Re: Plasma 5 on Kubuntu 14.10

2014-07-07 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:35:05AM +0300, Ovidiu-Florin Bogdan wrote:
I think having a separate iso would be better.

Making the packages to replace Plasma and KSC 4 would be far more
complicated than having a separate Testing iso.
From what I remember, Martin said Plasma 5 cannot run besides Plasma. So
we would need something like the neon project.

But considering the existence of the neon project, would this be worth the
effort?

 Sure it's worth the effort, we'll be switching to Plasma 5 as default
 in a future release and we want to be ready at the time.

 We plan for a separate ISO which will be called Kubuntu Plasma 5 Remix
 or Kubuntu Plasma 5 Tech Preview or similar.  If it's practical to do
 with a PPA then we'll get it built using a PPA as well which means
 less issues renaming packages to make them co-exist in the archive.

 Jonathan

Having a standard and testing ISO will be cool. We just need really
good, clear docs to ensure wide-spread testing.

I'm sure the Neon experience will help the team develop what we need
for the ISOs. This is really exciting.

Valorie
-- 
http://about.me/valoriez

-- 
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel


Re: Plasma 5 on Kubuntu 14.10

2014-06-27 Thread Ovidiu-Florin Bogdan
I think having a separate iso would be better.

Making the packages to replace Plasma and KSC 4 would be far more
complicated than having a separate Testing iso.
From what I remember, Martin said Plasma 5 cannot run besides Plasma. So we
would need something like the neon project.

But considering the existence of the neon project, would this be worth the
effort?
-- 
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel


Re: Plasma 5 on Kubuntu 14.10

2014-06-27 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:35:05AM +0300, Ovidiu-Florin Bogdan wrote:
I think having a separate iso would be better.
 
Making the packages to replace Plasma and KSC 4 would be far more
complicated than having a separate Testing iso.
From what I remember, Martin said Plasma 5 cannot run besides Plasma. So
we would need something like the neon project.
 
But considering the existence of the neon project, would this be worth the
effort?

Sure it's worth the effort, we'll be switching to Plasma 5 as default
in a future release and we want to be ready at the time.

We plan for a separate ISO which will be called Kubuntu Plasma 5 Remix
or Kubuntu Plasma 5 Tech Preview or similar.  If it's practical to do
with a PPA then we'll get it built using a PPA as well which means
less issues renaming packages to make them co-exist in the archive.

Jonathan



-- 
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel


Re: Plasma 5 on Kubuntu 14.10

2014-06-27 Thread Nowardev-Team
2 iso it's the best solution , and i guess it's what users would like.

2014-06-27 12:11 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org:
 On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:35:05AM +0300, Ovidiu-Florin Bogdan wrote:
I think having a separate iso would be better.

Making the packages to replace Plasma and KSC 4 would be far more
complicated than having a separate Testing iso.
From what I remember, Martin said Plasma 5 cannot run besides Plasma. So
we would need something like the neon project.

But considering the existence of the neon project, would this be worth the
effort?

 Sure it's worth the effort, we'll be switching to Plasma 5 as default
 in a future release and we want to be ready at the time.

 We plan for a separate ISO which will be called Kubuntu Plasma 5 Remix
 or Kubuntu Plasma 5 Tech Preview or similar.  If it's practical to do
 with a PPA then we'll get it built using a PPA as well which means
 less issues renaming packages to make them co-exist in the archive.

 Jonathan



 --
 kubuntu-devel mailing list
 kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel

-- 
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel


Plasma 5 on Kubuntu 14.10

2014-06-26 Thread Rohan Garg
## Description

Plasma 5 is an evolutionary release of the popular plasma desktop
workspace.  Plasma 5 runs on top of a fully hardware-accelerated
graphics stack,
using Qt 5, QML 2 and an OpenGL(-ES) scenegraph to deliver graphics
onto the users' screens. This allows the rendering to be faster, more
efficient, less power-hungry and enables a smoother user experience by
 freeing up resources of the system processor. Plasma 5 completes
the migration of the workspace to Qt Quick that has begun in earlier  releases.

Kubuntu would like to ship an ISO that provides the Plasma 5
experience while also shipping the regular KDE Software Collection
with Plasma 1 ISO,
so that users may be able to choose between a tested stable system and
a newer system still in heavy development.

## The plan

KDE Frameworks 5 (the libraries which Plasma 5 is based on ) will have
a monthly release cadence, in order to iron out bugs faster while also
providing
new features to application developers. Unlike kde4libs in the KDE
Softare Collection that it supercedes, it will not have bugfix only
releases.

Plasma 5 will most likely have a 3 month support/release cycle, with
bug fixes every month.

With respect to KDE Frameworks 5 and Plasma 5, the Kubuntu team makes
the following commitments :

* KDE Frameworks 5 will be updated to the last release until feature
freeze, since upstream does not offer any bug fix updates for KF5

* Any future releases of KDE Frameworks 5 after feature freeze will be
delivered via the Kubuntu PPA's

* Plasma 5 will be delivered via the Kubuntu Next PPA for the utopic
cycle in order to match up with upstreams faster cadence and to
stabalize our own packages


## Why do we want a separate ISO

Since Plasma 5 has undergone a huge change architechturally, we want
to play it safe, while also providing a way for users to provide
feedback to
upstream KDE. Since Plasma 5 has no history of bug fixes, we also
prefer not to get the packages into the archive and would not request
an MRE. Providing packages
via a PPA seems the most reasonable way to go about solving this
problem.  Note that even if Plasma 5 were suitable for MRE, the
libraries it depends on, KF5
are not, so post-release maintenance of KF5 will limited to security
fixes and cherry-picking selected patches for severe issues.  This may
impact our
ability to update Plasma 5 post-release in the PPA.

Once the software matures upstream, we plan to push the packages into
Ubuntu 15.04 once the archive opens, and then eventually switch to
Plasma 5
as the default desktop environment at some point in the future.

Until such a change happens, we would still like users to try out
Plasma 5 and provide feedback, which is why we would like a separate
ISO to be made from
packages from a PPA.

Cheers
Rohan Garg
For the Kubuntu Team

-- 
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel