On 08/19/2009 01:31 AM, duck wrote:
I have never got this to work reliably. Occasionally I can get as far as
making a debugger connection at boot-time, IIRC, but have never managed to
use the deugger at all. You always seem to end up in some
debugger-debuggee deadlock.
It works.
However,
On 08/18/2009 01:52 PM, Tom Parkin wrote:
2009/8/17 Tom Parkintom.par...@gmail.com:
Thanks so much for that, Yan, it looks exactly like what I need. I'll
give it a try when I'm back in the office.
Having given it a try, I'm having some troubles which I hope someone
may be able to
Hi Vadim,
2009/8/18 Vadim Rozenfeld vroze...@redhat.com:
Try to download symbols first.
Thanks for the tip, it gets me a bit closer -- although still not
fully up and running !
With the symbols installed, and the windbg symbol path set, the windbg
process doesn't exit, and does print Connected
Hi Yan,
2009/8/18 Yan Vugenfirer yvuge...@redhat.com:
In case you don’t need to debug the boot process you could wait for the
Windows to start and only then start Windbg configure the communication
options and hit break (ctrl+break) to initiate debug session.
That would be fine; I have no
On 08/18/2009 04:54 PM, Tom Parkin wrote:
Hi Vadim,
2009/8/18 Vadim Rozenfeldvroze...@redhat.com:
Try to download symbols first.
Thanks for the tip, it gets me a bit closer -- although still not
fully up and running !
With the symbols installed, and the windbg symbol path set, the
2009/8/18 Vadim Rozenfeld vroze...@redhat.com:
did you try /break switch in boot.ini?
It's a new one to me. I've just given it a go and found no change in
behavior, from which I deduce that the target machine isn't getting as
far even as the HAL init (although this might be an incorrect reading
I have never got this to work reliably. Occasionally I can get as far as
making a debugger connection at boot-time, IIRC, but have never managed to
use the deugger at all. You always seem to end up in some
debugger-debuggee deadlock.
I suspect that the serial link simulation is imperfect
2009/8/17 Tom Parkin tom.par...@gmail.com:
Has anyone on the list got any experience of this kind of setup, or
any suggestions that might help ?
Sorry for the spam, but I forgot to mention that I found this mail in
the archives which looks pertinent:
(copying smintz)
On 08/17/2009 06:16 PM, Tom Parkin wrote:
2009/8/17 Tom Parkintom.par...@gmail.com:
Has anyone on the list got any experience of this kind of setup, or
any suggestions that might help ?
Sorry for the spam, but I forgot to mention that I found this mail in
the
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of Tom Parkin
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 6:16 PM
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tom.par...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Using KVM for Windows kernel debugging
2009/8/17 Tom Parkin tom.par
] On
Behalf Of Tom Parkin
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 6:16 PM
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tom.par...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Using KVM for Windows kernel debugging
2009/8/17 Tom Parkin tom.par...@gmail.com:
Has anyone on the list got any experience of this kind of setup, or
any suggestions
11 matches
Mail list logo
