Linus,
Please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/kvm-3.10-1
to receive the KVM updates for the 3.10 merge window.
Highlights of the updates are:
general:
- new emulated device API
- legacy device assignment is now optional
- irqfd interface is more generic and can
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:05:31 -0800
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > Please pull from
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/kvm-3.9-1
> >
> > to receive the KVM updates for the 3.9 merge window [..]
>
> Ok, particularly
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Please pull from
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/kvm-3.9-1
>
> to receive the KVM updates for the 3.9 merge window [..]
Ok, particularly the s390 people should check me resolution of the
conflicts, since they inclu
Linus,
Please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/kvm-3.9-1
to receive the KVM updates for the 3.9 merge window, including x86 real
mode emulation fixes, stronger memory slot interface restrictions,
mmu_lock spinlock hold time reduction, improved handling of large
pa
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Actually only in my tree (until Alexander cleans his tree up). I am
> going to have a conversation with Alexander about process.
Ok, as long as it's contained, I guess I'll pull.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
Hi Linus,
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:22:34 -0800 Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > There is a section of this tree (the kvm-ppc tree in linux-next) that has
> > been rebased before being merged into this tree. Alexander, please
> > don't
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> There is a section of this tree (the kvm-ppc tree in linux-next) that has
> been rebased before being merged into this tree. Alexander, please
> don't do that (especially since it has *not* bee rebased in the kvm-ppc
> tree but more wo
Hi Marcello, Alexander,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:35:19 -0200 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Please pull from
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/kvm-3.8-1
>
> to receive the KVM updates for the 3.8 merge window, including
> considerable KVM/PPC work, x86 kvmclock vsyscall support,
Linus,
Please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/kvm-3.8-1
to receive the KVM updates for the 3.8 merge window, including
considerable KVM/PPC work, x86 kvmclock vsyscall support, IA32_TSC_ADJUST
MSR emulation, amongst others.
Alex Williamson (2):
KVM: F
Linus, please pull from the repo and tag at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/kvm-3.7-1
to receive the KVM updates for the 3.7 merge windows. Highlights of the
changes for this release include support for vfio level triggered interrupts,
improved big real mode support on olde
On 2012-09-11 10:50, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 02:03 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Avi Kivity writes:
>>
>>> Please pull from:
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master
>>>
>>> to merge some kvm updates, most notably a port of qemu-kvm's pre-vfio device
>>> ass
On 09/11/2012 02:03 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity writes:
>
>> Please pull from:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master
>>
>> to merge some kvm updates, most notably a port of qemu-kvm's pre-vfio device
>> assignment. With this there are no significant cha
Avi Kivity writes:
> Please pull from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master
>
> to merge some kvm updates, most notably a port of qemu-kvm's pre-vfio device
> assignment. With this there are no significant changes left between qemu and
> qemu-kvm (though some work r
On 09/10/2012 06:49 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:32:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-09-10 17:25, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> > Please pull from:
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master
>> >
>> > to merge some kvm updates, most notably
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:32:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-09-10 17:25, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Please pull from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master
> >
> > to merge some kvm updates, most notably a port of qemu-kvm's pre-vfio device
> > assignment. W
Linus, please pull from the repo and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/kvm-3.6-2
to receive a trio of KVM fixes: incorrect lookup of guest cpuid,
an uninitialized variable fix, and error path cleanup fix.
Shortlog/diffstat follow.
--
On 2012-09-10 17:25, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Please pull from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master
>
> to merge some kvm updates, most notably a port of qemu-kvm's pre-vfio device
> assignment. With this there are no significant changes left between qemu and
> qemu-kvm
Please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master
to merge some kvm updates, most notably a port of qemu-kvm's pre-vfio device
assignment. With this there are no significant changes left between qemu and
qemu-kvm (though some work remains).
---
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:38:36 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 12:04 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Ok, this caused conflicts with the s390 and ppc trees. I think I fixed
> > them correctly, but the respective arch people really should take a
> > look.
>
> A quick p
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 12:04 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok, this caused conflicts with the s390 and ppc trees. I think I fixed
> them correctly, but the respective arch people really should take a
> look.
A quick peek at the merge commit looks allright, but Alex mentioned that
there's some more
Ok, this caused conflicts with the s390 and ppc trees. I think I fixed
them correctly, but the respective arch people really should take a
look.
Linus
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Linus, please pull from the repo and tag at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pu
Linus, please pull from the repo and tag at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/kvm-3.6-1
to merge the KVM updates for the 3.5 merge window.
