I am trying to follow qemu + QNX instructions below, but using qemu-kvm. I
get
exception 14 (0)
during boot (while printing dots, and has not got to the banner messages
yet.
I am using Fedora 8 + kvm61. If I disable kvm (-no-kvm) things run fine
just as in standard qemu.
However other Linux b
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:38:59PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
> > Izik Eidus wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 12:58 +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
> >>> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> This is today's KVM test result against KVM62-RC2.
>
> Two
On Feb 27, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> mark processors as present through the _STA method
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>> bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl | 18 ++
>> 1 files changed, 18 in
On Feb 26, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> mark processors as present through the _STA method
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl | 18 ++
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
Hi,
> - add file:// migration protocol (Uri Lublin)
commit 70d2a9dc3594446f3ad66b32abc94c08b74118d4
Author: Uri Lublin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Feb 21 15:00:50 2008 +0200
kvm: qemu: migration: added file:// migration protocol
Instead of writing into a file with fork+exec, jus
Antoine Martin wrote:
> Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 06:07:19PM +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> If that doesn't work, maybe you can upload an image
> for me to debug.
http://194.145.196.85/kvm/vmlinuz-2.6.24-rc7.bz2
>>> Any luck? Any other ideas for
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
bios/rombios32.c | 55 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bios/rombios32.c b/bios/rombios32.c
index f2db740..77e71ac 100755
--- a/bios/rombios32.c
+++ b/bios/r
actually grab and return data, instead of just being two
bogus functions.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
qemu/hw/acpi.c | 36
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu/hw/acpi.c b/qemu/hw/acpi.c
index 119b59a.
spin up a new cpu thread if not yet running.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
qemu/hw/acpi.c | 16
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu/hw/acpi.c b/qemu/hw/acpi.c
index 5a6d1a8..e44c8b5 100644
--- a/qemu/hw/acpi.c
+++ b/qemu/h
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl | 154 +++-
1 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl b/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
index 194a051..7dffb6d 100755
--- a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
+++
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
qemu/qemu-kvm.c |9 +++--
qemu/qemu-kvm.h |1 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
index ffc59d5..59fe9df 100644
--- a/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -351,6 +351
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
qemu/hw/acpi.c | 42 ++
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu/hw/acpi.c b/qemu/hw/acpi.c
index 7340f15..5a6d1a8 100644
--- a/qemu/hw/acpi.c
+++ b/qemu/hw/acpi.c
@@ -534,10
Register the pios, and grab cpu_model for future usage.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
qemu/hw/acpi.c | 34 ++
qemu/hw/pc.c |1 +
qemu/sysemu.h |1 +
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu/hw/acpi.c b
This corresponds to the cpu hotplug functionality
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl | 114
1 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl b/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
index 1db
This patch wraps up the piece of code in hw/pc.c that
actually allocates and initializates a cpu. After that,
plan is to be able to start it later on.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
qemu/hw/pc.c | 40 +++-
qemu/hw/pc.h |1 +
2 files
provide methods for gpe blk 0, even though they do nothing atm
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl | 51 +++
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl b/bios/acpi-dsdt.ds
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl b/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
index 392d402..1dba157 100755
--- a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
+++ b/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
@@ -27,6 +27,13 @@ Definiti
in this patch, cpu_set is introduced to qemu monitor
semantics is : cpu_set x online|offline.
it will then tell the acpi backend to signal cpu x.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
qemu/hw/acpi.c |4
qemu/monitor.c | 16
qemu/sysemu.h |3 +++
3
mark processors as present through the _STA method
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl | 18 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl b/bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl
index e900795..244e906 100755
--- a/bios/ac
gpe is acessible when its address listed by BIOS is !0.
This patch makes gpe blk 0 available, and 4 bytes in length
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
bios/rombios32.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bios/rombios32.c b/bios/rombios32.c
i
Mark cpus over smp_cpus as present, but disable.
The OS can then recognize it and make room for future hotplug
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
bios/rombios.h |2 ++
bios/rombios32.c | 21 +
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --
Hi,
I'm resending the series with avi's few comments merged, and a couple
of others on my own:
* _STA returns 0xF instead of 0x1. According to the specification, it means
that the device, besides present, is also functional, enabled, and a couple
of other cool things.
