On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:12:58AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/26/2010 12:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Introduce exception-safe objects for calling system, vm, and vcpu ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:15:18AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/26/2010 04:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
+
+#include kvmxx.h
+#includeboost/function.hpp
This seems to use boost, which is not part of the standard library.
Do we want this dependency?
We'd need a configure check
On 11/28/2010 11:04 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:15:54AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/26/2010 04:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
+
+int main(int ac, char **av)
+{
+kvm::system system;
+kvm::vm vm(system);
+
On 11/28/2010 10:59 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:15:18AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/26/2010 04:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
+
+#include kvmxx.h
+#includeboost/function.hpp
This seems to use boost, which is not part of the standard
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:15:54AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/26/2010 04:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
+
+int main(int ac, char **av)
+{
+kvm::system system;
+kvm::vm vm(system);
+identity::setup_vm(vm);
+kvm::vcpu vcpu(vm, 0);
+identity::vcpu
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:44PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Modify inuse type to uint16_t, let save/load to handle, and revert
last_avail_idx with inuse if there are outstanding emulation.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
This changes migration format, so it
On 11/28/2010 10:58 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:12:58AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/26/2010 12:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Introduce exception-safe objects for calling system, vm, and vcpu
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:54PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Replace replace qemu_sendv_packet_async() with
qemu_sendv_packet_async_proxy() to let event-tap capture events from
virtio-net.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Why does every device need to know
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:52PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Replace bdrv_aio_writev() with bdrv_aio_writev_proxy() to let
event-tap capture events from dma-helpers.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Same comment as -net here: it's not clear when should
a
On 11/28/2010 09:54 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:50PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Record ioport event to replay it upon failover.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Interesting. This will have to be extended to support ioeventfd.
Since each eventfd is really just a binary trigger
it
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:38:36AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 09:54 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:31:09AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 10:58 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:12:58AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/26/2010 12:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 11:50 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Another problem is that there seem to be two memory allocations and a
copy here, apparently just to simplify error handling. It might be fine
for this test but won't scale for when performance matters.
When it matters, we can fix it.
Hi KVM Gurus. I need some help with this problem that has existed for
the past several kernel update releases. It used to work fine, probably
back around kernel 2.6.33, but now I can't run any of my usual VM's in
KVM with a PAE-enabled kernel.
WITH PAE enabled, and WITHOUT KVM enabled (by
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:44PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Modify inuse type to uint16_t, let save/load to handle, and revert
last_avail_idx with inuse if there are outstanding emulation.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:54PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Replace replace qemu_sendv_packet_async() with
qemu_sendv_packet_async_proxy() to let event-tap capture events from
virtio-net.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 11:50 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Another problem is that there seem to be two memory allocations and a
copy here, apparently just to simplify error handling. It might be fine
for this test but won't scale
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:27:58PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:44PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Modify inuse type to uint16_t, let save/load to handle, and revert
last_avail_idx with inuse if there are
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Introduce exception-safe objects for calling system, vm, and vcpu ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
api/kvmxx.cc | 168
++
api/kvmxx.h | 80
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:52PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Replace bdrv_aio_writev() with bdrv_aio_writev_proxy() to let
event-tap capture events from dma-helpers.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Same comment
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:14PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.11.2010, at 11:52, Avi Kivity wrote:
Introduce exception-safe objects for calling system, vm, and vcpu ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
FWIW, I still disagree with C++ and believe this code to
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:50PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Record ioport event to replay it upon failover.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
Interesting. This will have to be extended to support ioeventfd.
Since
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:41:26AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/24/2010 06:59 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.11.2010, at 11:52, Avi Kivity wrote:
Introduce exception-safe objects for calling system, vm, and vcpu ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com
FWIW, I still
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:55:28PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:52PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Replace bdrv_aio_writev() with bdrv_aio_writev_proxy() to let
event-tap capture events from dma-helpers.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can
On 11/28/2010 01:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
FWIW, I still disagree with C++ and believe this code to be hardly readable.
A major issue is existing tools.
Using C++ would prevent us from using sparce for static code checking.
C++ static checking is way better than anything sparse
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:39:13PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony,
28.11.2010 05:26, linux_...@proinbox.com wrote:
Hi list,
Being that the virtio interfaces are stated as acheiving 5-8 Gb
throughput now with vhost, as opposed to 1Gb without, how should their
link speed be defined when the choices are 2500M or 1M?
The reported link speed for _any_
On 11/28/2010 01:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 11:50 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Another problem is that there seem to be two memory allocations and a
copy here, apparently just to simplify error
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it
On 11/28/2010 01:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
+++ b/api/kvmxx.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+#include kvmxx.h
+#includefcntl.h
+#includesys/ioctl.h
+#includesys/mman.h
I just realized this is wrong: I think you should wrap
the headers in extern C. Same for other headers.
