On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 01:01 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 14:11 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 01:19 +, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:56:16 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Eventually I'd like to see the code in arc
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>>> This patch corrects some errors appearing when we have an emulation
>>> failure
>>> on an operation using REP prefix.
>>>
>>> When x86_emulate_insn() fails, saving EIP and ECX is not enough as
>>> emulation
>>> shou
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> This patch corrects some errors appearing when we have an emulation failure
> on an operation using REP prefix.
>
> When x86_emulate_insn() fails, saving EIP and ECX is not enough as emulation
> should have modified other registers like RSI or RDI. Moreover, the emulation
>
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 14:11 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 01:19 +, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:56:16 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >
> > > Eventually I'd like to see the code in arch/*/kvm. That's probably not
> > > easily doable right now because
Jerone Young wrote:
> This is the first of many patches to begin to make kvm source a lot
> better for compiling for other architecture support (that is not x86 or
> x86-64).
>
> This patch makes it possible so that someone on an x86 machine can cross
> compile for an x86-64 machine and vice versa.
This was committed in 1d55c096cce99f069d9ac8e3b2195d45adce9549 on Feb 7,
and clearly never actually compiled.
---
kernel/external-module-compat.h |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/external-module-compat.h b/kernel/external-module-compat.h
index 2e
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 01:19 +, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:56:16 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > Eventually I'd like to see the code in arch/*/kvm. That's probably not
> > easily doable right now because modules cannot span directories, but
> > once that's solved, we'l
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:56:16 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> Eventually I'd like to see the code in arch/*/kvm. That's probably not
> easily doable right now because modules cannot span directories, but
> once that's solved, we'll do that as this is most consistent with the
> rest of the kernel.
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Cam Macdonell wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Cameron Macdonell wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand guest virtualization at the lower levels.
I have a somewhat basic question: How does KVM virtualize an
int80 instruction from a guest? A
Cam Macdonell wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Cameron Macdonell wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to understand guest virtualization at the lower levels.
>>> I have a somewhat basic question: How does KVM virtualize an
>>> int80 instruction from a guest? A pointer to an answer is just as
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Cameron Macdonell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to understand guest virtualization at the lower levels. I
>> have a somewhat basic question: How does KVM virtualize an int80
>> instruction from a guest? A pointer to an answer is just as good as
>> an answer itself
This is the first of many patches to begin to make kvm source a lot
better for compiling for other architecture support (that is not x86 or
x86-64).
This patch makes it possible so that someone on an x86 machine can cross
compile for an x86-64 machine and vice versa. So now you will have
config-$(
Miguel Araujo wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> After solving my problems installing OpenBSD 4.1 in KVM, I tried to
> install Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn. The problem is that it gets stuck in a
> black screen without having said anything at all. After some testing
> with other isos I thought it could be relat
hi,
after i try to merge centos and fedora kvm-36 spec files and patches
(ethernet qemu fix etc) and start the guests on the new kvm host the
guest install. the only thing what i got in qemu vnc window:
serial0 console
so the guest not even start to boot.
anybody has any tip?
may be the bios update
Hello all,
After solving my problems installing OpenBSD 4.1 in KVM, I tried to
install Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn. The problem is that it gets stuck in a
black screen without having said anything at all. After some testing
with other isos I thought it could be related to the graphical
bootloader
Tobias Brink escribió:
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tobias Brink wrote:
I have a probably similar problem with OpenBSD 4.1 and kvm-37 and
kvm-39 (didn't have time to test any further versions). Kernel is
2.6.22-gentoo-r5 and processor is Intel Core2 Quad. I use the modules
Bugs item #1805519, was opened at 2007-10-01 11:31
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1805519&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
This patch corrects some errors appearing when we have an emulation failure
on an operation using REP prefix.
When x86_emulate_insn() fails, saving EIP and ECX is not enough as emulation
should have modified other registers like RSI or RDI. Moreover, the emulation
can fail on the writeback, and in
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> This patch corrects some errors appearing when we have an emulation
>> failure
>> on an operation using REP prefix.
>>
>> When x86_emulate_insn() fails, saving EIP and ECX is not enough as
>> emulation
>> should have modified other registers like RSI or
19 matches
Mail list logo
