Hi there,
This is a version calling for comments. Some minor changes should be
done before final commitment (TODOs in it), because these places are
related to the bugs I have commited in the previous weeks and the
relevant patches are not accpeted. But these bugs are all about some
unexpected
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:35:16PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
Hi there,
This is a version calling for comments. Some minor changes should be
Add RFC before PATCH for such submission please.
done before final commitment (TODOs in it), because these places are
related to the bugs I have
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:35:16PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
Hi there,
This is a version calling for comments. Some minor changes should be
Add RFC before PATCH for such submission please.
done before final commitment
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:53:56PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:35:16PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
Hi there,
This is a version calling for comments. Some minor changes should be
Add RFC
Il 16/07/2013 11:27, Arthur Chunqi Li ha scritto:
This is the first version for VMX nested environment test case. It
contains the basic VMX instructions test cases, including VMXON/
VMXOFF/VMXPTRLD/VMXPTRST/VMCLEAR/VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME/VMCALL. This patch
also tests the basic execution routine in
Hi Paolo,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 16/07/2013 11:27, Arthur Chunqi Li ha scritto:
This is the first version for VMX nested environment test case. It
contains the basic VMX instructions test cases, including VMXON/
Il 16/07/2013 13:47, Arthur Chunqi Li ha scritto:
setjmp and longjmp is not implemented in our test environment, and
these two functions are highly depend on architecture. Do you think we
need to write a general code for both 32bit and 64bit, or just write
specific one just for this test case?
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:28:05PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
+void vmx_exit(void)
+{
+ test_vmxoff();
+ printf(\nSUMMARY: %d tests, %d failures\n, tests, fails);
+ exit(fails ? -1 : 0);
+}
Can you try to
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:28:05PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
+void vmx_exit(void)
+{
+ test_vmxoff();
+ printf(\nSUMMARY: %d tests, %d failures\n, tests, fails);
+ exit(fails ? -1 : 0);
+}
Can you try to jump back to main, and do test_vmxoff there? This will
avoid having
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:29:20PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:28:05PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
+void vmx_exit(void)
+{
+ test_vmxoff();
+ printf(\nSUMMARY: %d tests, %d
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:29:20PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:28:05PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
+void vmx_exit(void)
Il 16/07/2013 19:13, Arthur Chunqi Li ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:29:20PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:28:05PM
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 01:13:56AM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:29:20PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16,
13 matches
Mail list logo
