Am 13.04.2011 21:26, schrieb Prasad Joshi:
The patch only implements the basic read write support for QCOW version 1
images. Many of the QCOW features are not implmented, for example
- image creation
- snapshot
- copy-on-write
- encryption
Yay, more forks, more code duplication!
Have
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Also at least your qcow1.c is lacking the copyright header. Please add this,
otherwise you're violating the license.
AFAICT it's not a copy, it's a reimplementation - and he credited you in the
CREDITS file, for providing a reference implementation. But
Am 14.04.2011 10:07, schrieb Ingo Molnar:
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Also at least your qcow1.c is lacking the copyright header. Please add this,
otherwise you're violating the license.
AFAICT it's not a copy, it's a reimplementation - and he credited you in the
CREDITS
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Also at least your qcow1.c is lacking the copyright header. Please add this,
otherwise you're violating the license.
Am 14.04.2011 10:07, schrieb Ingo Molnar:
AFAICT it's not a copy, it's a reimplementation - and he credited you in the
CREDITS file, for
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Have you thought about a way to actually share code with qemu instead of
repeating Xen's mistake of copying code, modifying it until merges are
no longer possible and then let it bitrot?
No we haven't and we're not planning
Am 14.04.2011 10:15, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Also at least your qcow1.c is lacking the copyright header. Please add
this,
otherwise you're violating the license.
Am 14.04.2011 10:07, schrieb Ingo Molnar:
AFAICT it's not a copy, it's a reimplementation -
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 14.04.2011 10:07, schrieb Ingo Molnar:
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Also at least your qcow1.c is lacking the copyright header. Please add
this,
otherwise you're violating the license.
AFAICT it's not a copy, it's a
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 14.04.2011 10:15, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Also at least your qcow1.c is lacking the copyright header. Please add
this,
otherwise you're violating the license.
Am 14.04.2011 10:07, schrieb Ingo Molnar:
Am 14.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Have you thought about a way to actually share code with qemu instead of
repeating Xen's mistake of copying code, modifying it until merges are
no longer possible and then let it
Hi Kevin!
Am 14.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Have you thought about a way to actually share code with qemu instead of
repeating Xen's mistake of copying code, modifying it until merges are
no longer possible and then
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:32:21AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hi Kevin!
Am 14.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Have you thought about a way to actually share code with qemu instead of
repeating Xen's mistake of
Am 14.04.2011 10:32, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
Hi Kevin!
Am 14.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Have you thought about a way to actually share code with qemu instead of
repeating Xen's mistake of copying code, modifying it
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 14.04.2011 10:15, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
* Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Also at least your qcow1.c is lacking the copyright header. Please add
this,
otherwise you're
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 14.04.2011 10:32, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
Hi Kevin!
Am 14.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Have you thought about a way to actually share code with qemu instead of
repeating Xen's
* Prasad Joshi prasadjoshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Speaking about the code of finding the cluster offset is so basic, that I
thought it should be implemented the way it is done in the QEMU. But none of
the code is copied from the QEMU sources. The complete code is written from
scratch with
Am 14.04.2011 11:26, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 14.04.2011 10:32, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
Hi Kevin!
Am 14.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Have you thought about a way to actually
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:26:07AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 14.04.2011 10:32, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
Hi Kevin!
Am 14.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Have you
On 4/14/11 12:23 PM, Prasad Joshi wrote:
Oh God. I was walking to university on seventh cloud, hoping to work
on caching the l2 table. Now I find myslef under the controversy.
Again, it's my fault, not yours. I asked to remove the license banner on
top of qcow1.c because it doesn't contain
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 14.04.2011 11:26, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 14.04.2011 10:32, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
Hi Kevin!
Am 14.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Pekka Enberg:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/14/2011 03:52 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Well, copying in itself is not a big problem as long as the copies are
kept in sync. It's a bit painful, but manageable. Implementing every
image format twice (and implementing image formats in a reliable and
performing way isn't trivial) is much more
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Prasad Joshi wrote:
The patch only implements the basic read write support for QCOW version 1
images. Many of the QCOW features are not implmented, for example
Applied, thanks!
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm
21 matches
Mail list logo