Highlights include
- full big real mode emulation on pre-Westmere Intel hosts (can be disabled
with emulate_invalid_guest_state=0)
-
Linus,
Please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git master
to receive a build fix for non-kvm archs and a transparent hugepage
refcount bugfix on hosts with 4M pages.
Avi Kivity (1):
KVM: Export asm-generic/kvm_para.h
Xiao Guangrong (1):
KVM: MMU: fix huge pag
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:13:15PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > KVM guest: make kvm_para_available() check hypervisor bit reading
> > cpuid leaf
>
> I've reported this patch to cause a hang on hypervisors that don't set
> the
Hi Avi,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> KVM guest: make kvm_para_available() check hypervisor bit reading
> cpuid leaf
I've reported this patch to cause a hang on hypervisors that don't set
the hypervisor bit. Can we somehow fix that before this patch actually
goes into
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Linus, please pull the KVM updates for the 3.5 cycle from
Ok. The way I resolved a the x86 kvm_para.h conflict, I suspect it is
now being *unnecessarily* careful about doing the CPUID thing, and I
think that the "cpuid_level < 0" check that cam
Linus, please pull the KVM updates for the 3.5 cycle from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git next
Changes include additional instruction emulation, page-crossing MMIO,
faster dirty logging, preventing the watchdog from killing a stopped
guest, module autoload, a new MSI ABI, and some
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git master
To receive the following updates
Alex Williamson (2):
KVM: unmap pages from the iommu when slots are removed
KVM: lock slots_lock around device assignment
Avi Kivity (1):
KVM: VMX: Fix kvm_set_share
On 04/17/2012 12:34 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> tree but his tree is in linux-next as well. There's no reason not to do
>>> that.
>>>
>>> That way, his next branch gets linux-next coverage whether it's in my
>>> tree or not, and I pull when I put the final powerpc-next together,
>>> which gives m
On 04/17/2012 09:20 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/17/2012 02:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 15:53 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
kvm.git next is exposed to linux-next, where they get tested quite a
lot. Granted it's mostly build testing, and people are unlikely to
test
kvm
On 04/17/2012 02:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 15:53 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > kvm.git next is exposed to linux-next, where they get tested quite a
> > lot. Granted it's mostly build testing, and people are unlikely to
> > test
> > kvm there, but they will te
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 15:53 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> kvm.git next is exposed to linux-next, where they get tested quite a
> lot. Granted it's mostly build testing, and people are unlikely to
> test
> kvm there, but they will test the non-kvm bits that creep in there.
>
> > The alternative wo
On 16.04.2012, at 14:53, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 03:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 02.04.2012, at 11:46, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 12:06 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> The current process is such that it takes absolutely forever for our
> patche
On 04/16/2012 03:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 02.04.2012, at 11:46, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 12:06 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>> The current process is such that it takes absolutely forever for our
> >>> patches to get in, which is a major PITA for something i
On 02.04.2012, at 11:46, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 12:06 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> The current process is such that it takes absolutely forever for our
>>> patches to get in, which is a major PITA for something in such state of
>>> active development.
>>
>> If the
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 12:06 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > The current process is such that it takes absolutely forever for our
> > patches to get in, which is a major PITA for something in such state of
> > active development.
>
> If the patches were posted two weeks earlier, they would have gone i
On 04/02/2012 01:45 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:38:37PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 03/30/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > > I just noticed that the branch you asked Linus to pull includes none
> > > of the patches that Alex sent you in the last batch, in the
On 04/02/2012 12:02 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 15:38 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 03/30/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > > I just noticed that the branch you asked Linus to pull includes none
> > > of the patches that Alex sent you in the last batch, in the
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:38:37PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/30/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > I just noticed that the branch you asked Linus to pull includes none
> > of the patches that Alex sent you in the last batch, in the email with
> > subject "[PULL 00/56] ppc patch queue 2
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 15:38 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/30/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > I just noticed that the branch you asked Linus to pull includes none
> > of the patches that Alex sent you in the last batch, in the email with
> > subject "[PULL 00/56] ppc patch queue 2012-03-
On 03/30/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> I just noticed that the branch you asked Linus to pull includes none
> of the patches that Alex sent you in the last batch, in the email with
> subject "[PULL 00/56] ppc patch queue 2012-03-15" sent on March 15,
> where he asked you to pull git://gith
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:09:44PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > There are patches from me in there that have been pending since
> > December last year, and now look like they won't be going upstream
> > until June. So, under the circumstances, how would you (Avi) feel
> > about Ben and I committi
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Linus, what's your feeling here ? I'd really like to have the bulk of
> the powerpc updates this time around, they already missed the previous
> merge window due to maintainers taking too long to deal with their
> inbox :-)
If the
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 12:09 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> That's fine if there are no interdependencies. It looks like 74df956
> will be a problem though.
