* On Wednesday 09 Apr 2008 17:41:10 Glauber Costa wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > * On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Thanks, applied.
>
Amit Shah wrote:
> * On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote:
>> Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks, applied.
>
> Going forward, we're going to use the in-kernel approach for inter
* On Tuesday 08 April 2008 22:34:36 Glauber Costa wrote:
> Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks, applied.
Going forward, we're going to use the in-kernel approach for interrupt
injection (which already
Instead of artificially limiting irq numbers, use arch provided NR_IRQS
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
irqhook/irqhook_main.c | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/irqhook/irqhook_main.c b/irqhook/irqhook_main.c
index 5f414d1