Manish Regmi wrote:
hi,
I am trying to use kvmtrace but it looks like its no longer used. in
Right, kernel support was removed a few releases ago. I think it's time
to drop that tool from the qemu-kvm package.
kvm_main.c it is returning -EOPNOTSUP.
kvmtrace -V -D test -o mykvmtest
does
On 04/14/2010 06:24 AM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Spin loops need to be addressed first, they are known to kill
performance in overcommit situations.
Even in overcommit case, if vcpu threads of one qemu are not
scheduled or pulled to the same logical processor, the performance
drop is
Hey,
im from germany and new in kvm. I'll tried the how-to's from your page to
migrate an windows vmware .vmdk to a kvm image. I'll also tried so start the
kvm with kvm -drive file ... but that also wont work. I'll hope you could get
me an answer how to migrate my vmware .vmdk to an working
On 04/14/2030 12:05 PM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
Here is the new patch of V3 against tip/master of April 13th
if anyone wants to try it.
Thanks for persisting despite the flames.
Can you please separate arch/x86/kvm part of the patch? That will make
for easier reviewing, and will need to
(Please keep the list on CC:!)
Wagner, Kai wrote:
Hey,
no i used the real .vmdk. I'll tried to convert a linux
image from vmware to windows and that worked fine with
kvm convert But if i do the same with a windows .vmdk
i cant boot this image. It always came a bluescreen which
told
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 17:20:15 Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2030 12:05 PM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
Here is the new patch of V3 against tip/master of April 13th
if anyone wants to try it.
Thanks for persisting despite the flames.
Can you please separate arch/x86/kvm part of the patch?
On 04/14/2010 12:43 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 17:20:15 Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2030 12:05 PM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
Here is the new patch of V3 against tip/master of April 13th
if anyone wants to try it.
Thanks for persisting despite the flames.
Can
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 17:57:50 Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2010 12:43 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 17:20:15 Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2030 12:05 PM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
Here is the new patch of V3 against tip/master of April 13th
if anyone wants to try it.
On 04/14/2010 01:14 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
I wouldn't like to depend on model specific behaviour.
One option is to read all the information synchronously and store it in
a per-cpu area with atomic instructions, then queue the NMI. Another
option is to have another callback which tells us that
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 18:33:37 Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2010 01:27 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
Yes, interesting to see what the latency is. If it's reasonably short
(and I expect it will be so), we can do the busy wait solution.
If we have an NMI counter somewhere, we can simply wait
* Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/14/2030 12:05 PM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
Here is the new patch of V3 against tip/master of April 13th
if anyone wants to try it.
Thanks for persisting despite the flames.
Can you please separate arch/x86/kvm part of the patch? That will make
On 04/14/2010 01:43 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Thanks for persisting despite the flames.
Can you please separate arch/x86/kvm part of the patch? That will make for
easier reviewing, and will need to go through separate trees.
Once it gets into a state that it can be applied could you
When a fault triggers a task switch, the error code, if it exists, has
to be pushed on the new task's stack. Implement the missing bits.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |3 ++-
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h|3 ++-
On 04/14/2010 03:11 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
When a fault triggers a task switch, the error code, if it exists, has
to be pushed on the new task's stack. Implement the missing bits.
@@ -2416,12 +2417,23 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct
x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2010 03:11 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
When a fault triggers a task switch, the error code, if it exists, has
to be pushed on the new task's stack. Implement the missing bits.
@@ -2416,12 +2417,23 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct
x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:11:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
- struct x86_emulate_ops *ops,
- u16 tss_selector, int reason)
+struct
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2010 03:11 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
When a fault triggers a task switch, the error code, if it exists, has
to be pushed on the new task's stack. Implement the missing bits.
@@ -2416,12 +2417,23 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of Andre Przywara
Sent: Mittwoch, 14. April 2010 11:35
To: Wagner, Kai
Cc: KVM list
Subject: Re: AW: Kvm migration problem
(Please keep the list on CC:!)
