The old MSI-X enabling method assume the entries are written before MSI-X
enabled, but some OS didn't obey this, e.g. FreeBSD. This patch would fix
this.
Also, according to the PCI spec, mask bit of MSI-X table should be set
after reset.
Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang sh...@linux.intel.com
---
On 12/15/2010 08:05 AM, Hao, Xudong wrote:
Hi, all,
This is KVM test result against kvm.git
d335b156f9fafd177d0606cf845d9a2df2dc5431, and qemu-kvm.git
cb1983b8809d0e06a97384a40bad1194a32fc814.
Currently qemu-kvm build fail on RHEL5 with a undeclared
PCI_PM_CTRL_NO_SOFT_RST error. I saw there
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/15/2010 08:05 AM, Hao, Xudong wrote:
Hi, all,
This is KVM test result against kvm.git
d335b156f9fafd177d0606cf845d9a2df2dc5431, and qemu-kvm.git
cb1983b8809d0e06a97384a40bad1194a32fc814.
Currently qemu-kvm build fail on RHEL5 with a undeclared
On 12/15/2010 08:00 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Looks like a GUI feature to me,
Really? Can't see how you can build NMI to all CPUs from NMI this
CPU. Or am I misunderstanding you?
I guess so. Avi referred to 'nmi button on many machines', I assumed he
meant a virtual machine GUI,
On 12/14/2010 11:57 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
userspace may check this extension in runtime.
Applied, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On 12/15/2010 06:43 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
From: Takuya Yoshikawayoshikawa.tak...@oss.ntt.co.jp
Move slots_lock aquisition from kvm_ioapic_init() and kvm_create_pic()
to their caller.
As a result, x86's KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP is now covered by a unified slots_lock
section, including
On 12/15/2010 06:41 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
From: Takuya Yoshikawayoshikawa.tak...@oss.ntt.co.jp
In KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP, kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev() is called without taking
slots_lock in the error handling path.
Thanks, applied.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:37:41PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/11/28 Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:50PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Record ioport event to replay it upon failover.
(2010/12/16 18:11), Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/15/2010 06:43 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
From: Takuya Yoshikawayoshikawa.tak...@oss.ntt.co.jp
Move slots_lock aquisition from kvm_ioapic_init() and kvm_create_pic()
to their caller.
As a result, x86's KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP is now covered by a unified
On 12/16/2010 11:29 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
and here, the reader might wonder why we don't take slots_lock, which
protects io_bus.
Maybe we ought to move slots_lock acquisition to
kvm_io_bus_register() and friends.
So it will move the lock acquisition to the opposite ( callee ) side
On 12/12/2010 11:23 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/10/2010 07:18 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Looks like this is the appropriate fix:
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_CLOCK
WARN_ON(kvm_register_clock(primary cpu clock));
#endif
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:45:09 +0100
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:18:32 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
[...]
I'd like to see cpu-index made
(2010/12/16 18:34), Avi Kivity wrote:
Maybe we ought to move slots_lock acquisition to kvm_io_bus_register() and
friends.
So it will move the lock acquisition to the opposite ( callee ) side than mine.
At first, I tried to do that, but there are so many ...
Anyway, your suggestion seems to
2010/12/16 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:37:41PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/11/28 Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:50PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Record
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:36:16PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/12/3 Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
2010/12/2 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:03:43PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Sun,
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:50:04PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/12/16 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:37:41PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/11/28 Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On
On 12/16/2010 11:47 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
They're under srcu now, the comments are outdated.
We used to have slots_lock be a rwsem, taken for read or write as
necessary. Now we use srcu for read, and the slots_lock mutex +
synchronize_srcu for write.
Ah, would you mind updating the
On 12/13/2010 01:20 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2010/12/13 2:47), Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/12/2010 07:43 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:42:06PM +0200, Avi Kivity escreveu:
On 12/12/2010 07:36 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Sun, Dec 12, 2010
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:32:12 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/15/2010 08:05 AM, Hao, Xudong wrote:
Hi, all,
This is KVM test result against kvm.git
d335b156f9fafd177d0606cf845d9a2df2dc5431, and qemu-kvm.git
cb1983b8809d0e06a97384a40bad1194a32fc814.
Currently qemu-kvm
On 12/16/2010 12:43 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:32:12 +0200
Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/15/2010 08:05 AM, Hao, Xudong wrote:
Hi, all,
This is KVM test result against kvm.git
d335b156f9fafd177d0606cf845d9a2df2dc5431, and qemu-kvm.git
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:03:38 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/15/2010 08:00 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Looks like a GUI feature to me,
Really? Can't see how you can build NMI to all CPUs from NMI this
CPU. Or am I misunderstanding you?
