On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:24:01PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
config HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
def_bool X86_64
-select HAVE_KVM
+config HAVE_KVM
+ def_bool y
i think it might be better to just move the select to after the config
Hi Dave.
I've verified that arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig was getting run by putting some
comments in it. It seems to me like just putting:
config HAVE_KVM
bool
isn't letting anything come into my .config at all. I'm not sure why we
do that, and then have:
select
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Currently, make headers_check barfs due to asm/kvm.h, which linux/kvm.h
includes, not existing. Rather than add a zillion asm/kvm.hs, export kvm.h
only if the arch actually supports it.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
The second 2.6.25 kvm patch series, for your review. Three more to go.
Hi Avi.
A diffstat in your introduction mail would be nice so one does not
have to check 50+ patches to see if it touches any file I can give
feedback on.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:47:39AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
KVM is due to receive support for multiple architectures (ppc, ia64, and
s390, in addition to the existing x86), hopefully in time for the 2.6.25
merge window. It is awkward to place the new arch support in
drivers/kvm/, so I'd
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:15:40PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:47:39AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
KVM is due to receive support for multiple architectures (ppc, ia64, and
s390, in addition to the existing x86), hopefully in time for the 2.6.25
Hi Rusty.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:06:51PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 11:18 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
The whole drivers/kvm/ thing was just a trick to get merged quickly. I
think the new layout should be something like
virt/kvm/, include/linux/kvm*.h - common
