a lot there as far as LSA and KRs go. I am also considering the Sonex. I just want to be sure

KR> LSA KR

...@att.net List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: 2006/05/02 Tue AM 06:30:52 CDT To: kr...@mylist.net Subject: KR> LSA KR Hello all, Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a search of the archi

KR> LSA KR

At 07:01 AM 5/2/2006, you wrote: >I made a search of the archives but there didn't seem to be a lot >there as far as LSA and KRs go. >Kenny >+++ I went to the following site, which is listed at the bottom of every e-mail,

KR> LSA KR

HERE WE GO AGAIN, Virg On Tue, 02 May 2006 11:30:52 + af...@att.net writes: > Hello all, > > Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 > that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a > search of the archives but there didn't seem to be

KR> LSA KR

Kenny:: I have taken over a KR2 project and am kind of "Rolling the Dice" on this one. The craft must meet of couse meet all of the requirements of the "Sport Plane" catagory. The most difficult to achieve of these to meet is the construction of the craft so that its top speed "clean" in

KR> LSA KR

Hi Don, Where did you getthe AirCalc program and how much did it cost? i would like to try it, I don't think its a big deal to redesign the KR to be an LSA and call it something else. sincerely Jim On Tue, 02 May 2006 09:54:42 -0500 D F Lively writes: > Kenny:: > > I have

KR> LSA KR

At 07:30 AM 5/2/06, you wrote: >Hello all, > >Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 >that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a >search of the archives but there didn't seem to be a lot there as >far as LSA and KRs go. After today's spate

KR> LSA KR

Sorry, didn't mean that last post to go to the list :-( Regards, RonB

KR> LSA KR

Thanks , I was loking for that. Jim On Tue, 02 May 2006 12:15:21 -0400 Ron Butterfield writes: > Sorry, didn't mean that last post to go to the list :-( > > > Regards, > RonB > > > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at >

KR> LSA KR

Kenny: I downloaded it from the net for the best price of all--- Free! Just type in "AirCalc" into your search engine and I thik you will find it. I stumbled on it it while looking for ways to to lower the stall speed of wings using L.E. slots/slats. I think I have the back up for it as well.

KR> LSA KR

How about the KR-1b, Virg On Tue, 02 May 2006 12:14:29 -0400 Ron Butterfield writes: > At 07:30 AM 5/2/06, you wrote: > >Hello all, > > > >Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 > > >that would meet the qualifications for LSA

KR> LSA KR

At 03:56 PM 5/2/06, VIRGIL N SALISBURY wrote: > How about the KR-1b, Virg Ran the numbers, 45hp stock 1600, 800lb, 91sf, Airfoil is funny; center is RAF48 (CL 1.42), outer wings start as GAW(2) (CL 2.04) tapering to GAW(1) at tip (CL 1.8). Rough average CL of 1.76 Stall 44Top

KR> LSA KR

Ron: I do not think spoilers results count because LSA stipulates stipulates "CLEAN" which means that the deployment of lift destroying devices or any device that alters the wing geometry is unacceptable to meet the requirement. That is why I looked at L.E. Slots/Slats but could not find

KR> LSA KR

AM To: KRnet Subject: Re: KR> LSA KR Ron: I do not think spoilers results count because LSA stipulates stipulates "CLEAN" which means that the deployment of lift destroying devices or any device that alters the wing geometry is unacceptable to meet the requirement. That is why I

KR> LSA KR

Kruyssen > Cairns, Australia > k...@bigpond.com > http://www.users.bigpond.com/kr2/kr2.htm > > -Original Message- > From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf > Of D F Lively > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 8:48 AM > To: KRnet > Subje