Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function]

2011-01-06 Thread Hillf Danton
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote: On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:38 +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Il 04/01/2011 19:15, Dario Faggioli ha scritto: Forwarded Message From: Peter Zijlstraa.p.zijls...@chello.nl To: Rik van

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function]

2011-01-05 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:38 +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Il 04/01/2011 19:15, Dario Faggioli ha scritto: Forwarded Message From: Peter Zijlstraa.p.zijls...@chello.nl To: Rik van Rielr...@redhat.com Cc: Hillf Dantondhi...@gmail.com,kvm@vger.kernel.org,

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function]

2011-01-04 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Il 04/01/2011 19:15, Dario Faggioli ha scritto: Forwarded Message From: Peter Zijlstraa.p.zijls...@chello.nl To: Rik van Rielr...@redhat.com Cc: Hillf Dantondhi...@gmail.com,kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivitia...@redhat.com, Srivatsa

Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function]

2011-01-04 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Il 05/01/2011 00:38, Tommaso Cucinotta ha scritto: Of course, don't misunderstand me: this is a necessary condition for a stable performance of KVM VMs, I'm not saying it is sufficient for ... it. Please, comment on this (reply to all, please, I'm not following LKML). Thanks, Tommaso --