Asynchronous interruption of a compute-intensive guest

2011-04-12 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
. Regards, T. -- Tommaso Cucinotta, Computer Engineering PhD, Researcher ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy Tel +39 050 882 024, Fax +39 050 882 003 http://retis.sssup.it/people/tommaso -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function]

2011-01-04 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
, I'm not saying it is sufficient for -- Tommaso Cucinotta, Computer Engineering PhD, Researcher ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy Tel +39 050 882 024, Fax +39 050 882 003 http://retis.sssup.it/people/tommaso -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function]

2011-01-04 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Il 05/01/2011 00:38, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto: Of course, don't misunderstand me: this is a necessary condition for a stable performance of KVM VMs, I'm not saying it is sufficient for ... it. Please, comment on this (reply to all, please, I'm not following LKML). Thanks, Tommaso