On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 22:24 +0300, Ben-Ami Yassour wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:16 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Ben-Ami Yassour wrote:
I am running virtio with the latest KVM code, and see a significant
performance issue.
Ping to the host (or any other close machine) reports a
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 11:49 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 22:24 +0300, Ben-Ami Yassour wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:16 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Ben-Ami Yassour wrote:
I am running virtio with the latest KVM code, and see a significant
performance issue.
I am running virtio with the latest KVM code, and see a significant
performance issue.
Ping to the host (or any other close machine) reports a 4ms delay.
In the same setup with an e1000 emulation (just changing model=virtio to
model=e1000 in the KVM command line), ping reports 0.177ms delay.
Ben-Ami Yassour wrote:
I am running virtio with the latest KVM code, and see a significant
performance issue.
Ping to the host (or any other close machine) reports a 4ms delay.
What kvm version and what host kernel version?
It's very easy to mistakenly compile qemu without GSO support
Ben-Ami Yassour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ben,
I am running virtio with the latest KVM code, and see a significant
performance issue.
Ping to the host (or any other close machine) reports a 4ms delay.
In the same setup with an e1000 emulation (just changing model=virtio to
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:16 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Ben-Ami Yassour wrote:
I am running virtio with the latest KVM code, and see a significant
performance issue.
Ping to the host (or any other close machine) reports a 4ms delay.
What kvm version and what host kernel version?