>
> The other two options are:
>
> - I'll add my signoff to the commits that lack it. This unbreaks the
> committer lacks signoff.
> - I remov
On 03/26/2012 11:38 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:09:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> > I can switch to fast-forward-only in the future, but I'm afraid that
> > this particular tree is broken for good. The un-rebased
> > fast-forward-only source for this is kvm.git master
On 03/26/2012 06:21 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> > Say a fix comes in which needs to be mainlined during -rc. So
> > I put it in some other branch, to be sent off to Linus in a
> > few days after maturing a little. Meanwhile developers see an
> > incomplete tree, since tha
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:09:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> I can switch to fast-forward-only in the future, but I'm afraid that
> this particular tree is broken for good. The un-rebased
> fast-forward-only source for this is kvm.git master, which I don't think
> you want to pull. It will caus
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:05 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Say a fix comes in which needs to be mainlined during -rc. So I put it
> in some other branch, to be sent off to Linus in a few days after
> maturing a little. Meanwhile developers see an incomplete tree, since
> that patch is not in it.
>
* Avi Kivity wrote:
> Say a fix comes in which needs to be mainlined during -rc. So
> I put it in some other branch, to be sent off to Linus in a
> few days after maturing a little. Meanwhile developers see an
> incomplete tree, since that patch is not in it.
>
> Once Linus pulls, I can me
On 03/25/2012 10:51 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 12:09 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> > Well I've been doing this ever since I moved to git. The motivation was
> > actually to make things easier for patch authors by allowing them to
> > work against a tree of all applied
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 12:09 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Well I've been doing this ever since I moved to git. The motivation was
> actually to make things easier for patch authors by allowing them to
> work against a tree of all applied patches, while the update for the
> next merge window is just
On 03/23/2012 05:15 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > That means that everything gets constantly rebased, and it makes life
> > very much harder for us working with this.
>
> Ben, thanks for pointing this out.
>
> I will not be pul
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> That means that everything gets constantly rebased, and it makes life
> very much harder for us working with this.
Ben, thanks for pointing this out.
I will not be pulling this tree at all. It's pure and utter shit, and
I wonder
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:08 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Linus, please pull from
>
> ra.kernel.org:/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.4
>
> (ssh URL as git.kernel.org is down at the moment) to receive the KVM
> updates for the 3.4 merge window. Changes include timekeeping
> improvements, s
Linus, please pull from
ra.kernel.org:/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.4
(ssh URL as git.kernel.org is down at the moment) to receive the KVM
updates for the 3.4 merge window. Changes include timekeeping
improvements, support for assigning host PCI devices that share
interrupt lines, s
On 03/02/2012 01:45 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 01.03.2012 13:47, schrieb Avi Kivity:
> > Avi Kivity (1):
> > pc-bios: update kvmvapic.bin
> >
> > Gleb Natapov (1):
> > kvm: Synchronize cpu state in kvm_arch_stop_on_emulation_error()
> >
> > Jan Kiszka (10):
> > kvm: Set cpu_
On 03/01/2012 06:47 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
This batch of updates is mostly Jan's rework of qemu-kvm's TPR
optimization for 32-bit Windows, making Windows XP much faster with kvm
enabled on older Intel and any AMD hardware. Any similarities to the
original hack are purely coincidental.
Please pul
Am 01.03.2012 13:47, schrieb Avi Kivity:
> Avi Kivity (1):
> pc-bios: update kvmvapic.bin
>
> Gleb Natapov (1):
> kvm: Synchronize cpu state in kvm_arch_stop_on_emulation_error()
>
> Jan Kiszka (10):
> kvm: Set cpu_single_env only once
> Remove useless casts from cpu itera
This batch of updates is mostly Jan's rework of qemu-kvm's TPR
optimization for 32-bit Windows, making Windows XP much faster with kvm
enabled on older Intel and any AMD hardware. Any similarities to the
original hack are purely coincidental.
