KR> Thrust offset

Hi all I am about to start work on my engine mount ( diehl case 2275 vw ) will I need to factor in a thrust offset or not ? Also what length mount are you using ? The plans say 6 1/2 inches but I am thinking with a diehl case and starter it will need to be longer. All thoughts appreciated

KR> Thrust offset

At 04:07 PM 12/7/2015, you wrote: >Hi all I am about to start work on my engine mount ( diehl case 2275 >vw ) will I need to factor in a thrust offset or not ? Also what >length mount are you using

KR> Thrust line

If you go to my webpage you can see pictures of the fixture I just built for my O-235. They are listed under the 3/11/15 update. Craig http://www.kr2seafury.com/ > On September 23, 2015 at 5:58 PM Mike Arnold via KRnet list.krnet.org> > wrote: > > > So, no one wants to wade in on the thrust

KR> Thrust line

Thanks Larry and those that responded. The plane is already built but no engine or mount. It was originally built with a 0-200. I am putting a VW 1835 on it. Insert sad emote here. I am going to build an adjustable jig. You thought I was going to say "engine mount" didn't you. Ha ha ha, . .

KR> Thrust line

At 04:58 PM 9/23/2015, you wrote: >So, no one wants to wade in on the thrust line on the fire wall for a KR2 >huh. No Aeronautical engineers out there. ++ I'm sure there are. I'm not an engineer but my opinion is very affordable. The plans

KR> Thrust line

If I recall correctly (from about 1989) I tried to get the engine thrust line at center of crankshaft to line up with the top longeron. I did not offset the engine laterally to compensate for p factor like I have read that some planes do. Too much math for me. -- next part

KR> Thrust line

So, no one wants to wade in on the thrust line on the fire wall for a KR2 huh. No Aeronautical engineers out there.

KR> Thrust line

I'm not an engineer but I've been in the presence of a few. I was told the thrust line is typically in plane with the top longeron. I set mine at 2.5"s below to accommodate the Corvair and the starter. Check out the KRnet Archives. Type "thrust line " in the email body section and watch the

KR> Thrust line

How do you locate the thrust line on the fire wall. Makeing my own motor mount.

KR> thrust

When I run up my 2108 VW on level pavement, the nose will dip down and the attitude gyro shows the number of degrees. Shut down I hung weights on the crank shaft to get the same nose down pitch. Using similar math as for the weight & balance measurements, I calculated the thrust to be 203

KR> "THRUST!"

Hi Guys; I have worked on engines of about all kinds in my lifetime and many different kinds of vehicles and machinery. I have driven, boated and flown many of them as have many of you but the only thing that I can think of that still amazes me is that every time I'm on an airliner and we pull

KR> thrust line

can anyone informed tell me what the thrust line is supposed to be on a standard kr 2 where is it measured from tia phill

KR> thrust line

At 05:21 PM 5/22/2007, you wrote: >can anyone informed tell me what the thrust line is supposed to be >on a standard kr 2 >where is it measured from >tia > >phill + Without looking back at the plans I believe it should fall in the

KR> thrust line

Phil. The Top of the longerons ???is the normal thrust line. I do remember a number of builder changing , including me. I lowering my thrust line about 1 1/2 inches below the longerons to allow the twin top mounted carbs to fit under the cowl line. But One of the Famous Mark's Brothers, sorry

KR> thrust line

phil brookman wrote: > can anyone informed tell me what the thrust line is supposed to be on a standard kr 2 > where is it measured from Below is a post from 2005 that I found in the archives (http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp) that pretty much sums it up. I had always thought it was in

KR> thrust line

Phil. > The Top of the longerons ???is the normal thrust line. > > But One of the Famous Mark's Brothers, sorry (Mark L and Mark J ) would be > a > much better adviser than I. > Famous, ha...maybe crazy..mine is set 1 1/2 inches below the longeron. Mark Jones (N886MJ) Wales, WI Visit my

KR> Thrust Line issues

Don and netters Something else came to mind the other day when considering the effects of raised or lowered thrust line. During flight training to become CFI's we were always told that the reason the Piper Seminole was made with a high "T" tail as compared to its sister plane the Piper Seneca

