On Monday 16 November 2009 20:11:45 Alan Grimes wrote:
Matthew Ayres wrote:
I like the suggestion of SVG graphics, especially as the SVG standard
has official room for customisation which may be useful. I would be
happy to build up a library of graphics, if that meets with approval.
I
On Monday 16 November 2009 02:15:29 Alan Grimes wrote:
My issue is that I really can't get a handle on the KDE4 porting
process. On the other hand, I'm fairly comfortable with the OpenGL model
so I have a much clearer picture of how it would work... Remember, that
negative coordinants are
I like the suggestion of SVG graphics, especially as the SVG standard
has official room for customisation which may be useful. I would be
happy to build up a library of graphics, if that meets with approval.
I read the wikipedia entry on that. Okay, so it's an XML format... I
have not been
Would you propose a migration from the mailing list to the Yahoo
group? Or would the Yahoo group start as more of a user-space?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:44 PM, David Briscoe
da...@djsbriscoe.vispa.com wrote:
Hi,
The point of the group would be to make Ktechlab more visible and
possibly
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 10:04:25 Matthew Ayres wrote:
It looks as though Julian is already working on the SVGs so I guess
I'd risk duplicating work?
Nope. I just created some examples for testing purposes to start with the
logic behind these SVGs and visualise them in a QGraphicsScene.
It looks as though Julian is already working on the SVGs so I guess
I'd risk duplicating work?
Nope. I just created some examples for testing purposes to start with the
logic behind these SVGs and visualise them in a QGraphicsScene.
Okay, so shall I do both graphics and code customisation?
moin,
I just tried to edit a page in the wiki and I get the following error:
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups:
editor, admin.
Can someone of you, Alan or Zaltan, please add me to the
moin,
I want to separate this discussion from the original thread. Here is, what I
have in mind, when thinking about how the visualisation of components should
work:
First there is a circuit. It is represented in a CircuitDocument, which can be
saved and loaded from disk (in form of some
Done, I guess. If still doesn't work, I'll search for other settings...
2009/11/17 Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de
moin,
I just tried to edit a page in the wiki and I get the following error:
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
The action you have
Sounds good.
Just a note about the voltage/current visualization: considering the fact
that the rectangles displaying the voltages will be redrawn many times per
second, we should consider there the drawing performance. Maybe a simple
class showing only that rectangle could be useful.
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 13:47:27 Zoltan Padrah wrote:
Done, I guess. If still doesn't work, I'll search for other settings...
confirmed. thanks :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
The topic in the subject should be also discussed. I've never worked yet
with either one, but SVN has some shortcomings -- for example is hard to
track code changes.
Compatibility with KDE could be a bonus.
Julian worked with git on kde4 port.
Note, comments, opinions?
I'm just dropping in my vote for git, mainly because I know fractionally
more about it than I do about mercurial. I've mainly used CVS before, but
I'm not one to advocate it particularly.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.comwrote:
The topic in the subject
13 matches
Mail list logo