* gpe_base and proc_base
Acked-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Avi, please apply.
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://
Bugs item #1902416, was opened at 2008-02-26 10:40
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1902416&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
Pelle wrote:
> I THINK this is due to the fact that kvm-60+ uses a realtek nic as
> default and not the old ne2000.
> You could try specifying -nic,model=ne2k_pci
Yes, this is *part* of the solution. A clean install that was activated
on some old KVM, had some software installed on more recent on
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 11:00 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jerone Young wrote:
> > The top level directory of kvm-userspace is starting to get a little
> > crowded as we start to bring in more external dependencies. Perhaps we
> > can create a folder "tools" and move directories:
> > bios
> > extboot
# HG changeset patch
# User Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Date 1204046245 21600
# Branch merge
# Node ID 1980deb2bddff30c2f798d33937759a7ce91c242
# Parent e1260182b60d6d6716870c3bff82f503fad868fb
Fix PowerPC Qemu CPU initilization when using target-ppc/fake-exec.c
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> In the current inject_page_fault path KVM only checks if there is another PF
> pending and injects a DF then. But it has to check for a pendig DF too to
> detect a shutdown condition in the VCPU. If this is not detected the VCPU goes
> to a PF -> DF -> PF loop when it should t
In the current inject_page_fault path KVM only checks if there is another PF
pending and injects a DF then. But it has to check for a pendig DF too to
detect a shutdown condition in the VCPU. If this is not detected the VCPU goes
to a PF -> DF -> PF loop when it should triple fault. This patch dete
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:02:31PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >In the current inject_page_fault path KVM only checks if there is another PF
> >pending and injects a DF then. But it has to check for a pendig DF too to
> >detect a shutdown condition in the VCPU. If this is not d
Love the new high screen resolution as can now run in full screen mode with
good experience. Great work!
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fixes the longstanding RHEL 5 i386 smp boot problem as well as the
> recent Intel Core regression. Large page support
david ahern wrote:
> Usually within a few hours, sometimes within 30 minutes.
>
> Load averages as computed by sysstat in the nightly sar files:
>
> rxpck/s txpck/s rxbyt/s txbyt/s
> eth0975.18 1188.34 82044.06 171655.38
>
> Interrupts come in at 1830/sec for eth0, 250/sec for
Fixes the longstanding RHEL 5 i386 smp boot problem as well as the
recent Intel Core regression. Large page support improves performance
for dedicated virtualization hosts, while vmware vga and more std-vga
resolutions should improve the home user experience.
Changes from kvm-61:
- fix oops ru
I noted in my original post that if I increase the weight parameter in the
driver to have it pull more packets on each poll before taking it break then it
takes longer to freeze.
I have looked at a newer version of the 8139cp driver. Very few changes to the
poll function; most of them seem to be a
Usually within a few hours, sometimes within 30 minutes.
Load averages as computed by sysstat in the nightly sar files:
rxpck/s txpck/s rxbyt/s txbyt/s
eth0975.18 1188.34 82044.06 171655.38
Interrupts come in at 1830/sec for eth0, 250/sec for the timer and 20/sec or
ide0.
Avi Kivity wrote:
> david ahern wrote:
>> Almost 7 hours and the uniprocessor case is still chugging along.
>>
>>
>
> How long does it usually take to hang?
>
> How do I go about reproducing this? apachebench (host) against httpd
> (guest) doesn't seem to trigger it.
>
ab (on host) against htt
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Izik Eidus wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 12:58 +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
Hi, all,
This is today's KVM test result against KVM62-RC2.
Two old issues fixed:
1. fc5/fc6/rhel5u1 no-acpi up guests can't boot on pae hos
Izik Eidus wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 12:58 +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
>>> Hi, all,
>>>
>>> This is today's KVM test result against KVM62-RC2.
>>>
>>> Two old issues fixed:
>>> 1. fc5/fc6/rhel5u1 no-acpi up guests can't boot on pae host
>>> https://sourceforge.net/tr
Joerg Roedel wrote:
> In the current inject_page_fault path KVM only checks if there is another PF
> pending and injects a DF then. But it has to check for a pendig DF too to
> detect a shutdown condition in the VCPU. If this is not detected the VCPU goes
> to a PF -> DF -> PF loop when it should t
> > That is it. That is all our allowed interaction with the users process.