Please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt
Linus, please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.3
Fixing a regression with the PMU MSRs when PMU virtualization is
disabled, a guest-internal DoS with the SYSCALL instruction, and a dirty
memory logging race that may cause live migration to fail.
Gleb Natap
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.3
to receive the KVM updates for the 3.3 cycle. Changes include a virtual
PMU available for guests, an MMU/MMIO speedup, more cpuid feature
whitelisting, and cleanups.
The branch contains tip/perf, which you'v
(now with [GIT PULL] for filters)
Linus, please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.2
This includes a ppc ABI breakage fix, s390 fixes, a tracing/kvmclock
conflict fix, and the implementation of guest-only/host-only profiling
for Intel. The latter is not str
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.2
(temporary location until virt/kvm is restored) to receive the KVM
updates for the 3.2 cycle:
Alexander Graf (12):
KVM: PPC: move compute_tlbie_rb to book3s common header
KVM: PPC: Add
Linus, please pull from:
git://github.com/avikivity/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.1
to receive an emulator fix affecting shld/shrd and a softmmu issue on
i386 hosts.
Avi Kivity (1):
KVM: x86 emulator: fix Src2CL decode
Zhao Jin (1):
KVM: MMU: fix incorrect return of spte
arch/x86/kvm
Linus,
Please pull from
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.1
to receive fixes for Kconfig problems introduced by the KVM steal time
implementation.
Randy Dunlap (2):
KVM: fix TASK_DELAY_ACCT kconfig warning
KVM: uses TASKSTATS, depends on NET
arch/
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.1
to get the KVM updates for the current merge window. Major features
include powerpc hypervisor-mode support and an initial version of VMX
nesting. Other changes include steal time support (both host and
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.0
to receive several (fairly serious) KVM fixes: kvmclock was broken due
to bad asm constraints, live migration & vga tracking instantiated large
ptes instead of small ones, and the guest cr3 was corrupted in
Linus, please pull from
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/3.0
to receive a few KVM fixes for -rc2. In particular, guest in/out
instructions have been faulting when they shouldn't have.
Heiko Carstens (1):
KVM: add missing void __user * cast to access_ok()
Linus, please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.40
to receive the KVM updates for the 2.6.40 cycle. Changes this time
include emulator correctness (segment checks, nested SVM intercepts),
16-byte MMIO, Via CPU feature support, virtual TSC rate for newe
Linus, please pull from the repo/branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.39
to receive a fix for virtualized cpuid and a host irqfd oops, as well as
a patch that enables asynchronous page faults, which was merged in
2.6.38 but not enabled.
Andre Przywara (2
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.39
To receive the following updates.
Avi Kivity (11):
KVM: MMU: Don't flush shadow when enabling dirty tracking
KVM: VMX: Save and restore tr selector across mode switches
KVM: VMX: Avoid
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>> I implemented get_user_pages_nowait() on top of your patch. In my testing
>> it works as expected when used inside KVM. Does this looks OK to you?
>
> It looks reasonable, although
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> I implemented get_user_pages_nowait() on top of your patch. In my testing
> it works as expected when used inside KVM. Does this looks OK to you?
It looks reasonable, although I suspect the subtle behavior wrt the
mmap_sem means that you sh
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:53:14PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > Now that we have FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY, the async
> > pagefault patches can be a little smaller.
>
> I suspect you do still want a new page flag, to say that
> FAULT_FL
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> Now that we have FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY, the async
> pagefault patches can be a little smaller.
I suspect you do still want a new page flag, to say that
FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY shouldn't actually wait for the page that it
allows retry for.
On 01/11/2011 04:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/10/2011 09:31 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Why wasn't I notified
before-hand? Was Andrew cc'd?
Andrew and linux-mm were copied. Rik was the only one who reviewed (and
ack'ed) it. I guess I should have explicitly asked for Nick's review.
Last tim
On 01/11/2011 06:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
What are your issues with the patch?
My issues are mainly two-fold:
- I think "MINOR" is a totally idiotic and meaningless term. It has
no technical meaning. Why would IO be special? Is it becau
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> What are your issues with the patch?
