Hi Avi,
So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well? But even so, I
am still thinking we have to come out a solution for checking IA64 code into
existing KVM upstream tree , because KVM infrastructure in mainline Linux may
been a long way to go. Moreover, we also have no
Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Hey,
I just noticed that is it nmot possible to install Windows 2003 Serevr
SMP guests (using: -smp 2 -boot d -m 2048 -net nic,model=rtl8139 -no-acpi OR
without -no-acpi).
The crash can be erproduced, when installing Windows using -smp 2 OR
when installing a
Bugs item #1804408, was opened at 2007-09-28 16:42
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=1804408group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bugs item #1802227, was opened at 2007-09-25 23:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item
Submitter You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=18
02227group_id=180599
Please note that this
BTW, I downloaded KVM-36 with REHL5U 32e guest, reboot doesn't work
either. But if I use no-kvm option, it can.
So I would like to know which release is the latest known working
tree for reboot.
More update:
Using today's master, without any patch, reboot works!!!
It could
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi Avi,
Sound good! But what can we do before the merge? You know, we have to
spend much effort maintaining our patches with sync with upstream tree. Do
you have an interim solution or proposal for merging IA64 code? Thanks.
Xiantao
The merge is due in a
Dong, Eddie wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Dong, Eddie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to implement the guest reboot support, but I found there is an
stranger #PF VM Exit in guest real mode cs:ip=f000:1 which is
problemtic and current shadow won;t handle. I then try to
Dong, Eddie wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c index
cecdb1b..0ebae4c 100644 --- a/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c +++
b/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -1080,14 +1080,19 @@ static int
emulator_read_emulated(unsigned long addr, memcpy(val,
vcpu-mmio_data, bytes);
Mining Sector --- Delta Mining UPDATE
HOT SECTOR: Additional information on (O_T_C: D M X C) D M X C is expected to
arrive soon.
For those of you who currently own this company this will be great news.
For those that don't currently own this company, you need to get in on this now.
The company
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now
Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable performance
on KVM with Open GFW. But you know, the current KVM only considers x86
platform, and is short of cross-architecture framework.
Avi Kivity wrote:
In theory yes. But we didn't observe this so far. Xen with this
feature with same assumption works for quit a long time.
Also given that we are using global shadow page table, so probably
we have to take this assumption :-)
We can workaround this by disabling the
Dong, Eddie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bugs item #1802227, was opened at 2007-09-25 23:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item
Submitter You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=18
02227group_id=180599
Hey,
I just noticed that is it nmot possible to install Windows 2003 Serevr SMP
guests (using: -smp 2 -boot d -m 2048 -net nic,model=rtl8139 -no-acpi OR
without -no-acpi).
The crash can be erproduced, when installing Windows using -smp 2 OR when
installing a WIndows Guest with -smp 1 and
Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Hey,
I just noticed that is it nmot possible to install Windows 2003 Serevr SMP
guests (using: -smp 2 -boot d -m 2048 -net nic,model=rtl8139 -no-acpi OR
without -no-acpi).
The crash can be erproduced, when installing Windows using -smp 2 OR when
installing a WIndows
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi Avi,
So you mean IA64 can adopt the similar method as well?
What method do you mean exactly?
But even so, I am still thinking we have to come out a solution for checking
IA64 code into existing KVM upstream tree , because KVM infrastructure in
mainline
* Anthony Liguori [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-24 16:39]:
Ryan Harper wrote:
* Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-24 02:57]:
Ryan Harper wrote:
I've run into a nasty bug while trying to install a Linux guest using
VMware Server inside a kvm guest (full dmesg attached and recreate
Avi Kivity wrote:
Dong, Eddie wrote:
First, I doubt that memory slot count will really affect performance.
The memory slot structure is small and it is likely that all slots
will be kept in cache at all times. Walking all slots should take
a lot less
time than a vmexit, even if there are
17 matches
Mail list logo