Wagner, Kai wrote:
Hey,
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:11:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
-struct x86_emulate_ops *ops,
-u16 tss_selector, int reason)
+
On 04/14/2010 03:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The TSS descriptor (gate doesn't have a size). But isn't it possible to
have a 32-bit TSS with a 16-bit CS/SS?
Might be possible, but will cause troubles as the spec says:
The error code is pushed on the stack as a doubleword or word
On 04/14/2010 04:07 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2010 03:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The TSS descriptor (gate doesn't have a size). But isn't it
possible to
have a 32-bit TSS with a 16-bit CS/SS?
Might be possible, but will cause troubles as the spec says:
The error code is pushed on the
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2010 03:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
The TSS descriptor (gate doesn't have a size). But isn't it possible to
have a 32-bit TSS with a 16-bit CS/SS?
Might be possible, but will cause troubles as the spec says:
The error code is pushed on the stack as a
Stop the switch immediately if task_switch_16/32 returned an error. Only
if that step succeeded, the switch should actually take place and update
any register states.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0
When a fault triggers a task switch, the error code, if existent, has to
be pushed on the new task's stack. Implement the missing bits.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
Changes in v2:
- push writeback into emulator_task_switch
- refactored over Terminate early if
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Amos Kong ak...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Lucas,
When I execute unattended_install testcases on RHEL-5.5, it always fail when
using rhel3.9-32 guest.
I found it blocked after packages installation. Is it related that rhel39-32
guest don't support acpi ?
I've
This fixes make ARCH=i386 of the KVM micro tests on x86-64 hosts.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
kvm/user/config-x86-common.mak |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kvm/user/config-x86-common.mak b/kvm/user/config-x86-common.mak
index
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:00:18PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:11:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
- struct x86_emulate_ops *ops,
-
This implements a basic task switch test for 32-bit targets. It
specifically stresses the case that a fault with attached error code
triggers the switch via a task gate.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
Gleb, you might want to have a look at this test. When using it with my
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:12:46PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This implements a basic task switch test for 32-bit targets. It
specifically stresses the case that a fault with attached error code
triggers the switch via a task gate.
How do you compile this? I was sure kvm test suit is broken for
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:12:46PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This implements a basic task switch test for 32-bit targets. It
specifically stresses the case that a fault with attached error code
triggers the switch via a task gate.
How do you compile this? I was sure kvm
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:41:15PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:12:46PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This implements a basic task switch test for 32-bit targets. It
specifically stresses the case that a fault with attached error code
triggers the
On Friday 09 April 2010, xiaohui@intel.com wrote:
From: Xin Xiaohui xiaohui@intel.com
Add a device to utilize the vhost-net backend driver for
copy-less data transfer between guest FE and host NIC.
It pins the guest user space to the host memory and
provides proto_ops as
When a fault triggers a task switch, the error code, if existent, has to
be pushed on the new task's stack. Implement the missing bits.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
This is a backport of the proposed fix for master. It applies at least
down to 2.6.32 and should be
Just a follow up on this. The hypervisor had ACPI / ACPI PM clocksource
support disabled, as did the guest. This problem occurred with both tsc
and jiffies clock sources on the hypervisor.
With ACPI enabled and ACPI PM enabled, the clocksources on the
hypervisor became hpt and acpi_pm. The
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 03:25:00PM +0800, xiaohui@intel.com wrote:
The idea is simple, just to pin the guest VM user space and then
let host NIC driver has the chance to directly DMA to it.
The patches are based on vhost-net backend driver. We add a device
which provides proto_ops as
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:55:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2010, xiaohui@intel.com wrote:
From: Xin Xiaohui xiaohui@intel.com
Add a device to utilize the vhost-net backend driver for
copy-less data transfer between guest FE and host NIC.
It pins the guest
On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:55:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2010, xiaohui@intel.com wrote:
From: Xin Xiaohui xiaohui@intel.com
It seems that you are duplicating a lot of functionality that
is already in
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:57:54PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:55:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 09 April 2010, xiaohui@intel.com wrote:
From: Xin Xiaohui xiaohui@intel.com
It seems
There is no real distinction between glevels=3 and glevels=4; both have
exactly the same format and the code is treated exactly the same way. Drop
role.glevels and replace is with role.cr4_pae (which is meaningful). This
simplifies the code a bit.