My issues are mainly two-fold:
- I think "MINOR" is a totally idiotic and meaningless term. It has
no technical meaning. Why would IO be special? Is it because of
deadlock concerns with filesystem or blo
On 01/10/2011 09:31 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> - asynchronous page faults, which allow a guest to continue processing
> interrupts even when its memory is being paged in; in the case of a Linux
> 2.6.38+ guest, it will receive a notificati
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> - asynchronous page faults, which allow a guest to continue processing
> interrupts even when its memory is being paged in; in the case of a Linux
> 2.6.38+ guest, it will receive a notification that the host is servicing a
> page fault, and m
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.38
to receive the KVM updates for the 2.6.38 merge window. Major features
include
- asynchronous page faults, which allow a guest to continue processing
interrupts even when its memory is being paged in;
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.37
to get a few KVM fixes for 2.6.37-rc6. Two of the fixes are for forward
compatibility with Bulldozer processors, one is a live migration fix,
and one an ordinary preemption counter leak fix.
Andre Prz
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.37
To receive the following updates:
Avi Kivity (2):
KVM: Correct ordering of ldt reload wrt fs/gs reload
KVM: VMX: Fix host userspace gsbase corruption
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |2 +-
arch/x86
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.37
To receive the following updates:
Jan Kiszka (1):
KVM: x86: Issue smp_call_function_many with preemption disabled
Marcelo Tosatti (1):
KVM: MMU: fix rmap_remove on non present sptes
Michae
On 10/26/2010 05:55 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Alex, if you want them in, please prepare backports for 2.6.36.1.
Why backports for 2.6.36.1 when we're talking about 2.6.27? Most of them fix
bugs introduced by the PV framework.
I should have said 2.6.37-rc1, sorry.
--
error compiling commi
On 25.10.2010, at 09:59, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 06:49 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:29:12 +0200
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> >Linus, the repository and branch
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.37
>> >
>> > contains the kv
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:29:12 +0200
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Linus, the repository and branch
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.37
>
> contains the kvm updates for the 2.6.37 merge window. Major changes
> this time around include powerpc paravirtualization, a vi
On 10/25/2010 06:49 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:29:12 +0200
Avi Kivity wrote:
>Linus, the repository and branch
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.37
>
> contains the kvm updates for the 2.6.37 merge window. Major changes
> this time a
Hey Linus,
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:29:12 +0200 Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> Linus, the repository and branch
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.37
>
> contains the kvm updates for the 2.6.37 merge window. Major changes
> this time around include powerpc paravirtual
Linus, the repository and branch
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.37
contains the kvm updates for the 2.6.37 merge window. Major changes
this time around include powerpc paravirtualization, a virtual tsc
rework, and exposing npt to the guest for fast nested vir
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.36
To receive the fix for CVE-2010-3698.
Avi Kivity (1):
KVM: Fix fs/gs reload oops with invalid ldt
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 24
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.36
To receive the following updates:
Avi Kivity (1):
KVM: Fix reboot on Intel hosts
Michael S. Tsirkin (1):
KVM: fix irqfd assign/deassign race
virt/kvm/eventfd.c |3 ++-
virt/kvm/kvm_mai
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.36
To receive the following updates:
Avi Kivity (2):
KVM: x86 emulator: fix regression with cmpxchg8b on i386 hosts
KVM: fix i8259 oops when no vcpus are online
Gleb Natapov (1):
KVM: i825
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.36
to receive the KVM updates for the 2.6.36 cycle. No major features:
mostly improved mmu and emulator correctness, some performance
improvements, and support for guest XSAVE and AVX.
Alex Williamson (
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.35
To receive the following updates:
Avi Kivity (1):
KVM: VMX: Fix host MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE corruption
Xiao Guangrong (1):
KVM: MMU: flush remote tlbs when overwriting spte with different pfn
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> Ok. I've dropped the SRAO patch; this still leaves ~100 changed lines, but
> they are almost all due to the erratum 383 workaround, which can result in a
> guest killing the host. The rest of the patches are less critical, but they
> are on
On 06/10/2010 07:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.35
to receive a bunch of KVM fixes for 2.6.35-rc2, including a workaround for a
cpu erratum that can all
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Linus, please pull from
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.35
>
> to receive a bunch of KVM fixes for 2.6.35-rc2, including a workaround for a
> cpu erratum that can allow a guest to crash the host.
Hmm. This loo
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.35
to receive a bunch of KVM fixes for 2.6.35-rc2, including a workaround
for a cpu erratum that can allow a guest to crash the host.
Avi Kivity (1):
KVM: MMU: Remove user access when allowing kernel
Linus, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git kvm-updates/2.6.35
to receive the KVM updates for the 2.6.35 merge window. Highlights
include a ppc64 port, timekeeping improvements, a lot of emulator work,
and perf integration.
Shortlog/diffstat below. Messy due to
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
