On 01/04/2010 05:12 PM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
On Sun January 3 2010, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
On Sun December 27 2009, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/27/2009 07:00 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Also, qemu might be leaking memory. Please post 'pmap $pid' for all
of your guests (do th
On 01/04/2010 08:12 AM, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> Would this be normal for my setup? The virt usage seems abnormally high for
> all of my guests, especially the ones using over 800MB virt.
>
As I understand it virtual memory usage shows the allocated address
ranges (library mappings, dynamic
On Sun January 3 2010, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> On Sun December 27 2009, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 12/27/2009 07:00 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> > >> Also, qemu might be leaking memory. Please post 'pmap $pid' for all
> > >> of your guests (do that before any of the other tests, on your
> > >> swa
On Sun December 27 2009, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/27/2009 07:00 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> >> Also, qemu might be leaking memory. Please post 'pmap $pid' for all
> >> of your guests (do that before any of the other tests, on your
> >> swapped-out system).
> >
> >
On 12/31/2009 08:36 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
I believe Avi has seen the problem and is motivated to
get the patch into -stable :)
I did not actually see the problem myself.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe f
Hi, Hugh.
On Thursday, 31 December 2009 17:02:49 +,
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> >
> > What tests would be recommendable to make to reproduce the problem?
>
> Oh, I thought you were the one seeing the problem! If you cannot
> easily reproduce it, then
On 12/31/2009 12:02 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
What tests would be recommendable to make to reproduce the problem?
Oh, I thought you were the one seeing the problem! If you cannot
easily reproduce it, then please don't spend too long over it.
I've nev
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>
> What tests would be recommendable to make to reproduce the problem?
Oh, I thought you were the one seeing the problem! If you cannot
easily reproduce it, then please don't spend too long over it.
I've never noticed it myself (perhaps because my wor
Hi, Hugh.
On Wednesday, 30 December 2009 18:14:30 +,
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On 12/27/2009 12:12 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 12/27/2009 06:45 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > If so, it doesn't copy sta...@kernel.org. Is it queued for -st
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 12/27/2009 12:12 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 12/27/2009 06:45 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > >
> > > > If so, it doesn't copy sta...@kernel.org. Is it queued for -stable?
> > >
> > > I do not believe that it is queued for -stable.
> > >
> > > Do perfor
Hi, Avi.
On Sunday, 27 December 2009 18:03:18 +0200,
Avi Kivity wrote:
>> I installed qemu-kvm-0.12.1.1 in one equipment of my house yesterday
>> to test it with Linux 2.6.32 compiled by myself from the source code
>> of kernel.org.
>>
>> From the night of yesterday that I am observing a high use
Hi, Avi.
On Sunday, 27 December 2009 19:33:31 +0200,
Avi Kivity wrote:
Also, qemu might be leaking memory. Please post 'pmap $pid' for
all of your guests (do that before any of the other tests, on your
swapped-out system).
>>> --
On 12/27/2009 07:20 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/27/2009 07:00 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Also, qemu might be leaking memory. Please post 'pmap $pid' for all of
your guests (do that before any of the other tests, on your swapped-out
system).
On 12/27/2009 12:12 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/27/2009 06:45 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
If so, it doesn't copy sta...@kernel.org. Is it queued for -stable?
I do not believe that it is queued for -stable.
Do performance fixes fit with -stable policy?
If it is a serious regression, I believe
On 12/27/2009 07:00 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Also, qemu might be leaking memory. Please post 'pmap $pid' for all of
your guests (do that before any of the other tests, on your swapped-out
system).
-
total
On 12/27/2009 06:45 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
If so, it doesn't copy sta...@kernel.org. Is it queued for -stable?
I do not believe that it is queued for -stable.
Do performance fixes fit with -stable policy?
If it is a serious regression, I believe it fits.
--
error compiling committee.c:
Hi, Avi.
On Sunday, 27 December 2009 18:03:18 +0200,
Avi Kivity wrote:
>> I installed qemu-kvm-0.12.1.1 in one equipment of my house yesterday
>> to test it with Linux 2.6.32 compiled by myself from the source code
>> of kernel.org.
>> [...]
>>
>> This is what I obtain with 'free' in the host:
>
On 12/27/2009 11:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/27/2009 06:32 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
Probably a regression in Linux swapping. Rik, Hugh, are you aware of
any? Hugh posted something but it appears to be performance related, not
causing early swap.
Yes, it is a smal bug in the VM.
A fix has be
On 12/27/2009 06:32 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
Probably a regression in Linux swapping. Rik, Hugh, are you aware of
any? Hugh posted something but it appears to be performance related, not
causing early swap.
Yes, it is a smal bug in the VM.
A fix has been committed to 2.6.33 already.
Is this
On 12/27/2009 11:03 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/27/2009 05:51 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Hi, all!
I installed qemu-kvm-0.12.1.1 in one equipment of my house yesterday to
test it with Linux 2.6.32 compiled by myself from the source code of
kernel.org.
From the night of yesterday that I am observ
On 12/27/2009 05:51 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Hi, all!
I installed qemu-kvm-0.12.1.1 in one equipment of my house yesterday to
test it with Linux 2.6.32 compiled by myself from the source code of
kernel.org.
From the night of yesterday that I am observing a high use of swap. This
is the Servic
Hi, all!
I installed qemu-kvm-0.12.1.1 in one equipment of my house yesterday to
test it with Linux 2.6.32 compiled by myself from the source code of
kernel.org.
From the night of yesterday that I am observing a high use of swap. This
is the Service Log Entries from Nagios:
12-26-2009 21:57:33
22 matches
Mail list logo