I guess so. Avi
On 12/16/2010 12:48 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Ok, I didn't know that, but I had another idea: the command could accept
either a single cpu index or a list:
{ execute: inject-nmi, arguments: { cpus: 2 } }
{ execute: inject-nmi, arguments: { cpus: [1, 2, 3, 4] } }
This has the feature
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:51:14 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/16/2010 12:48 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Ok, I didn't know that, but I had another idea: the command could accept
either a single cpu index or a list:
{ execute: inject-nmi, arguments: { cpus: 2 } }
{
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:03:38 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/15/2010 08:00 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Looks like a GUI feature to me,
Really? Can't see how you can build NMI to all CPUs from NMI this
CPU. Or
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/10/2010 03:51 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Newer SVM implementations provide the GPR number in the VMCB, so
that the emulation path is no longer necesarry to handle debug
register access intercepts. Implement the handling in svm.c and
use it when the info is provided.
+
+
On 12/16/2010 02:07 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/10/2010 03:51 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Newer SVM implementations provide the GPR number in the VMCB, so
that the emulation path is no longer necesarry to handle debug
register access intercepts. Implement the handling in
On 12/16/2010 01:47 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
This has the feature of injecting the nmi in just some cpus, although I'm
not sure this is going to be desired/useful.
Use case for NMI-ing a subset of the CPUs?
Heck, use case for anything else but NMI all?
Exactly.
--
error compiling
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
One day I'll write Documentation/kvm/locking.txt, so it could get
outdated as well.
I seemed to be in EOY(End Of Year) mode.
I remember why I could not move slots_lock acquisition to
kvm_io_bus_[un]register().
The locking order constraint forced me to
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:08 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/16/2010 01:47 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
This has the feature of injecting the nmi in just some cpus, although I'm
not sure this is going to be desired/useful.
Use case for NMI-ing a subset of the CPUs?
On 12/16/2010 03:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:08 +0200
Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/16/2010 01:47 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
This has the feature of injecting the nmi in just some cpus, although
I'm
not sure this is going to be
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
+ if (old_action (old_action-flags IRQF_ADAPTIVE)
+ !(desc-irq_data.drv_status IRQS_SHARED)) {
+ /*
+ * Signal the old handler that is has to switch to shareable
+ * handling mode. Disable the line to
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:11:50 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/16/2010 03:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:08 +0200
Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/16/2010 01:47 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
This has the feature of injecting
Based on a patch from Thomas Meyer.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index e3abd84..b989e1f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
(2010/12/16 19:20), Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:20 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2010/12/13 2:47), Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/12/2010 07:43 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:42:06PM +0200, Avi Kivity escreveu:
On 12/12/2010 07:36 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho
2010/12/16 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:36:16PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/12/3 Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
2010/12/2 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:03:43PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/11/28
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:28:46PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/12/16 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:36:16PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/12/3 Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
2010/12/2 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Wed,
* Sigio console timeout.
* Repair Multiopen test.
* Cleanup function try repair ports. Virtual machine
is restarted if something goes wrong. After crash any
part of test summarize output is written to logs.
Remove debug version of summarize output because
there are to much unnecessary information.
* Sigio console timeout.
* Repair Multiopen test.
* Cleanup function try repair ports. Virtual machine
is restarted if something goes wrong. After crash any
part of test summarize output is written to logs.
Remove debug version of summarize output because
there are to much unnecessary information.
2010/12/16 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:28:46PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/12/16 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:36:16PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/12/3 Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
quote who=Kenni Lund
2010/12/14 Erik Brakkee e...@brakkee.org:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:55:04PM +0100, Kenni Lund wrote:
2010/12/14 Erik Brakkeee...@brakkee.org:
From: Kenni Lundke...@kelu.dk
2010/12/14 Erik Brakkeee...@brakkee.org:
From: Kenni
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/12/16 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:37:41PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
2010/11/28 Yoshiaki Tamura tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp:
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin
On 12/14/2010 01:08 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:46 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index dc91a4d..6399641 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -5166,6 +5166,46 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_getaffinity, pid_t, pid,
Am 16.12.2010 14:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
+if (old_action (old_action-flags IRQF_ADAPTIVE)
+!(desc-irq_data.drv_status IRQS_SHARED)) {
+/*
+ * Signal the old handler that is has to switch to shareable
+
eom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Erik Brakkee wrote:
quote who=Kenni Lund
2010/12/14 Erik Brakkeee...@brakkee.org:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:55:04PM +0100, Kenni Lund wrote:
2010/12/14 Erik Brakkeee...@brakkee.org:
From: Kenni Lundke...@kelu.dk
2010/12/14
Thanks for the reply and it makes a lot of sense.
I am not seeing any EPT tables being zapped after the guest has fully started
up although the value of EPTP continuously changes as the guest is running.
From: Avi Kivity [...@redhat.com]
Sent: Sunday,
On 12/16/2010 09:17 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:11:50 +0200
Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
Why have an argument at all? Always nmi to all cpus.
I think Avi's suggest is better, and I will use
inject-nmi (without cpu-index argument) to send NMI to all cpus,
like
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:49 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 12/14/2010 01:08 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(yield_to);
That part looks ok, except for the yield cross cpu bit. Trying to yield
a resource you don't have doesn't make much sense to me.
The current task just
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 07:57 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 14:49 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
+static void yield_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+struct sched_entity *se =p-se;
+struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+u64
49 matches
Mail list logo
