Hollis Blanchard wrote:
I was very confused until I realized you're only dealing with struct
kvm, not struct kvm_vcpu. I actually started the kvm_vcpu work last
week, and it is a much larger patch. :)
It can be probably done in parts with members moved off to x86-land
incrementally.
--
Hi Avi,
Based on privious discussion, I made this patch to split struct kvm.
In this patch, strcut kvm only holds common fields, and struct kvm_x86
will keep x86-specific fields. In this way, struct kvm will be a
sub-filed in struct kvm_x86, and we can use to_kvm_x86 to get kvm_x86
from struct
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Based on privious discussion, I made this patch to split struct kvm.
In this patch, strcut kvm only holds common fields, and struct kvm_x86
will keep x86-specific fields. In this way, struct kvm will be a
sub-filed in struct kvm_x86, and we can use to_kvm_x86 to get
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Carsten Otte wrote:
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Based on privious discussion, I made this patch to split struct kvm.
In this patch, strcut kvm only holds common fields, and struct
kvm_x86 will keep x86-specific fields. In this way, struct kvm will
be a sub-filed
Avi Kivity wrote:
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Carsten Otte wrote:
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Based on privious discussion, I made this patch to split struct
kvm. In this patch, strcut kvm only holds common fields, and struct
kvm_x86 will keep x86-specific fields. In this way, struct kvm
will be
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 18:05 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi Avi,
Based on privious discussion, I made this patch to split struct kvm.
In this patch, strcut kvm only holds common fields, and struct kvm_x86
will keep x86-specific fields. In this way, struct kvm will be a
sub-filed in struct
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 18:05 +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
Hi Avi,
Based on privious discussion, I made this patch to split struct kvm.
In this patch, strcut kvm only holds common fields, and struct
kvm_x86 will keep x86-specific fields. In this way, struct kvm will