>
> OK, when you said something along the lines of "the MPT library has
> control of the comm buffer", then I assumed it was an area of virtual
> memory which is set up as part of initialization, rather than during
> runt
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:52:41PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 18:21, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:11:32PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > You are missing one point here. The MPI specifications that have
> > > > been out there for decades do not
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 12:58 +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > This is today's KVM test result against KVM62-RC2.
> >
> > Two old issues fixed:
> > 1. fc5/fc6/rhel5u1 no-acpi up guests can't boot on pae host
> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?fun
Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> This is today's KVM test result against KVM62-RC2.
>
> Two old issues fixed:
> 1. fc5/fc6/rhel5u1 no-acpi up guests can't boot on pae host
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1901208&group_
> id=180599&atid=893831
> 2. Cannot boot 32bit
In the current inject_page_fault path KVM only checks if there is another PF
pending and injects a DF then. But it has to check for a pendig DF too to
detect a shutdown condition in the VCPU. If this is not detected the VCPU goes
to a PF -> DF -> PF loop when it should triple fault. This patch dete
This weekend I was doing some compiling and silimar work on FreeBDS
6.3 running under Fedora 8 using KVM.
The performance overhead compared with running native on the same
machine was very high - from at least 15x to maybe as much as 25x. I
understtod that near-native performance was possible.
As
Dong, Eddie wrote:
>>> I don't know if the patch was still needed now, since it was posted
>>> long ago(I don't know which issue it solved). I'd like to post a
>>> revert patch if necessary.
>>>
>>>
>> I believe the patch is still necessary, since we still need to
>> guarantee that a vcpu's
Yang, Sheng wrote:
>> One new issue:
>> 1. qcow based smp linux guests likely hang
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1901980&group_
>> id=180599&atid=893831
>> We found the issue while booting qcow based rhel5.1 smp guest. It likely
>> hangs at the first booting. If using
> > > > Can you change the spec?
> > >
> > > Not really. It will break all existing codes.
> >
> > I meant as in eg. submit changes to MPI-3
>
> MPI spec tries to be backward compatible. And MPI-2 spec is 10 years
> old, but MPI-1 is still in a wider use. HPC is moving fast in terms of HW
> techno
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 17:20:02 Zhao, Yunfeng wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> This is today's KVM test result against KVM62-RC2.
>
> Two old issues fixed:
> 1. fc5/fc6/rhel5u1 no-acpi up guests can't boot on pae host
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1901208&group_
> id=180599&
Adam Majer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Original bug was submitted at http://bugs.debian.org/467043. The summary
> is that installs of Windows XP from pre-kvm-60 (pre-59?), then upgrading
> to kvm-60 or 61 causes Windows to trigger activation due to "computer
> changed too much". Downgrading to kvm-58 or previ
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:52:41PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 18:21, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:11:32PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > You are missing one point here. The MPI specifications that have
> > > > been out there for decades do not
Hi, all,
This is today's KVM test result against KVM62-RC2.
Two old issues fixed:
1. fc5/fc6/rhel5u1 no-acpi up guests can't boot on pae host
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1901208&group_
id=180599&atid=893831
2. Cannot boot 32bit smp RHEL5.1 guest with nic on 64bit ho
I THINK this is due to the fact that kvm-60+ uses a realtek nic as
default and not the old ne2000.
You could try specifying -nic,model=ne2k_pci
I expected this bug to happen on my virtual windows too but it never
happened.
Adam Majer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Original bug was submitted at http://bugs.d
david ahern wrote:
> Almost 7 hours and the uniprocessor case is still chugging along.
>
>
How long does it usually take to hang?
How do I go about reproducing this? apachebench (host) against httpd
(guest) doesn't seem to trigger it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to fu
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 18:21, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:11:32PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > You are missing one point here. The MPI specifications that have
> > > been out there for decades do not require the process use a library
> > > for allocating the buffer. I
Bugs item #1901980, was opened at 2008-02-26 17:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1901980&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
56 matches
Mail list logo