As a side effect, it allows sharing shadow page
On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
qemu needs the ability to inject raw packets into device
from userspace, bypassing vhost/virtio (for live migration).
Ok, but since there is only a write callback and no read, it won't
actually be able to do this with the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:23:38AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
I'd prefer to not touch it.
This patch avoids walk all parents and i think this overload is really
unnecessary.
It has other tricks in this codepath but i not noticed? :-)
My point is that
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:14:29AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 09:34:14AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
@@ -1483,8 +1483,8 @@ static int mmu_zap_unsync_children(struct kvm *kvm,
On 04/14/2010 07:20 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
There is no real distinction between glevels=3 and glevels=4; both have
exactly the same format and the code is treated exactly the same way. Drop
role.glevels and replace is with role.cr4_pae (which is meaningful). This
simplifies the code a bit.
As
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:12:46PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gleb, you might want to have a look at this test. When using it with my
2.6.34 queue (or below or with QEMU), I get the following, expected
output:
fault at 8:4002ef, prev task 18, error code 1234
post fault
When using it with
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 05:26:47PM +0300, Naphtali Sprei wrote:
use correct 64 bit mode inline assembly constraints
use a canonical form address when writing to the MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE MSR
Signed-off-by: Naphtali Sprei nsp...@redhat.com
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:21:56AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
May be I am missing something here, but it seams we can call
kvm_mmu_pte_write() directly from emulator_cmpxchg_emulated()
instead of passing mmu_only down to emulator_write_emulated_onepage()
and call it there.
Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:47:24PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
This is based on my last patch:
fix the handling of dirty bitmaps to avoid overflows
Sorry, this resulted in reverting part of that.
===
This patch limits the number of pages per memory slot to make
us free from extra
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:32:12PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2010 07:20 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
There is no real distinction between glevels=3 and glevels=4; both have
exactly the same format and the code is treated exactly the same way. Drop
role.glevels and replace is with
Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:12:46PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gleb, you might want to have a look at this test. When using it with my
2.6.34 queue (or below or with QEMU), I get the following, expected
output:
fault at 8:4002ef, prev task 18, error code 1234
post fault
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:35:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
qemu needs the ability to inject raw packets into device
from userspace, bypassing vhost/virtio (for live migration).
Ok, but since there is only a write
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 22:31:42 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:35:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
qemu needs the ability to inject raw packets into device
from userspace, bypassing vhost/virtio (for
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:39:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 22:31:42 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:35:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
qemu needs the ability to inject raw
Bugs item #2976863, was opened at 2010-03-26 02:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mtosatti
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2976863group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
On Wednesday 14 April 2010 22:40:03 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:39:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Well, if the guest not only wants to send data but also receive
frames coming from other machines, they need to get from the kernel
into qemu, and the only way I can
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/08/2010 01:52 AM, Cam Macdonell wrote:
Support an inter-vm shared memory device that maps a shared-memory object
as a
PCI device in the guest. This patch also supports interrupts between
guest by
communicating over a
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Feng Yang fy...@redhat.com wrote:
If set remove_image to yes, the image will be removed before
check_image.py is executed as post command. But check_img.py
still try to check the removed image When it is running.
This patch update check_image.py and let it do
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:03 AM, pradeep psuri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
sudhir kumar wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:40 PM, pradeep psuri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Lucas
Thanks for your comments.
Please find the patch, with suggested changes.
Thanks
Pradeep
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:20 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/14/2030 12:05 PM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
Here is the new patch of V3 against tip/master of April 13th
if anyone wants to try it.
Thanks for persisting despite the flames.
Can you please separate arch/x86/kvm part of the
- Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
To: Feng Yang fy...@redhat.com
Cc: autot...@test.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:05:41 AM GMT +08:00 Beijing / Chongqing /
Hong Kong / Urumqi
Subject: Re:
59 matches
Mail list logo
