If you want to get an article published, you are going to need to sell the
author on the article, and in turn he will need to sell the publisher on the
idea that the article will help sell the magazine. Before writing an article,
one might want to see if you can convince Dave that it has merit
On 03/27/2015 09:42 AM, Mark Jones via KRnet wrote:
> If someone knows Dave
> Prizio at Kitplanes and how to get in touch with him maybe they would like
> to do a follow up article and call it "Today's REAL WORLD KR".
Contact editorial at kitplanes.com and they should be able to work out the
I think we just did .Tommy W.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Mark Jones via KRnet
wrote:
> I just read the article. Overall I thought it was decent with a few
> exceptions. Everyone has their own opinions and we don't need to get into a
> pi$$ing match about this. Earl brings up a valid
Hi all,
I am normally a quiet sideline type person as I have not built the KR
yet but am trying to get more planning done. I am wondering if it would
be possible to give Dave Prizio the praises he deserves by attending the
gathering and writing the article but also have the experts like Larry
I just read the article. Overall I thought it was decent with a few
exceptions. Everyone has their own opinions and we don't need to get into a
pi$$ing match about this. Earl brings up a valid point about doing a follow
up article as well as Larry's statements about the true specs of today's
KRs.
At 11:21 PM 3/26/2015, you wrote:
>Very few KRs "cruise" at 180 mph. Very few KRs make a 980# gross
>weight. Very few KRs are 520# empty weight. Over the last 20
>years, the members of this forum have made great strides in
>improving the handling characteristics and safety of the
>plane.
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:01 PM
> From: "Chris Prata via KRnet"
>
> I actually read the Kitplanes article and would like to ask what the glaring
> errors, omissions, misstatements are, I am asking for educational reasons. I
> do know the "specs" chart is hopelessly outdated and
Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 5:18 PM
> From: "Flesner via KRnet"
> To: KRnet
> Subject: Re: KR> how many KRs at Chino?
>
> At 09:00 AM 3/26/2015, you wrote:
> >Guys, go back and re-read the article. The number "4
rom: KRnet [mailto:krnet-bounces at list.krnet.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Scott
via KRnet
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:21 PM
To: chrisprata at live.com; krnet at list.krnet.org
Subject: Re: KR> how many KRs at Chino?
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:01 PM
> From: "Chris Prata vi
Guys, go back and re-read the article. The number "40 or so" was in reference
to the number of attendees, not the number of planes. Number of attendees was
something well north of 40, but most of the time I saw 30 - 40 folks hanging
around. Dave Prizio was there and talked to a number of
I think there was 10 KR's??there.?
Paul Visk
Belleville I'll
618 406 4705
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S?4
Original message
From: Mark Langford via KRnet
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date:03/26/2015 7:38 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: KRnet
Subject: KR> how many KRs at Ch
11 matches
Mail list logo
