On 20/11/2014 23:22, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'll be able to run some tests in about 2 to 3 hours after I finish this
document. Let me know what I should look at? on a side note, a pointer
to an automated install process would be wonderful.
GNOME Boxes can pretty much automate the install
On 11/21/2014 09:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 20/11/2014 23:22, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'll be able to run some tests in about 2 to 3 hours after I finish this
document. Let me know what I should look at? on a side note, a pointer
to an automated install process would be wonderful.
On 21/11/2014 17:52, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
4384 libvirt+ 20 0 2825112 2.058g 9960 R 109.1 26.6 12:47.73
qemu-system-x86
next report after updates install
btw, would you like a better UI design for a management tool? I have
some ideas but would need someone with hands to put
On 11/21/2014 11:52 AM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
4384 libvirt+ 20 0 2825112 2.058g 9960 R 109.1 26.6 12:47.73
qemu-system-x86
next report after updates install
next puzzle. updates are not working
using bridged to eth0
using virt io driver (checked install on windows)
browser works
a little more info
On 11/21/2014 01:24 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
next puzzle. updates are not working
using bridged to eth0
using virt io driver (checked install on windows)
browser works in vm (quite well in fact)
watching output of tcpdump
and there is no apparent traffic for updates.
On 11/18/2014 9:57 AM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
That's great to know. I will spin up a version of Windows 7 and give
it a try given that I'm not looking at it, I can strip it down to the
barest user interface elements and improve performance significantly.
I tried it and it took me
On 20/11/2014 17:28, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'm accustomed to lesser performance on virtual machines. That's the
hazard of a running on old and slow laptop (dell e6400 (2.2ghz core
duo, 8gb ram)[1]) but even virtual box is not this slow. So what am I
doing wrong? It would be nice to use
On 11/20/2014 4:48 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 20/11/2014 17:28, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'm accustomed to lesser performance on virtual machines. That's the
hazard of a running on old and slow laptop (dell e6400 (2.2ghz core
duo, 8gb ram)[1]) but even virtual box is not this slow. So what
On 18/11/2014 07:48, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'm trying to figure out ways of making it possible to drive Linux from
Windows speech recognition (NaturallySpeaking). The goal is a system
where Windows runs in a virtual machine (Linux host), audio is passed
through from a USB headset to the
Hi,
On 11/18/2014 02:50 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 18/11/2014 07:48, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'm trying to figure out ways of making it possible to drive Linux from
Windows speech recognition (NaturallySpeaking). The goal is a system
where Windows runs in a virtual machine (Linux
On 11/18/2014 8:50 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I'm adding two people who might know.
Do you have any idea what the magic to pipe data back to the Linux
host should look like? Does a normal serial port (COM1 for Windows,
/dev/ttyS0 for Linux) work?
The fine magic comes in three forms.
On 11/18/2014 8:53 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
kvm's usb pass-through should be able to handle this without any issues
(other then some latency), it uses special buffering for isochronous
usb packets, which should take care of usb audio working.
I've never tested audio recording, but audio
this is a rather different use case than what you've been thinking of
for KVM. It could mean significant improvement of the quality of life of
disabled programs like myself. It's difficult to convey what it's like
to try to use computers with speech recognition for something other than
writing
13 matches
Mail list logo