I think system
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 01:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
FWIW, I still disagree with C++ and believe this code to be hardly
readable.
A major issue is existing tools.
Using C++ would prevent us from using sparce for static code
On 11/28/2010 03:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 01:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
FWIW, I still disagree with C++ and believe this code to be hardly
readable.
A major issue is existing tools.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 01:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 11:50 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Another problem is that there seem to be two memory
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:15:52PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 01:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
+++ b/api/kvmxx.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+#include kvmxx.h
+#includefcntl.h
+#includesys/ioctl.h
+#includesys/mman.h
I just realized this is wrong: I think you should
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:34:39PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 03:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 01:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
FWIW, I still disagree with C++ and believe this code to be
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:22:42PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:45:34AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Suppose we add SCSI support to Seabios and suppose SCSI card Seabios can
natively boot from has
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:19:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:15:44PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:45:34AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Suppose we add SCSI support to
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:19:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at
Gleb Natapov wrote:
There is no way for qemu to know about BCVs or BEVs
This is very much the key point.
In order to have command line control over the boot process, the
machine and the firmware must agree on things.
I see two options:
1. QEMU works very very hard to provide a machine that
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:54:38PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:19:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at
Peter Stuge wrote:
Specifying boot device using PCI BDF is a great example of using
common structured data. That BDF exists both in machine and firmware
data models.
Gleb Natapov wrote:
Bus numbers are assigned by a guest. Qemu knows nothing about them,
so it specify device path by topology.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:00:29PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
There is no way for qemu to know about BCVs or BEVs
This is very much the key point.
In order to have command line control over the boot process, the
machine and the firmware must agree on things.
I see
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:09:48PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:54:38PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:19:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:11:45PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
Specifying boot device using PCI BDF is a great example of using
common structured data. That BDF exists both in machine and firmware
data models.
Gleb Natapov wrote:
Bus numbers are assigned by a guest.
On 11/28/2010 06:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:41:26AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/24/2010 06:59 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.11.2010, at 11:52, Avi Kivity wrote:
Introduce exception-safe objects for calling system, vm, and vcpu
On 11/28/2010 08:40 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This code is not reusable. Everywhere you use an fd, you have to
repeat this code.
But that's not a lot of code. And you can abstract it away at a higher
level. For example kvm_init and kvm_cleanup would setup/cleanup
state in a
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:04:34PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
To create an object on the stack, you must have the class definition in
a public header and a public constructor/destructor.
This is exactly the same in C.
It's really more of a design statement than a statement about C++ vs.
On 11/28/2010 04:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
But rather need to use ugly factory functions with all sorts of
DO_UPCAST. This is really unfriendly especially for writing test
cases.
Yes, I agree. Just moving memory allocation out of there
will fix most of the ugliness.
So
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Nikola Ciprich extmaill...@linuxbox.cz wrote:
Hello Thomas,
I t hink blkio-cgroup really can't help You here, but since NFS is
network protocol,
why not just consider some kind of network shaping?
n.
I thought about this, but it's rather imprecise I
Bugs item #2432316, was opened at 2008-12-16 10:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by haoxudong
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2432316group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
This patch adds a software management abstraction layer
on top of popular distro package management abstraction
layers. Frequently we want to install a given distro
provided software package, but there's no single interface
to do so.
The software manager API tries to expose conveniently the
main
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 00:44 -0200, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
This patch adds a software management abstraction layer
on top of popular distro package management abstraction
layers. Frequently we want to install a given distro
provided software package, but there's no single interface
to
Hi, all,
This is KVM test result against kvm.git
9ee00410d82a7c5cab5ae347d97fbf8a95c55506 based on kernel 2.6.37-rc2, and
qemu-kvm.git b377474e589e5a1fe2abc7b13fafa8bad802637a.
We found a new bug which qemu processor will be defunct process by be killed,
this bug block nightly testing, we got
When counting pages we should increase it by 1 instead of VHOST_PAGE_SIZE,
and also make log_write() can correctly process the request across
pages with write_address not start at page boundary.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 20 +---
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com
---
drivers/vhost/net.c |2 +-
drivers/vhost/vhost.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index d10da28..14fc189 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++
Bugs item #2525768, was opened at 2009-01-21 08:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jessorensen
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2525768group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #2796640, was opened at 2009-05-26 03:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jessorensen
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2796640group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #1885747, was opened at 2008-02-03 16:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jessorensen
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=1885747group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
65 matches
Mail list logo