KR> Thrust Line issues

@mylist.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 12:07 AM Subject: KR> Thrust Line issues > Don and netters > Something else came to mind the other day when considering the effects of > raised or lowered thrust line. During flight training to become CFI's we > were always told that the

KR> Thrust Line issues

Funny, my instructor called them the "Trauma - hawk" because of the T tail being less responsive to prop wash when you need it the most - stall recovery. Raising the trust-line I would think increases the loads on the upper half of the firewall. Maybe not enough to worry about, but I sure like

KR> Thrust Line issues

kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:46 AM Subject: Re: KR> Thrust Line issues > Funny, my instructor called them the "Trauma - hawk" because of the T > tail being less responsive to prop wash when you need it the most - > stall recovery. > > Rai

KR> Thrust Line issues

I learned to fly in a Tomahawk. Didn't realize landings were easy till I began flying a 172 !!! Pete Klapp, KR-2S, Canton, OH From: "Dave Arbogast, CISSP" <k...@arb.net> Reply-To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> Subject: Re: KR> Thru

KR> Thrust Line issues

ned to fly in a Tomahawk. Didn't realize landings were easy till I >began flying a 172 !!! > >Pete Klapp, KR-2S, Canton, OH > > >From: "Dave Arbogast, CISSP" <k...@arb.net> >Reply-To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> >To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> >Subj

KR> Thrust Line issues

Rumor has it that it was called a "Trauma-hawk" because it was "spin friendly". :-) -Original Message- From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf Of Dave Arbogast, CISSP Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:46 AM To: KRnet Subject:

KR> Thrust

Steve, Those things had (have) so much thrust they didn't even need wings. Like the F-104 proves. Of course, the wings do make it easier to land... Frank Steve Bray wrote: Hello Hennie So if you are correct Mark J and Mark L's airplanes will slow down when painted ?

KR> Thrust

Frank So thrust is a good thing,, right ? Steve >From: Frank Ross <alamo...@yahoo.com> >Reply-To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> >To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> >Subject: KR> Thrust >Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 02:09:59 -0700 (PDT) > >Steve, > Those things ha

KR> Thrust

Steve Bray wrote: Frank So thrust is a good thing,, right ? Steve Steve, Thrust, lift, whatever keeps you up... Frank Frank Ross, EAA Chapter 35, San Geronimo, TX RAF Lakenheath, Suffolk, England, UK Visit my photo album at: http://photos.yahoo.com/alamokr2

KR> Thrust Line

I have been looking for info on the correct thrust line, Others have talked about the T/L being equal to the top longerons, If I fit my engines cowls and sort out he centre of the prop outlet, the T/L seems to be approx 1 - 3/4 inches below the T/L. Can anyone add to this. Phil Matheson

KR> Thrust Line

Phil Matheson wrote: > I have been looking for info on the correct thrust line, Others have talked > about the > T/L being equal to the top longerons, If I fit my engines cowls and sort out > he centre of the prop outlet, the T/L seems to be approx 1 - 3/4 inches > below the T/L. > Can anyone add

KR> Thrust Line

, September 01, 2004 6:57 AM To: KRnet Subject: Re: KR> Thrust Line Phil Matheson wrote: > I have been looking for info on the correct thrust line, Others have talked > about the > T/L being equal to the top longerons, If I fit my engines cowls and sort out > he centre of the prop

KR> Thrust line data

Mark..sent the headsets Monday..They were 45 each..the venturi were 25 each..bob Mark Langford wrote: > > Steve McGee wrote: > > >> I know I have seen this mentioned before both here and noticed it in > >> web > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to

KR> Thrust line data

I know I have seen this mentioned before both here and noticed it in web sites, but have not noticed it in the manual or on the drawings. I take it I am missing something here as everyone that has built their plane had to figure this out. Langford mentions being high or low from the main

KR> Thrust line data

Steve McGee wrote: >> I know I have seen this mentioned before both here and noticed it in web sites, but have not noticed it in the manual or on the drawings. I take it I am missing something here as everyone that has built their plane had to figure this out. Langford mentions being high

KR> Thrust line data

I guess I should have answered your question, which is that it's generally considered to be in the same plane as the top of the top longeron. That's been arrived at by the fact that if you buy an RR or Revmaster cowling, that's where the center of the prop hole ends up, blah, blah, blah... Mark