Re: [v2] KVM: VMX: Fix commit which broke PML

On 05/11/2015 03:04, Kai Huang wrote: > > Thanks for applying! I am really sorry that I forgot to delete the line > that clears SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML bit in vmx_disable_pml, which is > renamed to vmx_destroy_pml_buffer now. > It won't impact functionality but to make the function consistent,

Re: [v2] KVM: VMX: Fix commit which broke PML

Hi Paolo, Thanks for applying! I am really sorry that I forgot to delete the line that clears SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML bit in vmx_disable_pml, which is renamed to vmx_destroy_pml_buffer now. It won't impact functionality but to make the function consistent, would you also do below? Sorry for

Re: [v2] KVM: VMX: Fix commit which broke PML

On 04/11/2015 06:46, Kai Huang wrote: > I found PML was broken since below commit: > > commit feda805fe7c4ed9cf78158e73b1218752e3b4314 > Author: Xiao Guangrong > Date: Wed Sep 9 14:05:55 2015 +0800 > > KVM: VMX: unify SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL update > > Unify

[RESEND PATCH v2] KVM: VMX: Fix commit which broke PML

I found PML was broken since below commit: commit feda805fe7c4ed9cf78158e73b1218752e3b4314 Author: Xiao Guangrong Date: Wed Sep 9 14:05:55 2015 +0800 KVM: VMX: unify SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL update Unify the update in vmx_cpuid_update() Signed

[v2] KVM: VMX: Fix commit which broke PML

I found PML was broken since below commit: commit feda805fe7c4ed9cf78158e73b1218752e3b4314 Author: Xiao Guangrong Date: Wed Sep 9 14:05:55 2015 +0800 KVM: VMX: unify SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL update Unify the update in vmx_cpuid_update() Signed